Consumer Groups Get Punchy As Biden Team Lags On Staffing FCC, Restoring Net Neutrality
from the taking-your-sweet-time dept
Last December the Trump administration rushed the appointment of Nathan Simington to the FCC, despite Simington having absolutely no real experience or qualifications for the role. That's because Simington was appointed for two other reasons. One being the silly (and utterly hypocritical if you tracked the net neutrality fights) effort by the Trump administration to try and have the FCC target Section 230, which was derailed by Trump's election loss.
But the other purpose of Simington's rush appointment was to ensure the FCC would be gridlocked at 2-2 commissioners. Like the FTC, the FCC is comprised of a 3-2 partisan makeup depending on who controls the White House. And while Biden could have easily appointed a new FCC Commissioner to break that gridlock, we're now nearing six months into his tenure with no movement on this front.
Granted there are a lot of fires the Biden administration is tasked with putting out. But having a gridlocked FCC during a health and economic crisis where broadband is playing a starring role still isn't a great look. As a result, a coalition of more than 50 consumer groups and unions wrote the Biden camp last week asking for something vaguely resembling urgency on the FCC front:
"As we move toward the second half of 2021 with no nomination for the fifth and final commissioner, the Federal Communications Commission remains below full capacity, which is incompatible with the goal of delivering open, affordable and reliable high-speed broadband to every home. This is all the more urgent given the fact poor families and people of color are disproportionately disconnected from high-speed internet access, compounding grave inequalities that were made worse during the pandemic.
Given the legislative calendar and the diminishing number of days for hearings and confirmation votes, we have reached a critical point to guarantee the agency charged with ensuring affordable communications access can do its work during your administration. Failing to nominate a fifth commissioner leaves the FCC less than fully operational and limits its capacity to most effectively.
Consumer groups are being overly polite here because they tactically need to be, but there's no reason for this to be taking this long, even with everything on the Biden team's plate.
I bring this up a lot, but that's because I still see a lot of folks who seem to think the net neutrality repeal didn't really matter much because the internet didn't immediately implode in a rainbow of color.
But it mattered because the repeal didn't just kill net neutrality rules, it effectively gutted the FCC's consumer protection authority, leaving it ill-equipped to police basic things like rampant telecom industry billing fraud. It shoveled any remaining consumer protection oversight to an FTC with limited authority over telecom, and that's too understaffed and underfunded to tack "hold telecom monopolies meaningfully accountable" on top of its existing, massive workload. It's precisely why the telecom lobby pushed for this. And the Biden team's lack in doing anything on this front for five+ months reflects a failure to understand any of this.
This regulatory lobotomization also occurred right before a crisis showcasing the essential nature of broadband for stuff like education, healthcare, and overall opportunity. The ridiculously named Trump/Pai "restoring internet freedom" repeal even tried to ban states from protecting broadband consumers (though the courts haven't looked too kindly on this last part). Needles to say, the combination of limited competition and regulatory capture isn't a good thing, and if you think it is, you've not spent much time on the phone with Comcast support, or trying to use an aging, expensive DSL line.
All of this also still matters because all of the justifications for the repeal, including claims of amazing job growth and ramped up broadband network investment, wound up being a lie. We effectively gutted oversight of a broken and heavily monopolized US business sector -- entirely because a handful of monopolies and their various policy tendrils promised all manner of amazing outcomes. When a long parade of experts pointed out the repeal was based on bullshit and would be harmful, we... ignored them. And when the amazing promised outcomes never materialized... we ignored that too.
And while many insist that Congress should just pass a net neutrality law and end this "regulatory ping pong," that (usually intentionally) ignores the fact that this telecom campaign-cash slathered Congress is never going to hit the 60 votes necessary to pass a law of any worth. That leaves us with a choice: either an FCC that's too feckless and pathetic to be able to stand up to AT&T and Comcast, or an FCC that at least has the authority and voting majority to occasionally hold these giants accountable.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: biden administration, fcc, gridlock
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Long standing problem.
In the 70's
Our congress promoted the idea that they could work better if they WERE PAID.
They voted their own wages.
Just for fun, HOW much are all these people making? Congress makes about $180k per person.
How about the rest of the agencies?
WHO thinks we can Hire people to do the job, ALOT CHEAPER?
And get better outcomes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Long standing problem.
The people being hired to do Congress' job are called lobbyists. Still think that's a good idea?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Long standing problem.
yes.
When the rep job was to pay only for travel and Living in DC. You had allot more people doing it for the Honor, NOT the money.
Then if there are others getting more money then the congress, I would suggest we find someone BETTER.
Its going to happen, anyway. As we cut the budget, and the poor have more more money, it has to take from those with TO MUCH.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Long standing problem.
That is the most delusional thing I've heard in a long time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You missed one that is becoming increasingly apparent and important:
Now that ISPs aren't protected by Title II, media conglomorates are coming out of the woodwork to sue them for their customer's alleged piracy.
That is, the ISPs that aren't already megamerged with a media conglomorate are being sued for their customer's alleged piracy.
So it's not just citizens who are being harmed by the FCC's inability to function as a watchdog; ISPs are as well. It's become a case of "buy a media portfolio or be unable to compete as an ISP due to the (sometimes won) lawsuits." That's really really messed up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
like has been said, Biden is sitting back, doing nothing, and it can only be so as to not upset the big boys, A,T&T and Comcast or the corrupt members in Congress who think more of lining their own pockets than doing what is expected of them by the voters. Biden put the cat among the pigeons when he announced the new initative for broadband deployment. he daren't have another go at those concerned. trouble is, the only ones who lose are the public and the only ones who win are the big ISPs and Telecom plus the corrupt politicians. all that will happen is what has happened before, the money will be taken, the word will be 'yes, of course we will' the result will be fuck all, again, just like before! the worst thing is, these big names know that nothing will ever be done to them so the yjust carry on take, take, take and getting away with it. if sensible fines and jail time were real probabilities, maybe, just maybe, they'd thing harder before stealing the millions in public funding, just like in the past!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]