AT&T's 5G 'Arrives,' Quickly Shows Why 5G Won't Be A Panacea For Broadband Competition
from the blistering-hype dept
We've talked a lot about how while fifth-generation "5G" wireless will deliver faster and lower latency networks, its role as some kind of broadband panacea has been severely over-hyped. For one, it's going to take years before users actually see a healthy selection of actual 5G devices in the wild (Apple's 5G iPhone won't launch until 2020 or later). And despite carrier promises, deploying these upgrades to traditionally ignored rural and less affluent urban markets will take years.
Even then, these same companies' monopoly over cell tower connectivity in many areas will only ensure prices remain high. That's all compounded by the looming Sprint, T-Mobile merger, which will reduce the number of overall competitors in wireless from four to three, something that never ends well for price competition should you actually bother to study telecom history (especially US telecom history).
None of this has stopped wireless carriers, network gear makers, and stenographing news outlets from heralding 5G as an almost mystical panacea. A panacea that's going to single-handedly birth the smart cities and cars of tomorrow and result in us all (I'm told) working four day work weeks. Of course more quietly, even Wall Street has acknowledged that many of these promises are over-hyped as even initial 5G marketing tech demos under deliver on unrealistic industry promises. To be clear 5G is a good thing. But it's not fucking magic.
This week, AT&T made a lot of waves by announcing it will be the first to "launch" 5G next week in select cities. Even AT&T, a company with a bad habit of redefining what a "launched" broadband market actually means, chose its words carefully in terms of managing user expectations:
"We've worked closely with our technology suppliers to reach this mobile 5G milestone. While the initial launch starts small and will be limited, as the 5G ecosystem evolves customers will see enhancements in coverage, speeds and devices.
"This is the first taste of the mobile 5G era," said Andre Fuetsch, president, AT&T Labs and chief technology officer. "Being first, you can expect us to evolve very quickly. It's early on the 5G journey and we're ready to learn fast and continually iterate in the months ahead."
The caveats aren't subtle. For one, the new 5G service is only initially going to be made available to users who pony up $500 for a mobile hotspot. And while the service should offer some impressive speeds (depending on regional congestion and throttling) for $70 per month, the service comes with a 15 GB usage cap that all-but ensures the line can't really be used as a replacement for a traditional fixed-line connection. AT&T can't be bothered to explain in its press release what happens when you surpass that usage threshold (I've inquired), but you'll either be subject to throttling or steep, additional per gigabyte penalties.
Of course this is all before AT&T imposes all manner of zero rating and other tricks that could potentially give its own Time Warner content an unfair advantage in the market, the degree of which depends on whether AT&T and friends win next February's looming net neutrality court battle. Should they win that fight, the door is open to not only implementing all manner of underhanded, anti-competitive restrictions, but thanks to the Pai FCC dismantling of transparency requirements, there's no real punishment for failing to make those limitations clear to the end user.
Historically, telecom giants like AT&T, Verizon, and Comcast do absolutely everything in their power to avoid having to seriously compete on price. They also simply adore erecting entirely arbitrary and unnecessary limitations, then charging customers an arm and a leg to avoid them. So while 5G will generally be a positive force (in the sense that faster, more resilient networks are always good), anybody who thinks it won't suffer from most of the same problems plaguing current American networks hasn't been paying attention.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Dial Up Throttling Once Surpass Threshold.
If it is anything like my AT&T phone hotspot, it will be:
Almost guarantee this will be the same. Welcome to dial up speeds on your new 5G plan.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
LIONS WILL LAY DOWN WITH LAMBS!!!
And I'll watch 2 Netflix movies and then need to wait 30 days to get my next ration of bandwidth.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
5G?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I'll just use my 5G data aaaaaaannnndddd it's gone.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: 5G?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Its range is low compared with 4g, it,ll need
3-4 times the amount of cell towers that 3g use,s .Its likely to be more expensive for the customer
,someone has to pay for all that new equipment .
5g phones will probably be more expensive than
4g phones .
I think its like 3d tv it may be rejected or ignored
by most consumers unless its faster and competes
on price with 3g broadband .
It may take 5-7 years to be avaidable in all
area,s outside citys .
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: 5G?
https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-R/study-groups/rsg5/rwp5d/imt-2020/Documents/S01-1_Requirements%20for %20IMT-2020_Rev.pdf
[ link to this | view in thread ]
5G is intended to enslave us even more
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: 5G?
Looks like the ITU's wishlist for year 2020 service. If 5G was mentioned in there, my old eyes lost it in the text-over-background in the PDF.
Used to be IEEE issued the Standards for computer network communications. Looks like ITU is handling radio/computer now.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: 5G is intended to enslave us even more
Its because they can use it to control your brain. Our brain cells work by tiny electircal impulses. What is wifi? ELECTRICITY!
You step into a restaurant around noon and BOOM! Suddenly you are hungry for lunch. think that happened by chance? NO SIR! Its the free wifi invading your brain and controlling your thoughts.
FREE YOURSELF! Dialup is the way to go. The scream of your computer as it connects to the internet is the sound of you breaking the chains that the corporate overlords have placed on your PC. Relish it every day.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: 5G is intended to enslave us even more
Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanie
https://zapatopi.net/afdb/
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: 5G is intended to enslave us even more
I only trust locally sourced foil hats mined during autumn at the break of dawn by Sasquatch and his wife.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
SOP-Standard operational procedure...
its SOP..and 90% of us wont get it, wont use it, Cant use it, think its dumb, have found other alternatives(until they kill that one)...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Dial Up Throttling Once Surpass Threshold.
Almost. If you do the math, you can get a bit more than 15GB/month on 53.3K dialup (about 17-18 GB).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Dial Up Throttling Once Surpass Threshold.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Dial Up Throttling Once Surpass Threshold.
mmmuuahahahahahahahaha!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: 5G?
Maybe I'm mistaken but I thought IMT-2020 was the specification for 5G. Wikipedia says:
Note the "citation needed" for the IMT-2020 stuff. I thought it would be easy to find the spec, but that turned out not to be the case. Maybe something in the references or external links of the WP article will be what you're looking for. I didn't look through all 78 of them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Verizon?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
De-Regulation is a good thing.
Removal of oversight and barriers do allow the market to move faster and provide more services. In this case, 5G will be available both faster and without requiring AT&T to invest vast amounts of money on equipment upgrades.
Now, repeat after me. The system is fixed! The system is fixed!
Now, go celebrate.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: De-Regulation is a good thing.
Do you have evidence for that? Keeping in mind of course that correlation does not imply causation.
[ link to this | view in thread ]