China Censors John Oliver Because President Xi Looks A Bit Like Winnie The Pooh
from the thin-skinned dept
Whatever you do, don't point out that some people think China's President Xi Jinping vaguely resembles Winnie the Pooh.
HBO Comedian John Oliver recently learned this the hard way when Chinese users of popular social networking website Weibo found they weren't able to mention Oliver by name without receiving an error message stating such comments violated "rules and regulations." After that, censorship monitor GreatFire.org indicated that HBO’s website was blocked entirely for the lion's share of the country since last weekend.
The cause of China's efforts to remove Oliver from the internet? This recent twenty minute segment took a semi-deep dive into China's political leadership, noting their abolition of term limits, ongoing censorship, the routine murder and/or imprisonment of political dissidents, the country's rather terrifying implementation of "citizen scores," and oh -- the fact that some people think that Chinese President Xi has a semi-decent resemblance to a rotund, honey-adoring cartoon:
"Apparently, Xi Jinping is very sensitive about his perceived resemblance to Winnie the Pooh,” Mr. Oliver said on the show. “And I’m not even sure it’s that strong a resemblance, to be honest. But the fact he’s annoyed about it means people will never stop bringing it up."
Like most Chinese internet censorship, more technical users can get around the attempt to remove Oliver from the Chinese internet by using a VPN. That said, like Russia and other countries, China has been busy saddling VPN vendors with all manner of cumbersome restrictions as part of an effort to effectively ban the technology from widespread use. Last year, China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology declared that all VPN providers now needed prior government approval to operate, imposing fines up to $2000 on companies offering "unsanctioned" VPNs (read: nearly all of them).
Of course the censorship only proves Oliver's point: that the country remains entirely intolerant to free speech, Xi has arguably thin skin, and the Chinese leader does, in fact, strike a fleeting resemblance to a certain pantless bear with self-esteem issues and an eating disorder:
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: censorship, china, free speech, john oliver, satire, winnie the pooh, xi jinping, xi jinping looks like winnie the pooh
Reader Comments
The First Word
“Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
You learn something new every day
Table for Ms Streisand.... There you go, can I get you some drinks? Perhaps an aperitif? The sea bass is excellent tonight.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
China censors...
Because, of course they do?
Having a long standing sensitivity of criticism of the state and of officials, this is right in character of the Chinese Administration.
It's one of the reasons the people of China strive to work around state censorship.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The world needs more narcissists
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I'm sure Mr. Oliver is feeling butthurt by this action. Doubtless from falling on his ass laughing so hard.
Remember, the Streisand Effect treats censorship as damage and routes around it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The hard way?
If you think that, then you don't know John Oliver. I have no doubt he knew exactly what would happen.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The hard way?
Indeed, just a couple of articles down a commenter noted Oliver's recent bit about his show being censored in the UK due to laws against mocking parliament. He recorded an entirely separate segment for the UK airing of his show.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
And thus Techdirt landed itself on the Chinese censored list. And I'm laughing.
Mike reportedly commented on the issue: "Oh bother." (credits to our commenter discordian_eris!)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
A Pooh bear?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Down with Xi the Pooh!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: The hard way?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Gotta love those own-goals
So a simple comparison to a character from a children's book/show is enough to bring down the hammer, showing a thickness of skin that would make Turkey's tin-pot dictator proud.
If something as simple and harmless as that is enough to bring out the censors I'd say it's fairly safe to assume that much, much worse and damning things are being regularly hidden from the public, both in china and out.
On the plus side, if they are this desperate to clamp down on any dissent and/or criticism then it might be an indicator that they know they're on increasingly shaky footing, and the public they rule over is gradually waking up to just how benevolent the chinese government is not.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Gollum, Gollum
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Poor Pooh
He also looks a bit like a Guinea pig I once had. We could name him JinniePig.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"I feel sorry for Winnie the Pooh."
I think Pooh would be a better ruler than any of them. But that was the point of the movie Being There (1979, Peter Sellers)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
But only after putting up big flashing neon arrows at it screaming, look at this.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
John Oliver
I just tried to watch the segment from a UK IP address and Youtube refuses to oblige.
What's the problem Youtube, are we not worthy?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
This isn't the first article critical of the country, so I'd be rather surprised if TD wasn't already blocked.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
A lot of news about UK censorship
This may not correlate at all, but we have been getting news about a) you having to go to the local chemists to get your secret porn code, and b) the porn-blocking algorithms censoring all sorts of other stuff like Disney.
So it might be that YouTube has been advised by your state that no, the British laity are not worthy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: A lot of news about UK censorship
Seriously, make it affordable AND accessible and I'll change my attitude. Until then, copyright can go stuff itself.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: A lot of news about UK censorship
It's not even just "affordable and accessible".
The watchword on all of that is, or should be, "convenience".
As long as the sum of convenience minus inconvenience on the legal side of the divide is outweighed by the equivalent sum on the illegal side of the divide, people will continue to choose the illegal side. (And, of course, different people weigh individual convenient vs. inconvenient component factors differently.)
Having to pay is an inconvenience; so is risking penalties under the law. Being able to find what you want easily is a convenience; so is being able to access it from any device. There are many others, some on one side and some on the other, and some which apply in different ways to both.
If you want to change the balance of the equation so that people choose the legal side more often, you need to either increase convenience on the legal side, or decrease it on the illegal one.
What the industry companies have seemed to tend to do, however, is to pair each increase in convenience on the legal side with something that also decreases convenience on the same side; for example, pairing legal streaming with mandatory ad breaks, and/or with "you can't get it all in one central place, you have to get our stuff directly from us", and/or with geoblocking.
Adding both a positive and a negative to the legal side of the equation isn't a good way to tip the balance of the equation in that direction.
If any prospective change in what they offer on these matters were assessed in terms of the convenience equation, with price being only one element of convenience, I think that might significantly change the resulting picture.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Lol Its Awesome
It's Realty
[ link to this | view in thread ]