Content Moderation Case Study: Time Warner Cable Doesn't Want Anyone To See Critical Parody (2013)
from the can-we-make-things-worse? dept
Summary: In 2013, two comedians named Jason Selvig and Davram Stiefler, who performed as “The Good Liars,” got some attention for mocking a particular popular target of mockery: poor service from your broadband provider. For Selvig and Stiefler, their target was Time Warner Cable. In late March of that year, they released a video on YouTube in which they pretended to be Time Warner Cable employees interviewing people on the street about how TWC could make its service even worse.
To support the initial viral attention that the video was receiving, the two also set up a series of parody Time Warner Cable “customer support” accounts that would respond -- just like the real TWC customer support Twitter account -- to people complaining about their service, again asking how they could make things worse.
However, just as the video was getting more momentum, the entire YouTube channel set up by Selvig and Stiefler was taken down, as were most of the fake Twitter accounts, even though they were all clearly labeled as parody accounts, and despite policies that said that parody was allowed on these services.
Time Warner Cable, in a statement to the Daily Dot, said that it had no problem with parodies of its service in general, but was opposed to parodies that used the name of its CEO:
“We’re a big company and so we’re not at all opposed to a good parody or satire,” Bobby Amirshahi, a TWC representative, told the Daily Dot. The two crossed the line, he said, by choosing “Glenn Britt,” the company’s CEO, as their username. The issue was “posting as though it was from the CEO, i.e. impersonation,” Amirshahi said. “Otherwise, no action would be taken.”
TWC also convinced GoDaddy to remove the website that Selvig and Stiefler had used as a central hub for all of its TWC mockery, twcustomerservice.com.
Decisions to be made by YouTube/Twitter/GoDaddy:
- Where do you draw the line regarding what is acceptable parody and unacceptable impersonation?
- Is the use of TWC’s CEO enough to make it no longer acceptable?
- Should there be different rules when the parody is about a large company rather than an individual?
- Parody and satire are often important ways to speak out against the powerful. Will clamping down on parodies in this manner suppress commentary and criticism?
- Can rules against impersonation allow powerful individuals and companies to silence criticism?
Time Warner Cable itself no longer exists. Charter Communications bought Time Warner Cable in 2016 and has rebranded most former Time Warner Cable services under its “Spectrum” brand name.
Originally posted to the Trust & Safety Foundation website.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: parody, satire, the good liars
Companies: time warner cable, twitter
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
And the surest way to keep a lid on it is to ban it!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is this a nonprofit academic "institute" or just a name?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How many donors to this "institute" have been covered on the pages of Techdirt?
Are its financial statements available?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Nice try, John Smith.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Why are you people so bad at this?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If you really wanted to know, rather than insinuating something shady is goimg on, you would have used the search Techdirt box and answered your own question.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I guess they should change the name to Glenn Brittle.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
'We're huge fans of parody... unless it's parody of us.'
Nothing confirms how supportive you are of parody by squashing any parody of you.
At the same time I suppose I can see why Time Warner might have freaked out, I mean even with the parody tag with treatment like that I imagine it would still be entirely reasonable for customers to think it was the real thing and TW had just stopped pretending that they actually gave a damn about their customers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 'We're huge fans of parody... unless it's parody of us.'
On the other hand; I'm at least somewhat technically and social media literate, and the above twitter post (until you start to read the text) does look like its coming from TWC.They could "break the illusion" with, for example, a parody revealing @name, and still maintain all of the satire potential, at least in my book, without potentially confusing anyone (which is the main protection trademark is supposed to grant).
TWC's has declared their line in the sand (truthful or not), is CEO impersonation (weather or not that's a good line, they're reaction is way over the top for that, I think, just flag the CEO "impersonating" content).
I'm not sure I'm on board with their line in the sand, but on face value, they have one that is not entirely unreasonable; just fake it with a message from "Glen Greedy, Chief Screwing-over-customers Officer" or something.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is legit in today's world of gullible users
I can understand TW's position. People are morons and more than a handful probably thought they were genuinely interacting with someone at TW.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This is legit in today's world of gullible users
Well, when Poe's Law is in effect...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: This is legit in today's world of gullible users
"Well, when Poe's Law is in effect..."
When Powell's Law [1] is in effect..
FTFY
[1] "No reasonable person would believe......" - Sidney Powell
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Twitter allows parody...unless a big corporation complains about it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Case study
This is a good post. A case study helps in the growth of knowledge. I am trying to solve unilever case study. I got this case study solution https://www.caseprofessors.com/unilever-1203.html here
[ link to this | view in chronology ]