Cord Cutting Accelerates Faster Than Expected, As Cable Still Refuses To Compete On Price
from the inevitability dept
As we just got done noting, roughly 5.4 million Americans are expected to cut the TV cord this year, thanks largely to the rise in cheaper, more flexible streaming TV alternatives. And while some traditional cable TV providers have responded to this challenge by competing on price and offering their own cheaper streaming alternatives (AT&T's DirecTV Now, Dish's Sling TV), most of the cable and broadcast sector continues to double down on the very things causing this shift in the first place. Like a refusal to invest in customer service, an obsession with mindless merger mania, and seemingly endless price hikes.
Companies like Comcast have tried to stall this natural evolution by striking marketing partnerships with Netflix and including Netflix in their set top boxes, in the apparent hopes that users won't get rid of traditional cable if they're already getting Netflix as part of their monthly cable, broadband, and phone bundle. But data released this week indicates that this effort to stop cord cutting by cozying up to Netflix isn't really working, and cord cutting is accelerating at a rate notably faster than many analysts predicted:
"Even as traditional pay TV providers form partnerships with former over-the-top (OTT) rivals to retain customers, cord-cutting continues to outpace projections. According to eMarketer’s latest figures, the number of cord-cutters—adults who have ever cancelled pay TV service and continue without it—will climb 32.8% this year to 33.0 million. That’s higher than the 22.0% growth rate (27.1 million) projected in July 2017."
Comcast cozying up to Netflix isn't working because the industry continues to misread the situation. Customers are cutting the cord primarily due to the high cost of mandatory, bloated cable bundles filled with channels nobody actually watches. Comcast's solution was to include a Netflix subscription -- but only if you subscriber to Comcast's higher end TV bundles, something that certainly doesn't address the actual problem.
The report proceeds to note that users are drawn to streaming alternatives for a number of reasons, not least of which being the rise in quality original content at Netflix, Hulu and Amazon, but the lack of obnoxious, hidden surcharges and fees:
"The main factor fueling growth of on-demand streaming platforms is their original content,” eMarketer principal analyst Paul Verna said. “Consumers increasingly choose services on the strength of the programming they offer, and the platforms are stepping up with billions in spending on premium shows. Another factor driving the acceleration of cord-cutting is the availability of compelling and affordable live TV packages that are delivered via the internet without the need for installation fees or hardware."
So why aren't more cable companies competing on price? While cable companies that charge an arm and a leg for DVRs and cable boxes aren't blameless, broadcasters largely dictate programming pricing. And while that's not as big of a deal for companies like AT&T and Comcast that are broadcasters, it's an untenable situation for smaller cable ops, who already have pretty tight profit margins on pay TV due to high broadcaster rates. The same broadcasters who will, of course, be partially responsible for the steady price hikes we're also starting to see in streaming services.
But companies like Comcast refuse to compete on TV pricing for another reason: they know that a lack of competition in broadband (which is actually getting worse in many areas) means they can relentlessly jack up prices for broadband to recoup any lost revenue on the TV side of the equation. That means not only higher overall prices for broadband, but the implementation of usage caps and overage fees, unnecessary surcharges that not only make broadband more expensive, but make cutting the cord more difficult and costly as well.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cable tv, competition, cord cutting, tv
Companies: at&t, comcast, netflix
Reader Comments
The First Word
“Don't forget they cant
A long time ago one of the cable companies tried to fix this problem, they got sued by the sports networks for contract violations since their contract was stupidly broad in terms of what packages were required to carry.I suspect lots of other networks have just as bad contracts in place as well that will run till bankruptcy.
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
And another thing
So, let's recap; less expensive, choose what to watch when I want it and no advertising. Cable is hosed unless they begin to understand why we're leaving.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Could be a good thing
90% of TV ISNT CREATION,,,its only distribution, showing you the SAME crap you watched, last week, last month and the month before..
Consolidation?? WHY in hell does HBO/CBS/..(there are 7 major corps) need so many channels to show the SAME THING?? We could break it all down to LESS THEN 100, very easily..
Who here knows that there are over 400 Movie releases per year...MOST are direct to DVD, and hardly see a TV/CABLE/SAT..
To those that dont know..
LOCAL channels are all around you.. Im in RURAL IDAHO and get over 20.. 1/2 are abit religion with movies, Others are independent AND FIGHTING to keep broadcasting CHEAP(yes they pay to give you a GOOD channel) and most are only LOCAL news and abit national..CBS, FOX, PBS, and most of the Main channels and a few INTERESTING GRIT TV??
This is all going to PUSH the Big corps to raise price in Local broadcast..the idea of LOOSING MONEY, is not a thing they like. It would be interesting if you DROPPED all the wages to ABOUT the same nation wide..WATCH those in larger cities have LOTS of fun.. Just Cause you live in an expensive city DONT mean things should COST ALLOT MORE..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Don't forget they cant
I suspect lots of other networks have just as bad contracts in place as well that will run till bankruptcy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Don't forget they cant
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Someone needs to ensure that the ISPs don't keep pulling stupid shiat like caps, overages, throttling etc.
If ISPs want to include any content they own as an option to their service, fine. But no penalizing consumers who have no choice in providers by ramming shiat sandwiches down their throats.
Just recently got a 2nd broadband provider in my area. I had been stuck for 20+ years with just one provider.
When I called and told them XXX was now offering service in my area and asked what kind of deal they could do to keep me they said they had nothing to offer other than what I already had which was NOT a promotional price. ( internet only ) So yeah I switched.
Get rid of the monopoly/duopoly markets and then maybe the major players will actually start paying attention.
Most schools in this area have everything on line. They do their homework in the cloud, get their assignments and grades through the cloud. Have to read/listen to things in the cloud, communicate with their teacher in the cloud.
Think about how many things people do everyday that require internet. It's not just a "neat" thing to have anymore.
Before the telephone you either mailed a letter or went and saw someone. Just as the telephone ( POTS ) became a utility the internet should become one now. For the same reasons.
As long as we the sheeple keep putting people in office who turn a blind eye to the shenanigans ISPs keep pulling we will continue to get those shiat sandwiches. Even if they change to honey wheat bread it's still a shiat sandwich
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Could be a good thing
Wouldn't straight o YouTube get more income than DVD sales?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Someone needs to ensure that the ISPs don't keep pulling stupid shiat like caps, overages, throttling etc.
If ISPs want to include any content they own as an option to their service, fine. But no penalizing consumers who have no choice in providers by ramming shiat sandwiches down their throats.
Just recently got a 2nd broadband provider in my area. I had been stuck for 20+ years with just one provider.
When I called and told them XXX was now offering service in my area and asked what kind of deal they could do to keep me they said they had nothing to offer other than what I already had which was NOT a promotional price. ( internet only ) So yeah I switched.
Get rid of the monopoly/duopoly markets and then maybe the major players will actually start paying attention.
Most schools in this area have everything on line. They do their homework in the cloud, get their assignments and grades through the cloud. Have to read/listen to things in the cloud, communicate with their teacher in the cloud.
Think about how many things people do everyday that require internet. It's not just a "neat" thing to have anymore.
Before the telephone you either mailed a letter or went and saw someone. Just as the telephone ( POTS ) became a utility the internet should become one now. For the same reasons.
As long as we the sheeple keep putting people in office who turn a blind eye to the shenanigans ISPs keep pulling we will continue to get those shiat sandwiches. Even if they change to honey wheat bread it's still a shiat sandwich
[ link to this | view in thread ]
price
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Could be a good thing
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Don't forget they cant
Sports networks have had the cable companies over a virtual barrel for years but it's really the cable operators, and ultimately the viewers, who have the ports networks over that same barrel. We're telling the cable operators what we want. All they have to do is push that same agenda and the sports networks will have no choice. If cable doesn't carry their events, who will?
Ideally all sporting events would just get pushed to the web so those who want to pay for them can and those who don't want to aren't forced into subsidizing something unwanted.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: price
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: And another thing
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
But I don't want to subcriber to Comcast. No no no. I don't want to subscribe either. :)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
They just don't get it.
The ads consist of various people all basically saying "No sports? Not switching.."
THAT is your differentiator? THAT is what you are going to bank your customer retention on? That you provide access to overpriced, overvalued sports networks on your basic tier? Thanks for informing me that your competition actually has a better offering! How are their demographics pointing to a larger segment of their customer base wants sports in their mandatory tier?
As Statler said to Waldorf, "SELL!"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Could be a good thing
Wouldn't straight o YouTube get more income than DVD sales?
Why not both? 'If you liked what you just watched, head over to Amazon/[Burn on demand DVD retailer] for a physical copy?'
I know I'd be willing to throw a few bucks for some of the stuff I've seen on YT if it meant having a physical copy, to reward the creators if nothing else.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
nope
they advertise 29.99 rates but add on until it is 100$ plus
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: And another thing
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: And another thing
You DO realize that without advertising & subscriber income, that either ad space pricing or subscriber income will skyrocket
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: And another thing
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Could be a good thing
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Could be a good thing
Second, many things, I mean most TV and Film, don't have that replay value.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Don't forget they cant
Second, those contracts may end someday, why keep renovating?
Third, many of those contracts are renewed every year.
Lastly, your suspicions are irrelevant. That is just a fallacy thinking.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
So yeah, the real goal is to make mobile internet a utility.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
>>> Netflix, CraveTV, Amazon Prime, YouTube Premium, and iTunes season passes
You are ridiculous.
Get a Bugatti, if it is "not always about price".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: They just don't get it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Could be a good thing
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Free media
[ link to this | view in thread ]