Amazon Pays Employees To Chirp Happily On Twitter About Wonderful Working Conditions
from the disinformation-nation dept
For several years now, there have been a parade of articles examining the "churn and burn" culture at Amazon. For example a 2015 New York Times piece profiled the "bruising" culture at the company while noting that employees weeping at their desk was not an uncommon sight. And while the profile was contested by some employees at the company, a substantial number of different reports have also highlighted the poor working conditions in Amazon distribution warehouses, including employees having to pee in garbage cans for fear of missing targets by going to a proper restroom.
Hoping to correct the "public perception" of poor working conditions at the company's warehouses, Amazon executives have crafted a new "solution" to the problem. They've started paying some warehouse employees to create Twitter accounts and speak positively of not only their working experiences, but CEO Jeff Bezos. Under the tags of "Amazon FC Ambassadors," these employees are broadly encouraged to respond to any criticism of Amazon with positivity and, apparently, copious use of emojis as they proudly insist they can pee any time they'd like:
"Autobots, transform and roll out!" Actually, if amzn did use bots to reply to social media, would be more entertaining than me 😀 At the bldg I work at I dont feel mistreated. My safety/well being are a top priority for my managers. I even get to use a real bathroom when I want
— Phil - Amazon FC Ambassador 📦 (@AmazonFCPhil) August 23, 2018
The way Amazon treats its employees is GREAT, we work hard, have fun and are always ready to make history. We have several break rooms throughout the facilities, I get two 30 mins breaks through my shift which is great.😀😎💪
— Cindi - Amazon FC Ambassador 📦 (@AmazonFCCindi) August 22, 2018
Amazon is a little bit dodgy in comments to The Guardian when it comes to admitting that these employees are being paid extra to chirp happily about their wonderful working experiences at Amazon:
"An Amazon spokesman, Ty Rogers, assured the Guardian via email that these ambassadors were real employees who work in fulfillment centers, not Twitter bots. He declined to answer questions about how the accounts were created or if employees were compensated for defending the company on social media.
“FC ambassadors are employees who understand what it’s actually like to work in our FCs,” says Rogers. “The most important thing is that they’ve been here long enough to honestly share the facts based on personal experience. It’s important that we do a good job of educating people about the actual environment inside our fulfillment centers, and the FC ambassador program is a big part of that, along with the FC tours we provide."
The employees are similarly cagey about whether they're being paid extra to speak positively about the company on Twitter:
"Asked specifically about whether they were paid extra for their Twitter service, Leo, from Jacksonville, replied: “this is just another role that I have. Right now I’m tweeting from work."
In other words, yes, your employer is paying you extra to say nice things about it. You'd hope that actual improvements to working conditions have accompanied Amazon's apparent belief that this campaign of mandatory enthusiasm was a good idea.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: ambassadors, astroturf, social media, warehouses, working conditions
Companies: amazon
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Wikipedia: Damning with faint praise
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
One-pager Zombie "stimoceiver" crawls out after 32 months!
20 comments in bit over 5 years -- half of it dormant!
These "accounts" are lightly engaged yet loyal. Never a mention let alone explanation for long gaps. Never a mention of obvious changes here, far fewer pieces and comments, because that'd point up they've come back to a clearly waning site. Never an "unlike others, I'm no zombie" that'd show recent reading. Never a mention forgot password, and boy the recovery was easy. Always blandly supportive of Techdirt's view so don't have to respond, just make a reassuring background for the few real commenters. Never acknowledgement or denial by Techdirt, but a couple ACs and suspects have tried "you're crazy" to deflect. No one will even admit that they're ODD! Because there's NO OTHER EXPLANATION than astro-turfing. But draw your own concussions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: One-pager Zombie "stimoceiver" crawls out after 32 months!
Spoken like someone who has had a few too many of those over the years.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: One-pager Zombie "stimoceiver" crawls out after 32 months!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't ask, you don't want to go down that hole
Because they are obsessed with TD and everything involved in it, to the point that they routinely check posting history of anyone and everyone that posts a comment looking for people that aren't as obsessed with the site as them in order to (somehow) bolster whatever paranoid delusion they've got kicking around.
I kinda wish I'd had an in-between account between AC and TOG honestly, just so I could occasionally post using it and have fun riling up the nutjob.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: One-pager Zombie "stimoceiver" crawls out after 32 months!
Normal people are capable of not posting on every single post every single today because they have other interests or may only have input on certain topics.
Normal people don't sit down and track the commenting histories of every user on the site to prop up an insane conspiracy which would accomplish nothing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Amazon prefers piss poor employees
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Amazon prefers piss poor employees
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Amazon prefers piss poor employees
I'll never get voted funny if I am being that subtle. "piss poor employees" means employees that aren't accumulating large amounts of urine. Well, a joke requiring an explanation is a bad joke. Better luck next time.
Is there some way to add a laugh track in Markdown? Oh wait, there is: ;-)
How unsubtle.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Of course, the real solution is to sterilize anyone stupid enough to believe online reviews or publicity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Such horror!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Section 230 immunizes social media sites from liablity for FTC violations.
What? No it does not. Social media companies are still liable for their own FTC violations. They're not liable for their users FTC violations.
This story has fuck all to do with CDA 230. Why even bring it up?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 230
Isn't it a violation of SEC rules to make false and misleading statements about the stock of a publicly traded company?
Strangely, this also has nothing to do with 230.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: 230
But unsurprisingly that hasn't stopped John "I Hate Section 230 Because I Want to Write Overly Expensive Self-Help Books But Can't Because Techdirt Will Make Fun of Me" Smith!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: 230
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: 230
Like... using his own fucking name!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The most disgusting part
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Funny...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
'Do what we say, not what we do.'
Which would probably explain the vague non-answers in response to the 'are you paying/getting paid to make those posts?', question. No-one like a hypocrite and paying employees to gush about the company while cracking down on sellers that tried to similarly game their reputations/products would leave Amazon looking all kinds of bad.
If they aren't paying the employees to make those posts, and it's in fact entirely voluntary then they really need to make that clear, the sooner the better, as not doing has good odds of making the whole thing blow up in their face.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 'Do what we say, not what we do.'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Funny...
It's all theater. All you have to do is come back with a new name.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Amazon workers on Twitter
Amazon has good reason to try to clean up its online reputation. The job market is strong, making it harder to find people to work in its warehouses. Potential employees search Twitter to learn about companies, says David Lewis, CEO of human resources consultancy OperationsInc, and positive messages could “mitigate the sting or bite” of negative ones.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Amazon workers on Twitter
That doesn't mean that what they are doing is ethical, despite how legal it may be. And now people know that the "positive" (they kinda aren't) reviews are paid, and generally people don't like that.
They're literally shills.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Amazon workers on Twitter
I mean, they'd have to either raise prices or cut into their massive profits, but...
Why is everyone laughing at me?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Amazon workers on Twitter
- LOL - this just never gets old.
"harder to find people to work in its warehouses"
- Perhaps the working conditions, pay and lack of benefits has something to do with it.
"Potential employees search Twitter to learn about companies"
- This is how people conduct a job search? Friggin hipsters!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Amazon workers on Twitter
Amazon, like most other businesses will try the cheapest route first.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Amazon workers on Twitter
Many times it is simply a ruse in order to get more H1B allocations.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The office environment rewards throwing other people under the bus. Being super aggressive and making sure others get blamed are what causes the tears and stress. You literally need to get EVERYTHING in writing else it will be used against you in some way. Ask someone to do something you need to do your job and you have no access to it? They say yes and never do it? Not in writing? Your fault. Too much work on your desk because someone else is shirking their duty? Your fault. If someone is better at fibbing than you are or making up believable stories, you will not do well at Amazon. It is why, when I get recruiters sending me requests to apply, I send them emails explaining, in depth, as to why I will never ever apply to work at Amazon. Some day they will get the hint.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That's not just Amazon, your problem is with the fact that people are dickish.
I pretty sure people were that way well before Amazon, the internet, electricity... I am pretty sure that if two cavemen worked together on a cave, one of them would get hit in the head with a large rock just after it was finished.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If the guy packing my box has to wear an adult diaper to make that happen, so be it!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Don't care what happens to others so long as you get what you want, eh?
Hell, I bet you'd sell your own grandmother.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
> > to make that happen, so be it!
> Don't care what happens to others so long as you get
> what you want, eh?
Oh, look! Another humorless fuck that can't recognize a joke when someone slaps him across the face with one.
> Hell, I bet you'd sell your own grandmother.
None left alive to sell, so much like the number of licks it takes to get to the Tootsie Roll center of a Tootsie Pop, the world may never know...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Might as well be
THEN post comment talking about how awesome the job is.'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
show ME the money
did i win?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: show ME the money
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"pee in garbage cans"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "pee in garbage cans"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "pee in garbage cans"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "pee in garbage cans"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]