Content Moderation Case Study: Facebook Targets Misinformation Spread By The Philippines Government (2020)
from the misinformation-challenges dept
Summary: Philippines president Rodrigo Duterte's rise to power was greatly aided by Facebook and its overwhelming popularity within the country. An estimated 97% of Filipinos have Facebook accounts and the company itself co-sponsored a Q&A session with local journalists that was broadcast on 200 radio and television stations and livestreamed on the platform. Questions were crowdsourced from Facebook users, helping propel the mayor of Davao to the highest office in the country.
Duterte's run for office was also directly assisted by Facebook, which flew a team of reps in to help the candidate's campaign staff maximize the platform's potential. As his campaign gathered critical mass, he and his team began weaponizing the tools handed to him by Facebook, spreading misinformation about other candidates and directly targeting opponents and their supporters with harassment and threats of violence.
Not much has changed since Duterte took office in 2016. Facebook continues to be his preferred social media outlet. But Facebook's latest attempt to tackle the spread of misinformation on its platform may prompt Duterte to find another outlet to weaponize. In September 2020, Facebook's moderation team announced they had removed a "network" linked to the Philippines government for violating its rules against "coordinated inauthentic behavior."
We also removed 64 Facebook accounts, 32 Pages and 33 Instagram accounts for violating our policy against foreign or government interference which is coordinated inauthentic behavior on behalf of a foreign or government entity. This network originated in the Philippines and focused on domestic audiences. (Updated on October 12, 2020 at 6:35PM PT to reflect the latest enforcement numbers.)
Facebook's removal of this content prompted immediate comments from President Duterte. The president's response to Facebook's moderation efforts was a reminder from Duterte that he has the power to shut the platform down in his country if he believes he's being treated unfairly.
“I allow you to operate here,” Mr. Duterte said. “You cannot bar or prevent me from espousing the objectives of government. Is there life after Facebook? I don’t know. But we need to talk.”
Questions and policy implications to consider:
- Does targeting official government accounts increase the risk of the platform being banned or blocked in targeted countries?
- Does the possible loss of market share affect moderation decisions targeting governments?
- Should Facebook be directly involved in setting up social media campaigns for political figures/government entities?
- Does Facebook have any contingency plans in place to mitigate collateral damage to citizens in countries where the platform has been subjected to retaliatory actions by governments whose content/accounts have been removed?
Originally posted to the Trust & Safety Foundation website.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: content moderation, coordinated inauthentic behavior, philippines, rodrigo duterte, trolls
Companies: facebook
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
"Summary: Philippines president Rodrigo Duterte's rise to power was greatly aided by Facebook and its overwhelming popularity within the country. An estimated 97% of Filipinos have Facebook accounts and the company itself co-sponsored a Q&A session with local journalists that was broadcast on 200 radio and television stations and livestreamed on the platform. Questions were crowdsourced from Facebook users, helping propel the mayor of Davao to the highest office in the country. "
Should be a hint that the site isn't exactly as private as people want to make it out to be.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
But in all seriousness, while it's good they're removing troll accounts; I don't think anyone should trust Facebook to the be arbiter of misinformation, either. The fact 97% of the country have a facebook account shows that it's a fixture in their electoral system whether people want to waffle on whether it's a private company that can do whatever it wants or not.
I'm sure this will be the norm in coming elections.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Anyone who trusts a single outlet for news or otherwise is being foolish.
The statistic regarding facebook accounts vs population is not indicative as to whether said accounts use FB exclusively for their news source.
Forcing FB to regulate content IAW your opinions is not going to produce the desired affect(s).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Your point is…what, exactly? Unless Facebook is receiving money from the government of the Philippines to act as an arm of the government, it isn’t a government actor. Wanting the opposite conclusion to be a fact doesn’t make it a fact.
Yes, the societal power wielded by Facebook is at least worrisome. That said: The people who use Facebook for their top (and possibly only) news source have to take responsibility for that choice. Facebook isn’t forcing people to do that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The people saying Facebook is responsible for the Rhogani genocide and that it is worrisome that they can exercise control, would you please make up your minds already!
Is the problem that they exercise too much control or not enough of it? Is the issue that they are stronger than governments or that they cave to authoritarian regimes? There can be fertile debates about which stance is better but only madness results from askinf to do two contradictory actions at once.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
How does this make it not private?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Facebook has grown too big at this point. We need smaller units.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: facbook policy
Are you a GPT2 chatbot? Because that was so incoherent that it caused you to fail a Turing test.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: facbook policy
Yeah. That's a chatbot and a spambot in one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Facebook: FeelsCIAman
[ link to this | view in chronology ]