Italian Government Criminalizes 'Fake News,' Provides Direct Reporting Line To State Police Force
from the let-a-bold-new-era-of-SWATing-begin! dept
No one knows how to handle "fake news." Rather than step back and see what light-touch approaches might work, governments all over the world are rushing forward with bad ideas that harm speech and threaten journalism. No one seems to be immune to the "do something" infection and everything proposed is just another way to give governments more direct control of social media platforms and news outlets.
In Italy, the government control of speech under the guide of "fake news" deterrence is being done in the worst way possible. It's not being handed to a regulatory body with instructions to sort of keep an eye on things. Instead, as Poynter reports, it's rolling out as a heckler's veto backed by armed officers.
In an effort to address fake news ahead of this year's elections, the Italian government has created an online portal where people can report hoaxes.
The portal, which Interior Minister Marco Minniti announced Thursday, prompts users to supply their email address, a link to the misinformation they're reporting and any social networks they found it on.
Then the requests are ferried to authorities at the Polizia Postale, a unit of the state police that investigates cyber crime, who will fact-check them and — if laws were broken — pursue legal action. In cases where no laws were broken, the service will still draw upon official sources to deny false or misleading information.
It seems as though this could be handled without government interference -- especially not the sort that might result in armed officers showing up at a press agency's HQ, demanding rebuttals, deletions, or arrests of fake news offenders. The government's anti-fake news effort even gives the government a platform for "more speech," which is all speech like this really needs to be greeted with.
Getting facts wrong should be a black eye (not literally!) for journalists, rather than a criminal offense. Fake news spread maliciously should be greeted with little more than fact checking and debunking. This can -- and should -- be handled by journalists and citizens. Giving the government a platform for debunking caters to its innate desire to control the narrative in questionable situations. The government is certainly welcome to present its own side and deliver facts that rebut claims made by others. But it doesn't need legislation to do this and it certainly does not need to bring law enforcement into the mix.
Adding to the host of problems is the fact that "fake news" hasn't been clearly defined by the government. True, the term resists strict definition, but the lack of discernible contours means the government can simply target any speech it doesn't like and force the issue by handing it over to the police force. The opening of an online portal invites further abuse by citizens who prefer shouting down people with opposing views, rather than engaging in constructive discussions.
Whenever the police is given the task of dealing with the truth and falsehood of news and political content, yes, those who care about democracy should be worried — not feel protected,” [journalist Fabio] Chiusi said. “Citizens in healthy democracies don’t need to be protected from falsehood of this sort: they should be able to freely exercise their judgment, with no interference from state authorities — especially the police.”
Arianna Ciccone, founder of the International Journalism Festival, agreed. She told Poynter in an email that the initiative — which Chiusi said doesn’t offer a counter-measure for those who might be falsely accused — opens up the possibility of future infringements of free speech by the government, as well as a potential cooling effect on the press.
In short: If journalists are too afraid that making a mistake will result in legal intervention, what will go uncovered?
Reporters will not only shy away from publishing articles while details are still emerging, but will also be deterred from publishing anything the government might disagree with. The term "fake news" has become shorthand for news anyone disagrees with, whether or not the contents are untrue. This gives the Italian government free rein to harass news outlets it doesn't like. Even if journalists are ultimately cleared of criminal charges, they'll be forced to spend time and money defending themselves and the outlets they work for will likely face future harassment from authorities. Once you're on law enforcement's radar, you're there forever. It's the newsroom equivalent of inner city life, where merely existing in a "high crime" area exposes you to constant, unprovoked "interactions" with law enforcement.
Normally, I'd say something like "the legislation's aim is noble," but in the case of governments v. fake news, that can't even be said. The term eludes strict definition which is the sort of thing you definitely need if you're going to regulate speech. Providing a direct pipeline to police mobilization is perhaps the worst "solution" presented so far. And as the anti-fake news effort picks up steam, the ripple effect will move beyond harassed journalists to every Italian citizen who's "liked" or retweeted social media posts deemed "fake news" by a law enforcement entity.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: elections, fake news, free speech, italy, law enforcement
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Unsurprising
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Unsurprising
> Unsurprising -- That's typical Techirt.
> When the initial step in your thought process is: "There oughtta be a law," is it really surprising for the police to be the first called? -- There ARE ALREADY laws which cover this, but part of purpose of laws is to make known the SPECIFIC behavior which will be punished. It's a statement by society. And usually, as here, after long and growing abuse by malicious little fiends.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Unsurprising
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Unsurprising
Nope. Fake news. The police should be there shortly...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Unsurprising
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Unsurprising
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/03/10/video-shows-police-telling-an-u ber-driver-its-against-the-law-to-record-police-its-not/
The police can murder you, destroy your property, seize you or your possessions, tell you what to do when they want to do it and you can be arrested for anything a cop decides to arrest you for, real or imagined.
And don't even bother with CPS and how much power they have to wreck your fucking day when they decide your child is now theirs for any reason they deem necessary as well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You can't shout "Fire!" in a crowded theater if that's A FALSE REPORT.
Same principle here: FALSE IS ILLEGAL. (That's why Hillary and some FBI agents including Comey will be jailed.)
Fake news has been illegal in EVERY civilization, even before "thou shalt not bear false witness."
And WHY do you little fiends even WANT to allow "fake news"? ... Because you hate reality and want to destroy the little that's good.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You can't shout "Fire!" in a crowded theater if that's A FALSE REPORT.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You can't shout "Fire!" in a crowded theater if that's A FALSE REPORT.
How confident are you about that? If in even one civilization didn't make fake news illegal, then what you said is false, and therefor fake news, and so if we made fake news illegal (which we haven't disproving what you've stated) then you're fine with being hauled off to jail for that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You can't shout "Fire!" in a crowded theater if that's A FALSE REPORT.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You can't shout "Fire!" in a crowded theater if that's A FALSE REPORT.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You can't shout "Fire!" in a crowded theater if that's A FALSE REPORT.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: You can't shout "Fire!" in a crowded theater if that's A FALSE REPORT.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You can't shout "Fire!" in a crowded theater if that's A FALSE REPORT.
I challenge you to show us your law license.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fire
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Fire
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
To protect you, we must take your liberty.
~All Governments
Remember that the next time you go running to the nanny state to save you from something. It's a lesson many never learn.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Could be worrisome, but these are Italian police
The first one says, "Look, two colleagues. Let's go say hello."
The other says, "No, let's just wait. It looks like they're coming this way."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm pretty sure that's because giving government more direct control over social media and news outlets is the point of most of this. "Fake News" has been around a long time. It simply used to be called things like yellow journalism, propaganda, or gossip. Governments are only leaping to "do something" about it because now that it's called "fake news" a bunch of people are panicking and politicians see the chance to give themselves a mandate to censor media outlets old, new, or 'social'. They're hoping to publish enough people for gossiping on the internet, that when the next election roles around, everyone will fear to say anything bad about them, even if it's true.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fake News
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Fake News
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Fake News
The real answer of course, is that we shouldn't allow this kind of power to the government at all. It's a tool for totalitarianism, and preventing people from speaking is not a path towards truth.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Fake News
In a world where everyone thinks that regulations are going to save them? Good luck with that, the Government will have that power when it decides to take it. We have already given away more than enough liberty to where we only have liberty they decide we can have.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sounds kinda familiar...
The state deciding what is and isn't true in news and political reporting... What could possibly go wrong?
The UK government seems to be doing something similar - an [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-42791218] "anti-fake news unit"... Guess "Ministry of Truth" was too copyright...?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]