Turkish Government Finally Lifts Wikipedia Ban
from the you-lost,-losers dept
More than two years ago, the Turkish government blocked all of Wikipedia under the dubious legal theory it was a "threat to national security." A single offending article that linked the Turkish government to various terrorist organizations was the "threat" Turkey felt it couldn't withstand.
Wikipedia challenged this blanket ban -- which covered all of its domains, not just the Turkish version. It appealed the decision in Turkey and petitioned the European Court of Human Rights to declare the government's ban a violation of free speech rights.
The ECHR seemed inclined to give Wikipedia what it asked for. But securing a win wouldn't be enough to lift the ban. Turkey has routinely blown off ECHR verdicts, choosing to keep its human rights violations in place in exchange for periodic fines.
Unfortunately, for Recep Erdogan and his government, another decision was handed down that wasn't so easily ignored. In late December of last year, the country's top court ruled the ban was a violation of freedom of expression rights. It took a few weeks for the government to comply with the order, but the Wikimedia Foundation reports the ban has finally been lifted.
Today, on Wikipedia’s 19th birthday, the Wikimedia Foundation has received reports that access to Wikipedia in Turkey is actively being restored.* This latest development follows a 26 December 2019 ruling by the Constitutional Court of Turkey that the more than two and a half year block imposed by the Turkish government was unconstitutional. Earlier today, the Turkish Constitutional Court made the full text of that ruling available to the public, and shortly after, we received reports that access was restored to Wikipedia.
This win doesn't mean Wikipedia is dropping its ECHR petition. Even if Turkey is unlikely to comply with an ECHR ruling, another declaration of access to Wikipedia as a basic human right will make it a little more difficult for the Turkish government to institute another ban the next time it's offended.
So far, the security of the Turkish nation appears to be as intact as it ever was. Considering the government's unimpaired access to any number of media outlets, it would seem the best thing the country could have done is fight Wikipedia's speech with speech of its own. But that's never enough for authoritarians like Recep Erdogan who use a great deal of their power to silence critics under the guise of securing the nation.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I'll just leave this here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gollum
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'll just leave this here
I came here to ask if that was accessible from Turkey on Wikipedia. Glad I'm not the only one!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
'Waaaah! They're saying stuff I don't like!'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Governments the world over are doing the same thing thanks to the thin-skinned narcissists at the helm of each. It's not so easy to dismiss Erdogan when the leaders of Thailand, USA and several others are also actively trying to shut down any kind of dissent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Prudent amnesia
I could not resist looking up "Lord of the Rings" ("Yüzüklerin Efendisi")
in the Turkish-language Wikipedia.
A certain character who should not be named is omitted from an otherwise comprehensive list of characters:
https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yüzüklerin_Efendisi#Karakterler
Said character is mentioned briefly in the plot summary, which curiously stops at the end of Volume I (after which it would be difficult to avoid mentioning said character repeatedly).
There is, however, a brief article (stub) about said character, which prudently omits any ("in popular culture") mention of current controversies.
Snickering aside, however, we should resist any temptation to edit such articles. The more internationally-interested Turks who would maintain and read them have enough problems keeping access to the World, without foreign provocateurs adding to them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Prudent amnesia
I miss the days when politicians wanted to be on Spitting Image as a sign that they'd arrived. https://i1.wp.com/metro.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/spitting-image-2338.jpg
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Prudent amnesia
Perhaps this is where it got its Genesis https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlBIa8z_Mts
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wikipedia is awful.
I would ban it too for the crap that gets put on it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Like what? What is so awful about it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]