Australian Government Claims That Facial Recognition Systems Increase Privacy...
from the even-orwell-would-have-said-this-goes-too-far dept
Via Josh Taylor, we learn of the recently released "Intergovernmental Agreement on Identity Matching Services", which is a fancy way of saying that the federal government and Australian state and territory governments had agreed to work together on a big face recognition surveillance system. But the truly incredible thing is that these Australian governments have decided to try to out-Orwell Orwell, by arguing that pervasive facial recognition is actually... good for privacy.
The Identity Matching Services will help promote privacy by strengthening the integrity and security of Australia’s identity infrastructure—the identity management systems of government Agencies that issue Australia’s core identity documents such as driver licences and passports. These systems play an important role in preventing identity crime. Identity crime is one of the most common and costly crimes in Australia and is a key enabler of serious and organised crime. Identity crime is also a threat to privacy when it involves the theft or assumption of the identity of an individual. The misuse of personal information for criminal purposes causes substantial harm to the economy and individuals each year.
That's... an impressive level of bullshit. As Steven Clark points out... that's not privacy.
Wait ... what? ... that's not privacy, though ... *headdesk* https://t.co/yIedIHigOF
— Steven R Clark (@maelorin) October 5, 2017
We often see people make the silly claim that security and privacy are at odds with one another, which we believe is generally not true. In fact, there are strong arguments that greater privacy increases security by better protecting everyone (go encryption!). But here, Australia appears to be trying to flip that rationale totally on its head by arguing that the more security you have, the better it is for privacy, because they'll catch those nasty criminals who aim to do harm to your privacy. But... that's not privacy. Indeed, it says nothing of how governments, for example, might violate everyone's privacy with such a system (which is a larger concern than your everyday criminal).
It's difficult to take such a system seriously, when this is how they approach the privacy question.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: australia, facial recognition, privacy, security
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Whose privacy?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not that ther's a rash of people forging passports to obtain medical records...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
2
3
4
Let freedom reign
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Oct 12th, 2017 @ 11:06am
Governments are putting everything about us online and linking it together.
It is a hacker's wet dream.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Convolution of Logic
I feel *so* much safer...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Orwell Chuckles from the Great Beyond
Australian Government Claims That Facial Recognition Systems Increase Privacy...
And as a side note:
"War is Peace; Freedom is Slavery; Ignorance is Strength"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: orbitalinsertion on Oct 12th, 2017 @ 12:28pm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Let me translate the Aussie slang
English: "Recording your face in public"
Aussie: "play an important role in"
English "kind of sort of (and do not)"
Aussie: "preventing identity crime."
English: "stop criminals impersonating you."
Aussie: "Identity crime"
English: "Impersonations that happen"
Aussie: "is also a threat to privacy"
English: "are illegal and feel bad"
Aussie: "when it involves the theft or assumption of the identity of an individual."
English: "Period."
(Here in Australia we say "Full stop.")
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Oh crap, his thought routines are starting to go on the fritz."
CLANG! WALLOP!
My. government. cares. for. us. and. we. are. privileged...zzt...crackle...that. they. care...does not compute...does not compute...whir...crackle...grind...destroy, destroy...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]