Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
from the you-said-it dept
This week, after a Wisconson senator attacked net neutrality by bemoaning the supposed lack of "fast lanes" online, JoeCool won first place for insightful by summing up why that's nonsense:
The internet is ONE BIG "FAST LANE". What the ISPs want is to create a bunch of "slow lanes" to shove people into unless they pay a premium to get what they originally had.
In second place on the insightful side, we've got the first of several winning comments this week that came in response to Theresa May's attempts to kill encryption. An anonymous commenter was struck with a reminiscence:
Panopticon
I remember spending New Years Eve 1999 watching a documentary about the rise of the CCTV surveillance state in London and being disgusted by the trend even then. The dreams of Jeremy Bentham are alive and well in England (and here in the US, as well).
This is not now, nor has it ever been, about catching terrorists. It's about total control of the populace, the dream of every tyrant. They just can't seem to figure out that even if they had the tech to see, hear, and read everything, they don't have the manpower to do so and make sense of the intel, but I have no doubt they'll keep trying.
For editor's choice on the insightful side, we look at Australia's Attorney General's similar campaign against encryption, in which he suggested the public would be fine with it because their use of Facebook shows they don't care about privacy. Roger Strong suggested he put his money where his mouth is:
Lead by example, George. Enact a policy that all government communications and storage encryption - including that by intelligence agencies - have back doors. With only the good guys given the passwords, of course.
Then continue the top-down approach. Mandate back doors for banks and their online banking systems. Then other large corporations.
Once the public sees how that works, they'll respond accordingly.
Hope This Helps!
Next, we've got a response to the latest bogus takedown of a YouTube video by a record label, where PlagueSD suggested a bit of turnabout as fair play:
The Dandy Warhols should apply some "RIAA math" and turn around and give a "Bill" to Universal Music for any views that they would have had if the site was never taken down.
Over on the funny side, both our top comments come in response to Theresa May's anti-encryption efforts. The first place winner is That Anonymous Coward, responding to a commenter who (for some insane reason) sees no problem with destroying encryption, but feared a conspiracy to silence their opinion on the matter:
Oh honey, get down off the cross... someone needs the wood.
In second place, we've got Gorshkov focusing on the other key part of the story — the fact that May's own party is actively using WhatsApp:
Hmmmmm ........
does this mean that the Tories are terrorists, and should be locked up?
For editor's choice on the funny side, we start out looking at yet another anti-encryption crusader — James Clapper, whose latest "nerd harder" demands gave TechDescartes a marketing idea:
The Clapper
Just invent a device that allows you to turn encryption on by clapping your hands. Turning it off would be as easy as clapping again. Clap on! Clap off!
Finally, we've got a response from Rapnel to the idea of using geofencing to prevent ISIS from using small drones:
We should regulate the air and apply penalties to any producers of air when air is found to be responsible for materially supporting or providing a platform for anything using air in a way we don't like. And we should geofence it too. And monitor it. And suck it up with a big air-vume. And we could distribute that air fairly to airtists so that they can produce more, air. .. but that's too leftist, isn't it? Or is it.. I'm torn.
That's all for this week, folks!
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Why do you think are they turning the UK into a high security prison?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Prison labor.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
http://on-t-internet.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/grenfell-tower-is-neoliberalism-form-of.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
If a Dem says it... then dem voters love it.
If a Rep says it... then rep voters love it.
that is just about all that is necessary.
Sure there is a large group of people that know better than this, but not large enough to overcome the votes of the blind!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
In any case neoliberalism is just mercantilism/laissez-faire dressed up to sound all modern and stuff.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ask Netflix. They will tell you that the last few miles are not a fast lane. Peering and purchased connections for the ISPs to the outside world are always outstripped by the latest and greatest bandwidth hog app.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Unless they are a dial up or DSL ISP and don't own the lines. Those technologies are inherently limited anyway, but their continued existence is enlightening with respect to the continued existence of No Last Mile problems in broadband. (Which ISPs have been subsidized for, collect "taxers" on, have included in regional contracts, but never deliver, like the telcos before them. Many US dollars worth. To quote Carl Sagan, "Billions and billions".)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Interconnection was the same. Bandwidth hog apps have changed the ISP math completely.
But back to the point. Yge ISPs are not going to slow everyone down from the current speeds. That would be the way to create more competition.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
You can still offer higher speed service for a higher price, which most ISPs do.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Maybe try gunning for "funniest" next time, you know you've got it in you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Clapper
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-nsYQphWo0
[ link to this | view in chronology ]