CBP Facial Recognition Program Has Gathered 50 Million Face Photos, Identified Fewer Than 300 Imposters
from the more-buck-than-bang-at-this-point dept
The CBP and DHS have released their annual report [PDF] covering trade and travel. It touts the agencies' successes in these areas but raises some questions about the use of facial recognition tech to make the nation safer.
Dave Gershgorn, writing for One Zero, points out the system the DHS and CBP claim is essential to national security isn't doing much to secure the nation. And it's not for a lack of input data.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection scanned more than 23 million people with facial recognition technology at airports, seaports, and pedestrian crossings in 2020, the agency recently revealed in its annual report on trade and travel.
The agency scanned four million more people than in 2019. The report indicates that the system caught no imposters traveling through airports last year and fewer than 100 new pedestrian imposters.
There are two ways of looking at this -- neither of which justify the DHS's aggressive expansion of biometric collection at airports, border crossings, and any other place travelers might be found.
This low number of imposters recognized could indicate the system is flawed -- incapable of accurately doing the job it's supposed to do: recognize faces. This is a problem inherent to every facial recognition algorithm being used anywhere. The tech tends to be most accurate when presented with white male faces. Everyone else is subjected to higher risk of being misidentified, which can lead to false arrests or being prevented from traveling.
But it could also indicate imposters aren't all that common -- certainly not common enough to justify the erection of a mass surveillance system that gives travelers the option of giving up their biometric info or not traveling.
The CBP only began tracking and publishing stats in 2018, trailing its biometric rollout by a couple of years. Since 2018, the government has caught less than 300 imposters. Over that same time period, it performed 50 million face scans. That's a pretty terrible return on investment. But that's not how the CBP portrays this in its report:
Biometrics have proven an effective tool to combat the use of stolen and fraudulent travel and identity documents. Since the program’s inception, in 2018, CBP officers at U.S. airports have successfully intercepted seven impostors who were denied admission to the United States and identified 285 imposters on arrival in the land pedestrian environment.
I guess it all depends on what your definition of "effective" is. The CBP's expansive definition suggests literally any number above zero justifies the cost of the tech and its attendant surveillance creep.
Of course, if the real purpose of the program is to create a massive database of facial photos and personal information, it's been a tremendous success. And if that's all the CBP and DHS expect from it, it will continue to perform this task with minimal interruption.
But travelers and taxpayers should expect more from the DHS and its agencies. Spending millions to deal with a minor problem by deploying tech that remains unproven shouldn't be considered acceptable. Neither is the alternative: a system that rarely recognizes imposters, allowing government agencies to assume it's less of a problem than it might actually be.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cbp, dhs, facial recognition, national security, privacy, security theater, surveillance
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Two Possibilities
These are both possible and are the most likely option by far. However, it is also technically possible that imposters have stopped coming because of the technology.
Highly unlike, but a third possibility.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Two Possibilities
Who are these imposters!? I want to talk to them, face to face to face.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Key point
Stated objectives are often wildly different from true objectives. In many cases, particularly when government is involved, they can be diametrically opposed. Just as we should always look at what politicians do rather than what they say, we should also always look closely at what any given program actually accomplishes, versus what we are told the program is supposed to accomplish.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why not
Was there a reason in them being Imposters?
Why they would try to come into the USA?
Any comments on that??
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yes, it was implied, but...
... this article leaves at least one important question not quite addressed:
CPB claims to have identified 300 imposters;
Was the use of computerized facial recognition technology actually the means by which these imposters were identified and caught?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Considering the US' security aptitude lately...
...something tells me this massive facial recognition array is accessible to China, Russia, private black hats and anyone else who wants to find out who cut them off on the freeway.
I wonder if CBP's own employees are in that database.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Facial Recognition alone or ??
I'd like to see the breakdown of how much of the stated successes were only possible to catch via facial recognition alone? How many of them would have been detected at a point where documentation was checked, fingerprints scanned, etc.
I suspect the actual success numbers are probably even lower than what has been stated when the rest of the detection mechanisms are taken into account.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Facial Recognition alone or ??
So, you have the idea that they Dont have a list/computer display that can show every persons Passport with a picture of the persons? form both lands, canada and the USA? or any other combination??
Our gov. is so far behind in tech, its laughable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How does this facial recognition work when everyone is wearing a mask?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"when everyone is wearing a mask"
Less well.
Facial recognition software can still analyze partial faces, such as the eyes. Mask and opaque glasses will hide your face even better, and there are shirts and accessories with patterns that confuse face-finding routines.
Also facial recognition image capture depends sometimes on non-visible light (infrared?) and some hackers have used this as a means to project another face on their own, which fools some facial recognition software.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If CBP has been on the cams all this time and still doesn't know who the imposter is, then CBP is hella sus....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
when will the CBP stop lying to us with BS about impostors and tell the truth as to what the real reason for this civil rights violating software is for! it is not just the CBP that wants the CBP to have this tech, it is the rest of the alphabet mafia insisting they have have it. that way when any of the 3 letter mafia's gets band from using it there will be others to fill the gap!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]