The TikTok Oracle Grift: Insiders Admit They Went Hunting For A Tech Company The President Liked
from the because-of-course dept
Earlier this week we wrote about the absolute grift involved in the TikTok / Oracle deal. Contrary to the framing that this was Oracle "buying" TikTok to satisfy the President's unconstitutional demand that the Chinese company ByteDance sell TikTok to an American company, the story showed that this was just a hosting deal for Oracle's cloud service, which is way down the list of top cloud providers.
The end result was no actual sale (though the Treasury Department is still "reviewing" the deal), but a big contract for Oracle, and a bogus story in which the President can pretend he forced ByteDance to "sell" TikTok, even though it retains ownership in the company (there are some rumors that the hosting deal will include a small, and probably symbolic, equity stake for Oracle).
The other key point I noted in my article was that Oracle's executive leadership, starting with Larry Ellison, but including CEO Safra Catz, have been cozying up to Trump and the White House ever since Trump became President. While much of Silicon Valley's executive teams have made it quite clear how uncomfortable they are with a Trump Presidency, Oracle... has done the opposite. And while I framed it as being convenient that things worked out this way, a report from the Wall Street Journal highlights how this was the grift from day one.
Oracle was originally brought into the negotiations to provide an alternative to Microsoft Corp., a rival bidder with Walmart as a partner, said one person familiar with the talks. The U.S. investment firms Sequoia Capital and General Atlantic, which are existing investors in ByteDance, went in search of a tech company with close ties to the administration and settled on Oracle, the person said.
As we discussed earlier, from day one of this silly ordeal, the President made it clear he would steer a deal to a company he personally liked (meaning one where the leadership licked his boots, apparently). After all, after first saying that he was going to block TikTok in the US, as rumors of Microsoft's involvement came out, Trump immediately said that he would block a deal with Microsoft. Microsoft had to go grovelling to Trump over a weekend to have him say, grudgingly, they could continue to pursue a deal.
Then, of course, there's the Walmart story. Rumors came out that Walmart was a leading bidder, but Trump's White House stepped in and told them they would block that deal too, because it would show that Trump's figleaf "national security" explanation for banning TikTok was an obvious lie.
In other words, throughout this nonsense process, the President -- who at one point also demanded a finder's fee for any deal -- made it clear that this was about his own whims. He was forcing a sale, and he was going to pick a winner -- and the winner had to be someone he liked.
That doesn't seem like the kind of free market people appreciate. It seems like the very worst of a corrupt crony capitalist system.
The WSJ piece details how being corrupt this whole process was. It was all about stroking Trump's ego, and lining his campaign's bank account:
Sequoia Capital used its own connections to push the administration to allow TikTok to continue operating in the U.S., say people familiar with the discussions. Doug Leone, the firm’s global managing partner who took a lead role lobbying on TikTok’s behalf, has donated tens of thousands of dollars to Republican candidates this election season along with his wife, including to the president’s re-election campaign. Mr. Leone also held a reception at his Silicon Valley home for Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in January.
Ms. Catz’s relationship to Mr. Trump could give Oracle a leg up in getting the deal approved, according to people in contact with the White House. Oracle has worked for decades with the U.S. government, including multiple contracts with the national-security establishment.
Once again, this was nothing but performative nonsense from the President that ends in his own supporters lining their pockets. None of it seems to have anything to do with actual national security. It's a joke.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: china, corruption, donald trump, doug leone, grift, larry ellison, safra catz
Companies: bytedance, microsoft, oracle, sequoia, tiktok, walmart
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Is he getting a cut of his grift liked he asked for? Open corruption might as well remain consistant.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
National insecurity
I couldn’t agree more that this has nothing to do with national security but my bigger concern is that issues that actually are important are handled similarly. How many deals of this nature took place with respect to real security issues? I shudder at the thought.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
'Yay for the Dear Leader and the Free Market!'
And of course the best part is that his cultists are certain to be cheering the whole thing on, applauding Trump for sticking it to those filthy 'Others' with nary a thought beyond that lest they wander into heresy territory with their thoughts.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Possibly not directly(though honestly he's so corrupt I wouldn't put it past him), but indirectly I'm sure he will via 'donations' from a very grateful Oracle for the free money he just handed them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: National insecurity
None, because before Trumpkins came along this kind of action was considered the equivalent of a nuclear strike.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: 'Yay for the Dear Leader and the Free Market!'
I used to think Free market was conservative, now hydroxychloroquine is conservative and masks are liberal
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Oracle chairman and present day Mickey Rourke lookalike, Larry Ellison is a Trump Donor, no doubt he'll run a few big money fundraisers to say thanks.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
And whoever follows Trump is now going to have to deal with China forcing American companies to sell their interests their to Chinese companies, all because Donald was humiliated by K-Pop teenagers.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It's just improving on Harry Truman
Truman famously stipulated "The buck stops here" and had a sign with that message on his desk in the Oval Office.
Trump can do better. For him it's "The bucks stop here".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's a joke.
No, it's not. Jokes are funny.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: 'Yay for the Dear Leader and the Free Market!'
Where's the contradiction? Masks stop you from freely trading your virus load. Hydroxychloroquine doesn't.
[ link to this | view in thread ]