This Week In Techdirt History: October 22nd - 28th

from the back-to-the-future dept

Five Years Ago

This week in 2012, we noted that the US was remaining steadfast in its opposition to a treaty promoting access to creative works for the disabled, and it was beginning to become clear that negotiators were holding it hostage in order to demand a new ACTA or SOPA-like regime. Meanwhile, the Librarian of Copyright announced the new anti-circumvention exceptions... and denied DVD ripping rights, and knocked phone unlocking off the list. Aereo was pointing out that it was being accused of infringement specifically because it closely followed the law, while the infamous John Steele was giving extremely stupid justifications for his copyright trolling activities. Also, this was the week that some Italian scientists were (shockingly and unbelievably) convicted of manslaughter for failing to predict an earthquake.

Ten Years Ago

This week in 2007, the UK made the highly questionable move of arresting the operator of TVLinks for "facilitating infringement", right as the IFPI was celebrating its whac-a-mole success of shutting down the OiNK torrent tracker — and, seemingly high off these "victories", the UK parliament started mulling over the idea of forcing ISPs to block file sharing. (Sadly all this anti-filesharing sentiment seemed to be succeeding in making everyone forget that P2P is a powerful concept with all sorts of applications).

Fifteen Years Ago

Speaking of P2P, this week in 2002 it appeared that the pushback against the horrible "Hollywood Hacking" bill was having at least some impact, even as movie studios and the RIAA were going around trying to warn everyone they could about the dangers of file sharing — though they apparently were successfully confusing everyone, what with some writers thinking that any act of burning a CD must be music piracy and eBay blocking a musician from selling his own music under the assumption it was infringing. The copyright fight was so annoying it was even slowing down broadband growth, so amidst all this it was nice to see at least one person fighting the good fight, with Lawrence Lessig doing everything possible to spread a better understanding of intellectual property.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: history, look back


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Lawrence D’Oliveiro, 29 Oct 2017 @ 2:48am

    So How Many Successful Prosecutions Came Out Of The OiNK Bust?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    drew (profile), 29 Oct 2017 @ 3:50am

    CD burning

    Probably worth reminding people that copying a CD you own is illegal in the UK again...

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      That One Guy (profile), 29 Oct 2017 @ 4:52am

      Re: CD burning

      So copying a CD(for backup purposes I'm guessing) is illegal.

      Downloading a CD's worth of songs is also illegal but free...

      Always funny/facepalm worthy watching lawmakers passing laws penalizing people for trying to take the legal route, driving them right into doing the very thing they are trying to prevent.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    David, 29 Oct 2017 @ 6:19am

    Feature, not a bug

    (Sadly all this anti-filesharing sentiment seemed to be succeeding in making everyone forget that P2P is a powerful concept with all sorts of applications)

    Peer-to-peer by its nature gets around the necessity for a central controlling arbiter and thus is hard to control by a central agency like the government.

    For the same reason, several governments have decided to stop issuing large currency bills: their principal use are business transactions that happen to occur without a government-accessible record.

    Skype has stopped its original reliance on a server-less end-to-end protocol for the actual connection in order to route every communication through its servers.

    That makes law enforcement happy and offers opening additional venues for interspersing advertising material.

    And so on. Decentralization is often more efficient but offers less control.

    As a technical example, Firewire recording devices (cameras, expensive soundcards) at one time were able to access a disk on the same Firewire network without even passing the data through the central computer initiating the transactions.

    Securitywise, a nightmare. But as long as you had not to worry about bad players, very efficient and reliable.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.