Superior Court Dumps BS Charges Brought Against New Jersey Homeowner For Her 'Fuck Biden' Signs
from the if-not-superior,-at-least-an-improvement-over-the-last-court dept
Last week, a New Jersey municipal court judge sided with the town of Roselle Park, New Jersey, and its decision to fine a homeowner for "obscene" signs she had in her yard. The signs weren't obscene in any legal sense of the word -- not even under the ordinance the town claimed she had violated. When the homeowner refused to back down, the town started finding her $250/day.
The homeowner, Patricia Dilascio, tried to fight back, challenging the citation in municipal court. Unfortunately for her, the presiding judge misread the law and completely ignored the First Amendment to back the town government and its inexplicable decision to prosecute a handful of "Fuck Biden" signs. According to the town's mayor, "there's no place for profanity by a school and school children" -- a statement that can only be made by someone who's never overhead the things said by school kids when they think no adults are listening.
The judge, however, should have been able to read the law and follow a whole bunch of precedent from the nation's top court -- precedent that says the First Amendment firmly protects political speech, even when it includes the word "fuck." In the view of this court, a balance needed to be struck between protecting free speech and sparing hypothetical parents from having to explain the f-word to their hypothetical children.
With everyone with any power being stupid about this, the ACLU stepped in to take the case. And that seems to have prompted immediate results.
The Superior Court, Law Division today vacated charges against a Roselle Park resident, represented by the ACLU-NJ, who was cited for violating the town’s obscenity ordinance after displaying signs that read “Fuck Biden” on her property.
The Superior Court, unfortunately, did not serve up an opinion strongly protecting free speech rights or excoriating the judge who had mishandled the original charges. But it did move fast once the town dismissed the ticket and agreed not to try to collect any fines.
This likely wouldn't have happened without the ACLU stepping in to help even out the balance of power. When it was just a town beating up on a resident for political speech, the mayor, Joseph Signorello, could not have been more sure of his rightness, calling the judge's blown call a "win for decency." But with the case gaining national attention -- and not a single person who knows anything about the First Amendment willing to side with him -- the only way to slow the bleeding was to abandon ship before it became the foundation for a civil rights lawsuit the town was certain to lose.
But even after agreeing to drop the charges, the mayor seems compelled to have the last word. And it's just as moronic as his opening salvo.
The mayor, Joseph Signorello III, called it a “moral loss” for the borough.
“Those signs are offensive, and were I a neighbor, I would be offended,” said Mr. Signorello, a Democrat.
“You cannot legislate decency,” he added, “and I think that’s a sad reality.”
Ohhhh… but you thought you could! I mean, that was the point of this misuse and apparently deliberate misreading of the town's obscenity statute. And somehow your town was blessed with the assistance of a judge just as concerned about children and just as dismissive of civil liberties as you are! Sure, it's too bad you're both wrong, but you guys had a thing going for a bit. Try to enjoy your memories of the calm before the shitstorm, when everything was full of promise and possibilities.
Nice, isn't it?
Well… knock it off. Those days are over. Stop living in the past. Welcome back to America, where criticism of government officials is pretty much the poster boy for the First Amendment. There are better things to do with your town's time and money than waste it on protecting hypothetical children from the nonexistent threat of posted profanities.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: 1st amendment, free speech, new jersey, patricia dilascio, political speech, roselle park, yard signs
Companies: aclu
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Mayor (probably): Fuck the First Amendment
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The First Amendment: Fuck you right back, dickcheese.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"When the homeowner refused to back down, the town started finding her $250/day."
Well by golly, sign me up too!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
"...the town started finding her $250/day."
Would that make her a sex worker?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
An excellent example of the American legal system.
A wealthy party successfully forces a poorer party to throw away money defending themselves from specious charges, only backing off when confronted by an even wealthier party. The "winner" is out a few thousand dollars, the "loser" is out nothing (as their lawyer is on retainer regardless), and no precedent is set, allowing the "loser" to continue pursuing victims who don't have disposable income or can't get their cases picked up by national media.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Well she said, "F*(# Biden" Maybe she just digs old people.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
You misspelled 'good and reassuring' there mayor
“You cannot legislate decency,” he added, “and I think that’s a sad reality.”
Yes, curse that first amendment and the fact that it's difficult to force people to live according to your view of 'decency', if only there was an extensive history of why that's a good thing.
Good to see this one get thrown into the garbage as it deserved, it'd be nice if those that engaged in this trampling of the first amendment learned from their loss so they'd be less likely to do it again but it sounds like the mayor at least only regrets that they didn't get to force their idea of 'decency' on others.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
“It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so fucking what."
[I saw hate in a graveyard -- Stephen Fry, The Guardian, 5 June 2005]”
[ link to this | view in thread ]
wonder how many people are standing outside city hall with a sign that read's "FUCK THE MAYOR"?
easy money....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
It's even more common for other people to project "being offended" onto groups with legit grievances, as if "being offended" were the extent of the problem.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Laws in this country legislate "decency" every day. FOSTA anyone?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Sorry skippy your morals aren't the basis for the law.
I'm really offended you tried to silence someone you disagreed with by ignoring the bedrock the nations was founded upon... but I guess your morals trump that too you fscking asswipe.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: there was no backing off
There was no backing off here.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The law should not be have been written.
In light of Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971), how could anyone consider this a law that does not violate the 1st amendment through the 14th amendment?
How could the magistrate be so stupid? And don't take this question as a challenge on being more stupid.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The Mayor
10 bucks says he still gets re-elected!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Shit. I know shit's bad right now, with all that starving bullshit, and the dust storms, and we are running out of french fries and burrito coverings. But I got a solution.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Well Now
Perhaps she was just lustfully horny.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: You misspelled 'good and reassuring' there mayor
Um . . . Mr. Mayor? Decency is good and all, but that just isn't your job.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
I'm calling it. This is going to inspire real-person fan fiction.
[ link to this | view in thread ]