Hypocrisy Rules As Companies Try To Smear New FTC Nomination Alvaro Bedoya
from the rat-fucking-du-jour dept
Throughout the Trump administration, a lot of folks had absolutely no problem with the mindless rubber-stamps appointed to key regulatory positions. Ajit Pai, for example, couldn't have demonstrated regulatory capture any more clearly, rubber-stamping every idiotic whim of telecom monopolies at every conceivable opportunity (often with the help of fabricated data and fraud). Revolving door regulation and unqualified industry lackey appointments hit a fevered pitch not seen at any point in U.S. history, and at every step a long list of organizations and individuals made it abundantly clear they were fine with all of it.
Fast forward to Biden's efforts to replace some of these folks, and a lot of these same organizations and individuals that turned a blind eye to the worst aspects of Trumpism are now fanning their face about perceived conflicts of interest, "partisan politics," and all manner of hypocritical injustices.
See the intentionally gridlocked nomination of new FCC Commissioner Gigi Sohn, for example. Sohn is popular across both sides of the aisle and, whatever you think of her positions and politics, highly competent. Yet her nomination has been stuck in congressional purgatory for months thanks to completely false claims ranging from she wants to "censor conservatives," to laughable claims from revolving door cable lobbyists that her history as an expert on consumer advocacy means she can't regulate telecom fairly. All coming from industry folks who don't actually believe anything they're saying.
The same gamesmanship is also imperiling the nomination of Alvaro Bedoya to the FTC. Bedoya is a professor and founding Director of Georgetown Law’s Center on Privacy & Technology and is widely respected. Whatever one thinks of Bedoya's politics and positions, there's no real doubt that he's competent and qualified for the role. But companies that don't really want competent, objective regulators have been working overtime to smear Bedoya in the same way they're working to smear Sohn. Usually through proxy groups and think tanks they funnel money, and then flimsy arguments, to.
For example the "American Consumer Institute Center for Citizen Research" is not really a consumer group. It's one of countless 501(c)(3) nonprofits corporations covertly fund, and use to create the illusion of broad support (or opposition) for/to things big companies want. For example the American Consumer Institute was paid by telecom to scuttle FCC oversight of telecom monopolies, yet pretended to just be an objective organization giving an honest, objective opinion.
The group is also popping up in the attacks against Bedoya, attempting to frame him as some kind of radical. Usually, because he's (gasp) levied accurate criticisms at the actually radical modern Trump GOP:
"If confirmed, Bedoya would bring a record of hyper-partisan, extremist advocacy to the FTC and would steer the agency in a direction of over-reaching and harmful regulatory policies....He has amplified Twitter posts calling Governors Abbott and DeSantis “death-eaters”and urging Republican Senators to resign. Additionally, Bedoya has shared numerous social media posts calling President Trump and individuals in the Trump administration “racist and white supremacist."
Believing that Donald Trump is racist and terrible is not a disqualifying character flaw. And, of course, groups like the American Consumer Institute don't really care about "hyper-partisanship," "extreme advocacy," or anybody being called out for racism. They're trying to squash Bedoya's nomination because the companies they're aligned with don't want the FTC or FCC ramping up consumer protection and antitrust reform. If they can't scuttle the nominations, they hope to delay both the FCC and FTC from having working voting majorities for as long as possible.
It's not serious policy opinion, it's the kind of bad faith, theatrical proxy, rat fuckery that's been the norm in DC for more than 20 years. Despite this, the press still can't really help itself and will also quote and amplify groups like this as if they're actually objective, well-intentioned observers, and not, say, rat fucking propagandists for hire.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: alvaro bedoya, ftc, nominations
Companies: american consumer institute
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
So every moron who signed onto the GOP claim that it wasn't an insurrection will take their hyper-partisan asses off of committees?
We've heard them clutching pearls about tweets that might not be polite, while they are still supporting the insurrectionist in chief who took political discourse back to the school yard level of name calling and whining.
Start wearing patches to show us who bought you & stop pretending anything you do is to actually benefit citizens.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Being competent, or mildly reacting to extremists is now hyper-partisan. Good to know. i'm so glad one can frame anything in as batshit-crazy a way as one wants, and then impute whomever else to be the radical crazypants.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
'You can't nominate them, they might do the job!'
As with Sohn, now with Bedoya: The greatest sign that a person is qualified for the job is when the corrupt come pouring out of the woodworks to try to keep them from it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Wishful thinking much?
It should be the norm but clearly isn't. If it were, the current political landscape would not be the clusterfuck it is.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The reasons she should be nominated keep piling up.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
'He' in this case as it's a different person, but yes the same logic applies, if terrible people/groups don't want you to have a job that's a good indicator that you should have it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Yes, our Press
And the press will report the story as:
"Joe Biden agenda flailing as his partisan nominees draw fire from many critics"
I don't see how he recovers from this.
Next up, sports and weather!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Banana Republic, anyone?
This is the way the world ends,
this is the way the world ends,
this is the way the world ends,
Not with a bang but with a whimper
I knew TS Eliot had to be good for something.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Wha the hell? I stumbled across this place looking at completely empty brains making absolutely no sense, congratulations I do think you deserve the cupcake. You are either completely way out smarter than anyone else on this planet or perhaps above the limit of human intelligence.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Sir, this is an Arbys
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Yes, our Press
Well, the reason Biden won the primaries (and why he made it against Trump) is that the "radical leftist Biden" propaganda beggars too much belief to tilt the scale all too much. Of course the U.S. has no "radical left" anywhere in sight near the levers of power anyway, but this whole sad spectacle is more a matter of how well the smear will stick if you say it disdainfully enough. And it looks comparatively ridiculous on Biden.
Of course, if you actually want to plan for the needs of a rapidly changing world and society, banking on near-dead "proven" horses for pulling the cart is not going to get anywhere close to leading the race. The utterly hopelessness of getting the U.S. governed in terms of progressive philosophies (that is, what might have counted as progressive a hundred years or more ago already) because of its stuck-in-the-mire political education, posturing, and system, is a bit sad, considering how it started out.
It's particularly sad for the Republican Party, a determinedly progressive breakout from the Whig Party, with the major divergence being its fight for abolition of slavery, one of Lincoln's major causes.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Go to bed, Donald.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Your extensive and well thought out comment and rebuttal of the article have been noted, thank you for furthering the conversation in a valuable and meaningful manner.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Can I get a cupcake too? That sounds good.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Jealous much?
[ link to this | view in thread ]