If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Trump's Truth Social Bakes Section 230 Directly Into Its Terms, So Apparently Trump Now Likes Section 230
- Wireless Industry Now Claims 5G Will Miraculously Help Fix Climate Change
- New Bill Claims To Ban 'Surveillance Advertising,' But Doesn't Actually Do It
- Airline CEOs Freak Out Over 5G Despite Limited Evidence Of Real World Harm
- Senator Blumenthal Blames TikTok... Due To A Popular And Widely Championed Science Experiment Gone Wrong
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Tough case...
On the other hand, the damage was fairly small, since he put the site up again after he found out what the facts of the matter were, and his client wasn't too upset about it. Though, if his client had been a touchy political organization, there would have been all hell to pay, and he would definately have been out one client, and maybe out of business.
I agree that the overall villian was definately the FBI. That they're doing this kind of shit with seeming impunity is absolutely chilling. I'd like to see the press pick this one up and send it to the masses. I mean, what if a publisher decided not to publish say THE SATANIC VERSES because an FBI agant lied to them and told them their corporation's board of trustees had already voted against it? It would be a headline event. I definately want to find out the name of the FBI agent(s) who did this, and frankly I want to read about pink slips.
Jon
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Tough case...
I am a web host provider and I will pull out any site and or content hosted at my servers if the FBI requests it with or without any search warrant; its even on my TOS...
[ link to this | view in thread ]