Cambodian Government Using Fake News Law To Silence Critics And Coronavirus Reporting
from the redefining-speech-protections-to-protect-the-gov't-against-speech dept
In 2018, Cambodia's government passed a "fake news" law. It was enacted shortly before a general election, allowing the government to stifle criticism of the Prime Minister. It also required all local websites to register with the government and put government employees to work scouring social media for violations.
The government's new power to decide what is or isn't "real" news allowed it to consolidate its power over the local press. One newspaper was sold to a Malaysian firm that also performed PR work for the Prime Minister, giving the PM the ability to produce news unlikely to ever be classified as "fake."
The appearance of the coronavirus in Cambodia has resulted in a spike in "fake news" arrests. A crisis like this shouldn't be allowed to go to waste and the Cambodian government is making the most of its new powers to silence critics, stifle dissent, and punish anyone who doesn't have nice things to say about the party in power.
Human Rights Watch documented 30 arbitrary arrests between late January and April 2020. Fourteen people remain in pretrial detention, apparently on baseless charges, including incitement, conspiracy, incitement of military personnel to disobedience, and spreading false information or “fake news.” Among those arrested in addition to the opposition activists was a journalist quoting a speech by Prime Minister Hun Sen, and ordinary Cambodians who criticized the government’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic. The authorities released two on bail, one of whom was hospitalized. Their charges remain pending.
Part of this effort is apparently meant to deter citizens from reporting accurately about the spread of infection. Cambodia reported 122 positive cases but also claims there have been no new positive COVID-19 tests in the past 16 days. It appears the government wants its citizens -- and perhaps the rest of the world -- to believe the threat has passed, or is, at least, firmly under control. Many of those arrested were accused of posting "fake news" about COVID-19 to social media.
Even directly quoting the Prime Minister appears to be a crime under this law, as well as the new powers the government handed to itself by declaring a state of emergency.
On April 7, Phnom Penh police arrested an online journalist, Sovann Rithy, for allegedly “stirring chaos by quoting from a Hun Sen speech: “If motorbike-taxi drivers go bankrupt [because of the pandemic], sell your motorbikes for spending money. The government does not have the ability to help.” The authorities charged Rithy with “incitement to commit a felony” and ordered his detention at Phnom Penh’s Police Judiciare detention facility. The Information Ministry revoked the license for his online broadcasting site, TVFB, on grounds that Rithy had broadcast information “to generate an adverse effect on the security, public order and safety of society.”
This is the way "fake news" laws are used. Very rarely do these laws target anyone spreading false information. They're almost always used to silence criticism and allow governments to control the narrative. The President of the United States popularized the term "fake news," and almost every single use of the term by Trump refers to press coverage or press outlets he doesn't personally like. It has nothing to do with the accuracy of their reporting. The same goes elsewhere in the world, but the idea to treat "fake news" as a crime, rather than protected expression, is a lot easier to enact in countries where free speech protections are more minimal. And once these laws are enacted, they'll be in place forever.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cambodia, covid-19, fake news, free speech, politics
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Do as we say, not as we do.
I would call it funny how authoritarian governments around the world are so afraid of free speech, if it wasn't so horrifying. I don't have the same compunction for power that they seem to have, so I don't understand it. I recognize it, but I don't understand it.
These psychopaths don't seem to realize that their populations will only stand for this for so long before they do something about it. Yes those in power tend to have the military and police on their side, but at some point, the non psychopaths in those ranks might come to understand how the policies exhibited impact their friends and families. The question then will be how to go about replacing governments with non-psychopaths, something even we haven't figured out yet.
Yes there a a couple of totalitarian regimes that have managed to exist for quite a while now, but things change, and the rate of change is ever increasing. It is only a matter of time, how much time is unknown.
Jailing and/or killing those that speak truth to power only creates martyrs for the cause, something those in power actually don't want. How they will react when they come to this realization will be interesting to watch, but I doubt I will still be around when it happens (too old and there is no current expectation for this to happen quickly).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
1984 would be proud. George Orwell not so much
With 'fake news' defined pretty much from the outset as 'speech that those in power don't like' while it's disgusting to see it used like this it is sadly not in any way surprising.
'Fake news' laws have never been, and never will be, about protecting the public, they are there to protect the powerful from those that would speak against them or say things that might be 'inconvenient' and should be seen and treated as such.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
those concerned obviously had some very good teachers. cant imagine who!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Truth and Sci-fi
Dont ya love it.
the real fun part is reversing WHO to point fingers at.
Insted of pointing them at the Lower masses of people, and very little of those in the middle. Much concern is that those lower are confused by those on the upper levels of Society and gov. and corps.
Without Clarification from above, what do we have below? We get to Guess and comment and make opinions. And those above Come down and Beat us in the head for Their incompetence.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The "fake news" wasn't coined by the US. The gov of Cambodia appears to be correct that large parts of the coverage of it are misleading enough to be fake even if it's all mostly true at some level.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[citation needed]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Leave
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
New Headline
Cambodian PM tortures and kills citizens accused of producing 'fake news'.
(If the UK government bends over to Cambodian extradition demands as readily as it does those of the US, that's my summer holiday/vacation sorted despite the lockdown!)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]