This Week In Techdirt History: February 4th - 10th

from the and-so-it-was dept

Five Years Ago

This week in 2013, the EU was taking a worryingly restrictive approach to trying to fix copyright licensing, France's Hadopi was trying to get the national library to use more DRM, and Japan was planning to seed P2P networks with fake files containing copyright warnings. The UK, on the other hand, rejected plans to create a new IP Czar, though a new copyright research center seeking to restore some balance to the overall debate was facing heavy opposition right out the gate. This was also the week that we wrote about the curious privacy claims about tweets from an investigative journalist named Teri Buhl, which quickly prompted a largely confused response and, soon afterwards, threats of a lawsuit.

Ten Years Ago

This week in 2008, the recording industry was continuing its attempts to sue Baidu and floating fun ideas like building copyright filters into antivirus software, while we were taking a look at the morass of legacy royalty agreements holding back the industry's attempts at innovation. A Danish court told an ISP it had to block the Pirate Bay, leading the ISP to ask for clarification while it considered fighting back. And Microsoft was doing some scaremongering in Canada in pursuit of stronger copyright laws.

Fifteen Years Ago

This week in 2003, Germany's patent office was seeking a copyright levy on all PCs, while the EU was mercifully pushing back on attempts to treat more infringement as criminal. One record label executive was telling the industry it had to embrace file sharing or die, but the company line was still the language of moral panic. Speaking of which, in an interview in the Harvard Political Review, Jack Valenti was asked about his infamous "Boston strangler" warning about VCRs — and proceeded to tell a bunch of lies to claim his warning was in fact apt.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: history, look back


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Lawrence D’Oliveiro, 10 Feb 2018 @ 12:42pm

    JV Quote

    What is fair use? Fair use is not a law. There's nothing in law.

    Right now, any professor can show a complete movie in his classroom without paying a dime--that's fair use.

    In one breath he denies its existence, and in the next he denies his denial.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Lawrence D’Oliveiro, 10 Feb 2018 @ 12:44pm

    CREATe Still At It

    They’ve put out a bunch of publications which can be downloaded from here, and some policy responses available from here.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. icon
    LanceJZ (profile), 10 Feb 2018 @ 7:05pm

    Fifteen years ago.

    2013 was five years ago. Maybe you mean 2003?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 11 Feb 2018 @ 4:33am

    Re: Fifteen years ago.

    There's no scientific proof that supports math.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. icon
    Leigh Beadon (profile), 11 Feb 2018 @ 11:26am

    Re: Fifteen years ago.

    Damnit! Fixed, thanks!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Lawrence D’Oliveiro, 11 Feb 2018 @ 12:48pm

    Re: There's no scientific proof that supports math.

    By “no” do you mean “zero”? But that’s maths!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. icon
    Toom1275 (profile), 11 Feb 2018 @ 2:51pm

    Re: Re: Fifteen years ago.

    That's what mathematical proofs are for.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.