Dish's Wireless Network, A Cornerstone of the T-Mobile Merger, Is Already On Shaky Ground

from the empty-promises dept

If you recall, the biggest downside of the $26 billion Sprint T-Mobile merger was the fact that the deal would dramatically reduce overall competition in the U.S. wireless space. Data from around the globe clearly shows that the elimination of one of just four major competitors results in layoffs and higher prices due to less competition. It's not debatable. Given U.S. consumers already pay some of the highest prices for mobile data in the developed world, most objective experts recommended that the deal be blocked.

It wasn't. Instead, the Trump FCC rubber stamped the deal before even seeing impact studies. And the DOJ not only ignored the recommendations of its staff, but DOJ "antitrust" boss Makan Delrahim personally helped guide the deal's approval process via personal phone and email accounts. Both agencies, and the vocal chorus of telecom-linked industry allies, all behaved as if all of this was perfectly legitimate and not grotesquely corrupt.

At the heart of the DOJ's approval was a flimsy proposal that involved giving Dish Network some T-Mobile spectrum in the hopes that, over even years, they'd be able to build out a replacement fourth carrier. As we noted at the time there was very little chance this plan was ever going to work.

One, Dish (and CEO Charlie Ergen) have a long history of empty promises in wireless. He'd been accused (including by T-Mobile previously) of simply hoarding valuable spectrum and stringing along feckless, captured regulators for years with an eye on cashing out once the spectrum's value had appreciated. Two, AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile are all heavily incentivized to make sure this proposal never got off the ground. Three, the current FCC has yet to stand up to industry on a single issue of substance, would never engage in the kind of nannying required to usher Dish's plan from pipe dream to major network.

But with the pandemic, it's not even clear we're going to get to that part of the program. Reports now indicate that the pandemic and quarantine may have scuttled Dish's plans for financing and deployment, even if Ergen hadn't been bluffing. The complaints are largely coming from unsourced Wall Street insiders, but they're certainly right that funding the T-Mobile merger's deus ex machina just got notably more complicated:

"Ergen, the billionaire chairman of satellite-TV company Dish Network, needs to raise about $10 billion to build a 5G network that covers 70 percent of the US population by June 2023, fulfilling his part of a regulatory agreement that allowed Sprint to be acquired by T-Mobile on April 1.

But with the coronavirus wreaking havoc on the economy and drying up lending, Wall Street is predicting Ergen will fall behind — fast.

“I think whatever rosy projections Charlie had are now very questionable,” said a source who expected to be part Dish’s lending group. “There is no financing to build a telecom network."

Some analysts still seem to think Ergen could pull it off. But again, they're the same analysts who ignored red flags about Ergen's history, and all of the greasy corruption required to bring this merger to fruition in the first place:

"Two months of severe market uncertainty doesn’t really alter my view of a company to execute on a three-year plan,” Lightshed Partners Analyst Walt Piecyk told The Post, saying it is too soon to question if Ergen will meet the deadline.

But even just a few months of delay could put Dish in a worse spot financially as it‘s already the clear laggard among the four wireless networks, making for a riskier loan profile, sources said."

COVID-19 certainly does make financing and building a major wireless network difficult. But if Ergen was bluffing all along, the crisis will provide wonderful cover for Ergen to back out of a deal. That said, even if the network somehow does get built and become a major wireless replacement for Sprint, analysis suggests the end network would result in around 100 million fewer people in range of service than if we'd left Sprint intact. And that's in an ideal, non-pandemic world.

Most objective experts knew this merger was a turd, and the Dish effort was doomed to failure with the slightest disruption likely throwing a wrench in the works. But we rubber stamped the deal anyway. And by nearly every metric, history will remember the entire saga as little more than greedy imbecile theater while consumers and employees share the brunt of the inevitable fallout.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: charlie ergen, competition, covid-19, mergers, wireless
Companies: dish, sprint, t-mobile


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    OldMugwump (profile), 15 Apr 2020 @ 7:13am

    STARLINK IS COMING

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 15 Apr 2020 @ 8:39am

      Re: STARLINK IS COMING

      Starlink is too dangerous to ever come to market. I'm certain that the competitors will pay off whoever they need too in order to kill it off before it affects their market share.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 15 Apr 2020 @ 9:06am

        Re: Re: STARLINK IS COMING

        Starlink will have minimal impact in the cities, where telcos can make a lot of money, but will be useful for the rural areas, where the telcos cannot be bothered to keep the copper network working properly. Also, from what I understand of antenna requirement, you might fit Starlink to a truck or camper, or even put one in you backpack to set up a link in remote locations, you will not be using it from a handheld device.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        OldMugwump (profile), 15 Apr 2020 @ 3:10pm

        Re: Re: STARLINK IS COMING

        Mr. Musk has a long history now of delivering on his promises.

        Late, usually. But eventually.

        360 satellites have already been launched; 60 more are scheduled to launch April 23. That represents a lot of investment (not mostly Musk's money, but his investors).

        That's a lot of satellites, and a lot of money invested. Already.

        I think it's going to happen.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 15 Apr 2020 @ 8:52am

      Re: STARLINK IS COMING

      So is the year 2027. I'm not holding my breath for either one.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 15 Apr 2020 @ 9:26am

        Re: Re: STARLINK IS COMING

        At least if you hold your breath for 2027 you know with certainty that you will eventually be able to breathe again.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 15 Apr 2020 @ 12:01pm

    in the hopes that, over even years, they'd be able to build out a replacement fourth carrier.

    Karl, assuming that they'll only take the odd years off is a bold assumption.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 16 Apr 2020 @ 1:01am

    Starlink News

    NEW YORK, NY—When Jeffrey Walton tested positive for COVID-19, he hoped for a speedy recovery. But since he has been treated with hydroxychloroquine, the experimental treatment President Donald Trump has been touting, he now hopes he dies quickly to help prove that Trump is an idiot.

    While Trump has been giving people hope that hydroxychloroquine could save lives, his political opponents have called it false hope and claimed Trump has no idea what he’s talking about. Walton, a lifelong Democrat and progressive, had joined in calling Trump “irresponsible” and an “ignoramus” and now has an opportunity to prove it by simply dying. “It’s such an opportunity, I don’t want to pass it up,” Walton said.

    Doctor Glenn Logan, Walton’s physician, says he’s been up and down. “After we gave him the hydroxychloroquine, he got really excited about the idea of dying to prove Trump is dumb, and his good mood helped his condition, and he started to improve. Because that would only help Trump, his getting healthier made him depressed, which caused his condition to deteriorate. Which made him really happy. Which helped him recover and... Well, it’s been a weird cycle.”

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.