Arlo Makes Live Customer Service A Luxury Option
from the basic-competency-is-extra dept
The never-ending quest for improved quarterly returns means that things that technically shouldn't be luxury options, inevitably wind up being precisely that. We've shown how a baseline expectation of privacy is increasingly treated as a luxury option by hardware makers and telecoms alike. The same thing also sometimes happens to customer service; at least when companies think they can get away with it.
"Smart home" and home security hardware vendor Arlo, for example, has announced a number of new, not particularly impressive subscription tiers for its internet-connected video cameras. The changes effectively involve forcing users to pay more money every month if they ever want to talk to a live customer service representative. From Stacey Higginbotham:
"This week, Arlo launched what I generously think of as its pay-for-customer-service enticement for its smart home camera products. As of Oct. 4, customers without a subscription who’ve had their devices for more than 90 days no longer get phone support. And after one year, they lose access to live chat support."
If you don't pay Arlo more money for actual customer service, you're relegated to cobbling together support solutions from the company's forums, an automated website chat bot, or elsewhere. Given the cost of Arlo products, the decision to make speaking to an actual human being a $3 to $15 monthly add on is fairly ludicrous:
"Arlo’s customer support framework now requires a $2.99 to $14.99 per month Arlo subscription, a free trial plan, or the device to be within 90 days of purchase for phone support. Then you’re downgraded to chat support for the remainder of the year.
After that, absent a plan, Arlo customers with problems will only have access to a virtual assistant or the public forums. That means no phone support and no chat. This feels pretty punitive for a product that can cost between $130 and $300 depending on the device."
Even U.S. telecom giants, the poster children for atrocious U.S. customer service, haven't meaningfully pursued making live customer support a premium option (though they have tinkered with innately providing worse support to folks with low credit scores). Arlo's choice comes amidst higher shipping costs and supply chain issues during COVID, but the decision to try and recover those higher costs by making basic competency a luxury tier will likely come back to bite it in an IOT space that's only getting more competitive.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: customer support, home security, iot, subscription fees
Companies: arlo
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
If the chat bot can't Fix it, RMA it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Customer Service
[ link to this | view in thread ]
unreal
MOST companies, especially ones that provide services like Uber don't even have an easy way to email them.
How is it that ANY COMPANy these days validates accounts without an email validation? I have people signing me up for stuff all the time and the company doesn't validate the account...then I need to navigate their annoying customer service THAT ASSUMES YOU'RE A CUSTOMER.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"If you don't pay Arlo more money for actual customer service, you're relegated to cobbling together support solutions..."
As a current Arlo customer (cameras and subscription), I can confidently say that paying or not, the term "actual customer service" is very generous. That said, at least as far as I know, they don't share my video recordings with the local constabulary.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Someone might not have read all the words in the TOS and clickwrap...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Sure hope they disclose this in the advertising and packaging.
Pretty sure there are laywers just chomping at the bit to file a class action about bait and switch tactics trying to lock customers into a monthly bill they know nothing about until they open the box.
Imma just wait till they end up hacked...
what? its a IoT company... the odds are forever in my favor.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
And if you can’t RMA without paying a fee, well, that’s what credit card chargebacks are for.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
need support? thats DLC
kinda funny because many times a customer might find bugs and/or security flaws and has no way to troubleshoot due to not having the support dlc
really hope this backfires badly on them, heh customer buy product, cant set it up, needs tech support but thats a paid dlc, customer returns it to the store and buys some other brand instead lol
i love companies that have chat, its way faster to chat with a person than call or email them
[ link to this | view in thread ]