Telecom Monopolies Are Exploiting Crappy U.S. Broadband Maps To Block Community Broadband Grant Requests

from the do-not-pass-go,-do-not-collect-$200 dept

We've noted repeatedly that despite a lot of breathless rhetoric about America's "quest to bridge the digital divide," U.S. government leaders still don't actually know where broadband is or isn't available. Shoddy broadband mapping has generally been a good thing for regional U.S. telecom monopolies, who not only have been allowed to obscure competition gaps (and the high prices and poor service that result), but hoover up an endless gravy train of subsidies and tax breaks for networks that...mysteriously...always wind up half deployed. Our failure to measure deployment success has been painfully, repeatedly exploited.

But there are other ways that incumbents exploit our ongoing failure to map broadband to their advantage. Case in point: roughly 230 U.S. communities have applied for broadband grants being doled out as part of the National Transportation Infrastructure Agency (NTIA)'s $288 million Broadband Infrastructure Program. But when a town or local cooperative/utility/public-private partnership looking to build its own, better broadband network applies for the grant, they're facing baseless challenges by ISPs which claim they already serve these areas.

Grafton, New Hampshire, for example, is looking to build its own fiber network after years of market neglect. It had 3,000 of the 4,000 census blocks they applied for grant money for falsely challenged by regional giants Comcast and Charter Spectrum:

"Of the 4,000 census blocks covered by Grafton’s grant application, Coates said that incumbent ISPs challenged 3,000 of them, even those dominated by cemeteries. In the majority of the challenges, telecom giants overstated available speeds and existing coverage, he noted. “My immediate response was that this was them telling us to go boil water,” Coates said. “Here you go, prove that you can do this in these three thousand census blocks. Have fun figuring it out.”

As we've noted, there's a big lobbying push afoot by entrenched monopolies to ensure as little government stimulus money as possible goes toward building out competition to their regional dominance, no matter what that competition looks like (cooperatives, utilities, local governments, smaller private ISPs, private/public partnerships). To justify their obstruction to local community grants, big ISPs like Comcast and Charter point to FCC broadband maps they know aren't accurate to insist nothing needs to be done. That perpetuates the sub-par service and high prices created by monopolization.

Except the FCC's maps routinely overstate both coverage and speeds, and have for decades. The FCC's methodology also declared (until only recently) that an entire census block is "served" with broadband, if an ISP claims it can serve just one home in that census block. While there have finally been some meaningful improvements to FCC mapping pushed through Congress, it's still going to be several years (and significantly more funding) before most of those fixes can be properly implemented. Some states have developed their own alternative mapping solutions, but for many, engaging in a bureaucratic battle with deep-pocketed monopolies to disprove their coverage claims isn't financially viable.

While the NTIA has made some progress of its own on mapping, it's still being tasked with doling out $42 billion in additional broadband grants as part of the recently passed infrastructure bill -- despite still not having an entirely accurate picture of the problem it's trying to fix. That is, and will continue to be, exploited by entrenched monopolies like AT&T, Comcast, Charter, or Verizon which have not only fought against better mapping for years (knowing more accurate data would only spur calls for reform), but have a vested interest in fighting tooth and nail against any effort to disrupt the uncompetitive status quo.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: broadband, broadband maps, community broadband, digital divide, fcc, grants, ntia, telecom


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Jan 2022 @ 6:24am

    this is stated here and elsewhere time after time after time but nothing is ever done to stop the monopolies from continuing with the exploitation and nothing is ever done to stop the corrupt politicians from allowing/helping those monopolies to continue happening! no matter how many times it is reported, until something is actually done to stop the political corruption which not only helps but also throws money at them like a man with no arms, you might just as well keep quiet!! perhaps that's what the hope but the exposure isn't working, the 'naming and shaming' isn't working, the suggestion of voting someone else into office isn't working, so what's the next? the USA is as big a corrupt nation as any on the planet, but the first to condemn other countries for doing what it does. how the hell can any type of good example be sent when we set one at home like this?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Dave, 3 Jan 2022 @ 3:24pm

      Re:

      nothing is ever done to stop the monopolies from continuing with the exploitation

      People tried. The monopolies ruthlessly exterminated their efforts.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Jan 2022 @ 6:39am

    I wish Politico or another news outlet would take the last 20 years of subsidies and map exactly what has been deployed where for how much money, and the promises vs the reality. Make a great infographic and show that Verizon, Comcast, and Charter has bilked billions out of the government and done about 10% of their promised work. Be hard to use the 'but municipal broadband is a money pit that never works and costs a fortune' when they show that their success rates are even more abhorrent than the boogeyman they have created to demonize their competition.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    That One Guy (profile), 3 Jan 2022 @ 6:41am

    'That's bad for our bottom line so no, no money for you.'

    Throwing money at the problem of lousy(or non-existent) internet access without admitting to and addressing the reason why it's in that state is like applying a fresh coat of paint to a dam that's bursting at the seams. Sure it looks like you're Doing Something and the resulting mess will look slightly better but you're not actually doing anything about the real problem.

    On a more specific note bloody hell talk about a conflict of interest allowing the major ISP's to challenge grant requests like this, why would they ever not challenge a request if they thought they could get away with it since the result is them getting more money and less competition?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 3 Jan 2022 @ 6:53am

      Re: 'That's bad for our bottom line so no, no money for you.'

      There should be an Anti-SLAPP style rule for when companies intentionally try and slow down the progress of another through litigation. Fee-shifting plus VERY PUNISHING fines for delaying the other company's time to market.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 3 Jan 2022 @ 6:55am

        Re: Re: 'That's bad for our bottom line so no, no money for you.

        Strategic Lawsuits Against Corporate Competition -- Anti-SLACC

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 Jan 2022 @ 5:52am

    Danes and their geld

    It's been known for a long, long, time that if you pay people to stop misbehaving, they will continue misbehaving to extort more money, while claiming to do as they promised...

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.