Professor Says Threats Of Retaliation By China Stopped Publication Of His Book Revealing Chinese Influence In Australia

from the expect-much-more-of-this dept

We've just written about how the Chinese government wanted to censor articles published by two academic publishers, Cambridge University Press (CUP) and Springer. After an initial wobble, CUP ultimately refused, while Springer by contrast decided to kowtow to the authorities. Those incidents concerned the publication in China of articles the Chinese didn't like. Now it seems the latter are extending their campaign against inconvenient facts to other countries, in this case Australia:

Prominent Charles Sturt University academic Clive Hamilton said Allen & Unwin was ready to publish his manuscript Silent Invasion, but last week informed him it could no longer proceed because it was worried about defamation action.

"Allen & Unwin said that they were worried about retaliation from Beijing through a number of possible avenues including legal threats, orchestrated by Beijing, and they decided it was too big a risk and so therefore pulled the plug and returned the rights to me," Professor Hamilton said.

As the article on ABC News explains, "Silent Invasion" is about the Chinese Communist Party's activities and growing influence in Australia -- obviously a highly sensitive topic for China. In an email to the company, obtained by ABC News, Professor Hamilton's former publishers, Allen & Unwin, wrote about what it saw as "potential threats" if it published his book:

The most serious of these threats was the very high chance of a vexatious defamation action against Allen & Unwin, and possibly against you personally as well.

It's a little hard to see how an entire nation might sue successfully for defamation, but that's not the point. Once again, the mere threat of litigation was enough to cause someone -- in this case a publisher -- to self-censor. Interestingly, the ABC News article notes that the Australian government is expected to unveil soon new legislation to counter foreign interference in the country, which suggests that it is becoming a serious problem. We can expect more such attempts to censor overseas sources of information it doesn't like from the increasingly self-confident and intransigent China.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: australia, censorship, china, clive hamilton, silent invasion, threats
Companies: allen & unwin


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 15 Nov 2017 @ 3:55pm

    Strange - if they had a valid counter argument or something valid to say in opposition, why not just publish that?

    This implies the target article is correct.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 15 Nov 2017 @ 5:10pm

    Gone are the days when if the USA sneezed Australia caught a cold, now if China sneezes Australia gets the flu.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 15 Nov 2017 @ 5:11pm

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 15 Nov 2017 @ 6:37pm

    Springer prints many of their physical books in China. If the Chinese government doesn't want something printed or published, they have many ways of applying that leverage...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 15 Nov 2017 @ 7:27pm

    Vexatious Litigant

    China has plenty of money to financially ruin just about anyone they want to in court with vexatious litigation. Whats more, I doubt if any court would have the balls to declare them a vexatious litigant for doing it.

    Say hello to your new overlord.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Châu, 15 Nov 2017 @ 7:45pm

    Internet

    Put epub format book on internet, every person can read that book, far more than book publisher.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Daydream, 15 Nov 2017 @ 9:39pm

    You know, once upon a time, if you couldn't find evidence to substantiate an allegation, it was generally because the allegation was untrue and thus there was no evidence to be found.

    But with stories like this and that one about the UK government destroying emails, it seems to me that nowadays if you can't find evidence to substantiate an allegation, it's generally because it was 'vanished' or the evidence-finder threatened into silence.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.