DHS Tells Records Requester It Can't Find Documents It Posted To Its Own Website
from the weaponizing-your-tax-dollars dept
Government agencies large and small, federal and non-federal, are aggressive non-participants in the free flow of information. Laws enacted to force the government to be responsive to records requests have made it possible to obtain documents from agencies, but this can often take the form of long, expensive legal battles.
When not deterring public records requesters with insane fee demands or years of stonewalling, the government plays keepaway with documents by playing the role of insane, cackling villains, casting aside logic and goodwill in equal parts to assure the public remains ill-informed and well-screwed.
Here are just a few highlights from the government's non-goodwill tours:
- The CIA pretends information it handed on the sly to selected journalists has not been "made public"
- The FBI redacts a document that had already been made public by Senator Rand Paul
- A state agency pretends it doesn't know who requested documents in an attempt to deny standing in a records lawsuit
- The DOJ tells Techdirt it can't find a gag order it had already released to another requester
- The FBI tells Jason Leopold it can't release documents it had already released to Techdirt
- The FBI tells a records requester it can't find a document it had already released to another requester six months earlier
- The IRS turns over fully-redacted documents to a requester in the form of password-protected encrypted files... with no password included
It is in this spirit of non-cooperation that we bring you the following, via FOIA warrior Emma Best and MuckRock: if something is always in the last place you look, why not check your own website first?
In late February 2017, the Trump Administration took some of its earliest steps towards implementing a new border wall policy with an executive order and several memos issued by the Department of Homeland Security’s leadership. In response to the policy, MuckRock filed a FOIA request for “memos relating to executive orders signed by Donald Trump,” including but not limited to memos described in a specific article.
Just under 17 months later, DHS responded with a letter saying that they were unable to find any such memos. Despite these claims, two of the memos which DHS said they were unable to find had already been posted to their website.
As Best points out, this isn't just an embarrassing failure by the DHS's FOIA response team. A couple of easily-avoidable errors is one thing. Ongoing antipathy that results in this sort of under-service is a symptom of a bigger problem.
While DHS’ failure to provide copies of already publicly available memos may appear to be an amusing annoyance, their response to the FOIA request highlights the agency’s general failing with FOIA. There’s no reason to believe that these were the only two DHS memos relating to Trump’s executive orders, since no policy can be fully implemented by just two memos. The DHS’ failure to find copies of already public documents brings their search process into question for both this particular FOIA request as well as FOIA requests in general.
This is being appealed, with Best making the understated suggestion the DHS's search attempt wasn't very thorough by pointing it to the two memos posted at its own website. But even if the DHS had found the memos under its nose, it's still stiffing requesters by pretending there's nothing else guiding its monumental shift in immigration enforcement priorities. This is bad faith by bad actors who apparently feel it's their duty to keep the public in the dark.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: dhs, foia, transparency
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Hanlon's Razor
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hanlon's Razor
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Down onthe dairy
Send out the Diving suit..its getting Mighty deep out here..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"How'd that get in there...?"
Same result, just a lot more honest.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not surprised
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bad Record Responding to FOIA
What is the Government afraid of??
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nazi Labels?
The USSA has become a strange amalgam of Third Reich & Stalinist terms with such things as forced psychiatric confinement/examinations for alluding to the truth, and legal prosecution of anyone who dares to be critical of the naked emporer, and pursuit of foreign interference in elections even though its own systems have been suspect since Day One.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In a short interview of an health insurance agent, the description of the insurance company's response to claims was "always say no at first, don't even look at the content of the claim; only read the claim if the customer threatens litigation; even then, try to fight back against paying anything".
Here, FOIA-subject agencies seen to work in the exact same way. "Wait until the legal deadline; reply that nothing was found, no need to even check what was requested; if the requested threatens litigation, reply with the bare minimum possible, or even less; if actually sued, fight back with any excuse on the book."
It doesn't matter that the documents are Ajay public, if you start giving the public even this, they will feel entitled to much more.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]