Troll Lawyer Shows Up In Court To Explain His 'Dead Grandfather' Excuse, Gets His 'Fitness To Practice' Questioned By The Judge
from the putting-the-'lie'-back-in-'Liebowitz' dept
Just a few days ago, copyright troll lawyer Richard Liebowitz was being threatened with jail time for refusing to provide a judge with some evidence his grandfather had died. If that doesn't seem like something most judges would demand, you're right. It takes a special kind of lawyer to drive a federal court judge to start demanding proof of death from an attorney.
Liebowitz had blown off a discovery conference. When called on it, he claimed his grandfather had died on April 12th, forcing him to miss the scheduled conference. The judge had other reasons to doubt Liebowitz's claim -- like other screwing around he had performed during this litigation, as well as his short, but colorful (read: sanction-heavy) litigation career.
This information was demanded again and again by the judge. Liebowitz again and again refused to provide documentation of his grandfather's death. Sanctions were handed down, rising from $100/day to $500/day as Liebowitz continued to refuse to respond to the judge's order. The judge gave Liebowitz one more chance to turn up in court with the proper paperwork. If he failed to do so, he was to be arrested.
Since then, there have been a couple of developments. William Bastone of The Smoking Gun managed to find evidence of Liebowitz's grandfather's demise.
A TSG investigation has determined that Liebowitz’s maternal grandfather did, in fact, die in April. But not on April 12, the Friday morning he failed to appear before Seibel.
Jaime Radusky, 93, died on April 9 at Weill Cornell Medical Center on Manhattan’s Upper East Side. Radusky, a Cuban émigré, lived in a penthouse apartment about 10 blocks from the hospital where he died. In the above Facebook photo, Radusky is seen poolside at the Miami Beach condominium complex where he owned a unit.
Details of Radusky’s death are contained in a probate petition filed in Surrogate's Court in Manhattan by the two executors of Radusky’s estate, his son Henry Radusky and daughter Sara Liebowitz (Richard Liebowitz’s mother). Additionally, an affidavit sworn by an attorney representing Radusky’s heirs reported that, “The decedent died on April 9, 2019.”
So, the excuse wasn't complete bullshit. But it was still mostly bullshit. Liebowitz swore repeatedly in multiple declarations that his grandfather died on April 12th. That was his excuse for missing the April 12th discovery conference. Liebowitz had a legitimate reason for missing this conference -- the recent death of his grandfather -- but for some insane reason, chose to give the judge the wrong date and spend the next six months adamantly swearing this falsehood was the truth.
Liebowitz's last-ditch excuse -- a filing that included some rather audacious assertions about the judge's alleged inability to do her job -- said the death of his grandfather was "too private" to be discussed in court. There's not much that's private about death. His grandfather's death certificate is handed out to a number of government agencies to end benefits payments, cancel voter registrations, and -- in this case -- allow the state court to appoint a legal guardian for his grandfather's surviving wife.
There's more to this story. The Smoking Gun showed up in court for Liebowitz's "tell me why I shouldn't throw your ass in jail" hearing. This time, Richard Liebowitz showed up as well. Liebowitz showed up with representation. Good call. Not only was he facing possible jail time, but he had proven in this case (and multiple others) he probably shouldn't ever represent himself, much less clients. It did not go well for the copyright troll lawyer.
[Judge Cathy] Seibel stated that Liebowitz knew he was lying about the date of his grandfather’s death, but “chose to repeat that lie six, eight, ten times” in court filings that the jurist said were part of a “long-term campaign of deception.” Liebowitz, Seibel remarked, “double-downed, triple-downed, quadrupled-downed, octupled-down, I don’t know what would come after that.”
“I question Mr. Liebowitz’s fitness to practice,” Seibel said at one point during the hearing.
There are many, many good reasons to question Liebowitz's fitness to practice. This debacle is just the latest reason. Liebowitz has only been practicing for five years, but he's been sanctioned multiple times and his shady litigation strategies have resulted in several orders to post high-dollar bonds before his clients' cases can proceed.
His short history is catching up to him. It's going to be a bit more difficult for Liebowitz to flood courts with speculative invoices.
Noting the significance of a lawyer who “intentionally lies to the court,” Seibel said she has referred the Liebowitz matter to the Grievance Committee for review and possible disciplinary sanctions. Seibel added that her contempt rulings against Liebowitz will require him to disclose the sanctions to other courts and prospective clients.
Good. This kind of litigation -- threatening people with statutory damages and long, expensive litigation to extract quick settlements -- is garbage. So are the people who practice it and profit from it. Liebowitz hasn't been around long, but he seems determined to make the Prendas of the world look just a tiny bit better by comparison. If he's forced to disclose his checkered courtroom past before approaching judges or clients, there will be fewer of each willing to entertain his bullshit.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cathy siebel, copyright, copyright trolls, lies, richard liebowitz, sanctions
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Much disappointment...
...that he's not rotting in a jail cell.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Much disappointment...
I think its a reasonable sanction. His grandfather did die, the court is going to adjudicate his claims of a need of time to grieve. The court was sanctioning the lies, and particularly repeating and octupoling down on the lies. But hes been sanctioned at least $8000.00 already. Additional Jail time might not play well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Much disappointment...
His grandfather did die, the court is going to adjudicate his claims of a need of time to grieve.
Yeah, if you really believe that he gave the wrong date that just so happened to coincide with a hearing that went poorly for him, and then lied about it for months because he was overcome with grief I've got some great bridges to sell you.
Had he missed the hearing and then admitted afterwards that his grandfather had recently died and it hit him hard enough and/or imposed time-sensitive requirements that he not only couldn't show but couldn't remember to inform the court he wouldn't be able to show that would have been one thing, but as the judge noted in her teardown of him his lying for months was anything but accidental. He knew he was lying but rather than own it and apologize he kept doing it.
But hes been sanctioned at least $8000.00 already.
Which sure seems to have taught him not to lie in court, no?
Sanctions are clearly not cutting it, he just shrugs them off and continues his schemes, at this point jail time seems more than justified for repeated instances of perjury, though I'd be perfectly fine with no jail time if instead he lost his license as blatantly unfit to practice.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
who'da thunk it
A copyright troll lawyer lying to court.
I'd never have believed it, except for the fact that the entire litigation strategy relies on such things.
At this point, perhaps we need to change the stereotype of scummy lawyers from ambulance chasers, to Copyright cronies
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
On one hand, his not being put in jail ruins much of the entertainment factor for this case.
On the other hand, basically being told that his legal career may as well be over is almost equally as entertaining.
Gotta love schadenfreude! 🍿
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Best is Yet to Come
Leonard French (from Lawful Masses with Leonard French) went to the hearing as well. The Judge is only really issuing sanctions to remedy the immediate situation in front of her (failing to follow her orders). However, he's been referred to the Court's Grievance Office and Liebowitz's bar. Those two offices get to issue their own sanctions. The pattern of his behaviour in other cases would carry more weight with his bar. However, it can take awhile for them to do their investigation and Liebowitz would have a chance to defend himself and offer to take remedial actions. This story isn't done yet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Did he pay his sanctions?
Both articles (TechDirt and The Smoking Gun) are silent about the monetary sanctions. By my count, Liebowitz owes the clerk of the court a few thousand dollars.
Any word on if he ponied up?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Did he pay his sanctions?
According to Leonard French’s podcast he did pay up, but was $100 short which the judge forgave. I think because he is literally incapable of not fucking up everything he touches.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Love that his own attorney said Liebowitz “was not dealing with a full deck.” My guess is that he gets suspended for at least 6 months.
That being said, comparing his practice to Prenda is not quite fair. Liebowtiz’s clients are real photographers and the people he sues are real businesses who should not be using images without a license.
Isn’t the entire criminal justice system predicated on the idea of “threatening people with statutory damages and long, expensive litigation to extract quick settlements”? If copyright holders are forced to police their own work, why should they not negotiate the same way?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
As a lawyer who has had to deal with Liebowitz before, I can tell you that not all of his clients are real photographers with real claims.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I feel bad the guys grandfather died. My step-grandfather and uncle died in one week many years ago and it was not a fun or productive time for other pursuits.
Getting a quick settlement on a claim is not in and of itself a bad thing.
Is there any evidence that he or his clients considered lawful reasons to be accessing online information even if they consider it fringe?
The normal troll stereotype implies they don't care if there were a great number of fair use cases or mistaken identity cases from alleged infringing IP addresses. They also don't care about the difference between commercial and non-commercial conduct. Those are the practices I find objectionable about the copyright trolling industry.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
But... why did he feel the need to lie about it, and then continue to lie about it? That's what makes this whole episode so odd.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not odd. He's a lying copyright troll. Lying and misrepresenting is what they do.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
What make Libeowitz a troll is that he files far more cases than he is capable of taking care of, and has been sanctioned multiple times for lying to the court and failing to follow proper procedure. Most of his clients probably have valid claims, however he does not have what we would call the “bandwidth” to adjudicate properly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
What makes him a troll is that he demands outrageous license terms, turning down offers of the going rate, or even just over the going rate. He doesn't want the going rate, he want 100X the going rate, and THAT makes him a troll.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I am not sure what you mean by going rate, but If you mean the normal licensing rate, that would be silly. Copyright law is meant to be punitive and discourage infringement and it makes no sense to give someone who stole an image the same price as someone who did the right thing and paid for it.
Now a 100X multiplier is probably excessive in most cases.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Copyright law is meant to incentivize creation. If authors want to protect their works, they can register the work within three months of publication and get statutory damages. Otherwise, actual damages such as a comparable licensing fee is the appropriate measure of damages under he law.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I don’t think this makes him a troll, but rather just a bad manager of his law practice.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
In my opinion he uses the same business model that Rightshaven and Prenda used. Hence troll.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Liebowitz might have had some sympathy there, if not for the following points:
The glorious heroes of copyright took a diarrhea dump in the bed they made and now they have to lie in it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
We don't know what was going on in his head.
It is conceivable that he learned of his grandfather's death on the 12th and missed the hearing because he was simply distracted by grief. He may have learned of the death on the 9th and been so distracted with grief that he missed a hearing three days later. When initially asked, he may simply have not been in the right mindset because of his grief and gave a poor accounting of what and when things happened. After that, he may have been embarrassed or afraid of the ramifications of giving the wrong date and kept hoping the court would just let it go.
Or, he may have not cared at all for his grandfather, missed the hearing because of something else, and simply used the dead grandfather as an excuse.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What I don't get...
Here's what I don't understand... In this particular case, doing the right thing - spending two minutes to send an email asking to reschedule the discovery conference - would have been far easier than the path he chose. Even after he missed it, he could have explained that it slipped his mind due to his grandfather's death (with the correct date of death), and nobody would have given it a second thought.
Instead, he chooses to lie to the court, and then double, triple, and quadruple-down on the lie when called on it. That cost him a pretty penny and potentially his livelihood if he's disbarred over this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What I don't get...
Seibel said that it seemed Liebowitz thought that if he could drag the court proceedings out, that she would lose interest in him. Referring to the “multiple lies” offered by Liebowitz, Seibel said, “I’m sure he’s disappointed I didn’t go away.”
The judge proposed one possible explanation, that he was hoping that if he just dragged it on long enough she'd get tired of the whole thing and drop it, and I'd add another possible explanation of ego, in that once he made the first lie he simply couldn't admit to having lied and instead just kept digging.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: What I don't get...
And this is why serial liars shouldn't be placed in positions of trust and power.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: What I don't get...
Unfortunately, a great many of them still get elected to public office.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And I'm sure that disclosing his own incompetence ain't gonna "slip his mind".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Oh I'm sure he'll get around to it... eventually... might take a few months and threats of jail time but he'll almost certainly remember at some point.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Considering how pissed this judge is at him, it's probably better if he doesn't forget. I'm sure she'll make him regret it if she has ti file them for him.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
From the pictures on Twitter ("many, many good reasons" link) you can see he's got Trump's haircut, soon to be known as the "Liar's Haircut".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You only get to use 'dead grandfather' for an excuse twice unless one or more of your parents divorced or remarried then I guess you could use it up to eight or more times!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: White privilege
My thught exactly. If a black kid, after speeding on their newly bought bicycle, had been just one tenth as arrogant as Liebowitz here, they would have been sent to jail with no second thoughts, and if they cried too loudly about it they might also happen to be shot.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: White privilege
Commented on the wrong page.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]