Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
from the words-were-said dept
This week, both our winning comments on the insightful side come in response to Ajit Pai's whining about California's net neutrality effort — and, more specifically, in response to a commenter making the silly blanket statement that all regulation fails and governments cannot do anything right. In first place, ShadowNinja with some counterexamples:
Black and white statements like that are always wrong. There's literally tons and tons of government programs that worked great and didn't backfire in the long run. Here's just a short list of what things I can think of off the top of my head that you can thank the government for, that you can't say anything bad about how they backfired.
- Having safe food that's not laced with poison or other things that will make you sick.
- Knowing that up to $250,000 worth of assets will the safe in the event of your bank going under thanks to FDIC insurance required by law.
- Not having rivers and oceans that literally catch on fire because of how polluted they are with harmful chemicals/etc. that businesses dumped in them (yes, this really happened in the US).
- Having much cleaner air because of the same environmental regulations, and not having air so polluted that people have to wear smog masks just to go outside, and some wealthy literally go on 'clean air vacations' where it's less polluted (this is the reality today in China in a number of cities thanks to lack of regulation).
- Knowing that any car you purchase has passed rigorous government safety inspections when it was designed, and any used car you purchased was inspected as well to make sure that it's still safe to drive. Such regulations are responsible for a consistent decline in automobile accidents (which has long been the #1 killer in America).
In second place, it's Jeremy Lyman with a similar point:
I bought a gallon of milk in the grocery store last week, and I actually got a measured gallon of the listed substance for the posted price. It also didn't make me ill when I consumed it.
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/
cdrh/cfdocs/ cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=101.7 https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/
GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/Milk/default.htm I'd wager that the government does thousands of things right in your life, it's just transparent when it's running smoothly.
For editor's choice on the insightful side, we start out with one more comment from that post, this time from Anonymous Anonymous Coward and directed at one of Pai's statements:
He know what the truth is, it just won't fit in his mouth.
"Of course, those who demand greater government control of the Internet haven’t given up."
Pai's disingenuous characterization is not very subtle. In fact the demand is not for government control of the Internet, but for control over internet providers, no matter what flavor.
Control to keep the expected dumb pipes dumb. Control to encourage actual competition to keep quality high and prices low.
Control to keep those offering service honest in their advertising and billing practices.
Control to separate content from access.
Control to keep corporations from overly influencing Government in their favor rather than the owners of this country, the people.
Next, we've got a quick comment from Gary about an attempt to use the GDPR to hide a public US court document:
And also weird how the ISP is putting the pressure on the website. It's almost as if there should be some law to limit intermediary liability...
Over on the funny side, our first place winner comes after we clarified what happened with the Apple movie "deletion" kerfuffle, which turned out to be about dumb regional copyright restrictions. One commenter feared they might have to give back an earlier "most insightful" award for a comment on the subject, so Anonymous Anonymous Coward checked the criteria:
Did you move to another country?
In second place, it's one more response to the Ajit Pai post, this time from Chip in full parody mode targeting a particular commenter:
I "told" you that This would "happen"! Idiots! Sycophants! MINIONS!
I "told" you that when there were REGULATIONS, that "meant" that SOMEDAY there would be Elections, and other "people" might get "elected" and Undo the REGULATIONS. You did not Praise me for my BRILLIANCE in "understanding that Elections "exist" and sometimes different Parties get Elected, which doesn't matter anyway because oth Parties are the "same", as you would know if you were Interested in Truth and in "history" such as GEORGE WASHINGTON'S FAREWELL ADDRESS, which is one of Many historical Things that I have read because I am very "very" Smart.
The "regulations" in California are BAD, and the FCC's repeal of the REGULATIONS from Wheeler is also BAD, and Wheeler's regulations were "also" BAD. That is OBVIOUS to anyone who is very VERY "smart" like "me". Don't you Sycophantic "idiots" Get it? Someay in California there will be an ELECTION. And different PEOPLE might get "elected". And those different "people" might repeal this "law". You're all so Stupid! Stupid! for not recognizing my obvious GENIOUS in understanding that sometimes different "people" get Elected to things. You did not learn about History like I learne about History, at Smilin' Jim's Unaccredited Forth Grade Academy.
Every Nation eats the Paint chips it Deseves!
For editor's choice on the funny side, we start out with another comment from Gary, this time in response to the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce engaging in some trademark bullying over the Hollywood sign:
Hey isn't Hollywood that obscure California city that all those film studios moved to in order to escape draconian patent lawsuits from Edison?
And finally, it's an anonymous comment about Tanzania's plan to outlaw the fact-checking of government statistics:
Statistics show that 100% of leaders who demonize fact-checking are honest and deserve to be reelected.
That's all for this week, folks!
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I didn’t realize there even was a problem. This is what I get for using a custom userstyle on TD…
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's De-deregulation week here at Techdirt.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Most John-Oliverian Content of the Week by TD staff goes to Tim Cushing for:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Think of all the problems we wouldn't have now if that office were filled by the winner of the popular vote instead. Or if we simply hadn't allowed Republicans to gerrymander voting districts to their hearts content for the past several decades.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
FUNNIEST BY FAR: PIRATES ATTACKING PIRATES!
https://torrentfreak.com/ettv-feeds-eztv-fake-torrents-stop-ridding-our-releases-180922/
"our content". Which they've stolen from those who paid for it.
And "freeloading scum".
How utterly disgusting that these outright thieves claim proprietary right to stolen content, using the very terms that apply to them. -- It's projection and displacement again, the identifying characteristic of those who aren't honest.
With the legitimate owners now putting pressure on enough pirate sites, the thieves are turning on each other. Good. Need more. They've become so money-mad that a little undercover bribery to rat out each other will help all to places in jail.
See also: "Reddit Gets Tough With Multiple Bans of Piracy Sub-Reddits"
Caused by recent court cases holding liable for NOT having an effective repeat-infringer policy. So turns out that even Reddit is bound to police the site as copyright cop, just as I've said: corporations are permitted entities that can exist only after agreed have SOME duty to enforce laws.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: FUNNIEST BY FAR: PIRATES ATTACKING PIRATES!
Guess who's a total and complete liar? It's you!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just a part of their nature.
Birds fly.
Blue lies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bye Felicia!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: FUNNIEST BY FAR: PIRATES ATTACKING PIRATES!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You're not really one to criticize others for alleged selective reading, blue boy.
SESTA voted.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
FDIC
It could be said that FDIC insurance has already backfired. It effectively makes bank accounts into commodities—the products are all the same, and you just use whichever gives you the best deal. If it seems too good to be true, that's not your problem.
I'm not saying people who chose wrong should lose all their money, but there is a moral hazard here (Wikipedia has some citations on the "Deposit insurance" page). There were 320 banks that behaved recklessly enough in last decade's financial crisis to need an FDIC bailout.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]