from the fascinating dept
We've
already mentioned how a number of comments have been submitted concerning Australian Attorney General George Brandis'
Hollywood wishlist proposal for copyright reform in Australia. There are a number of interesting comments worth reading. I was pleasantly surprised to see the normally copyright-maximalist BSA come out
against the proposal, saying that it will create a real risk of "over-enforcement, punishment of lawful conduct and blocking of lawful content including critically important free speech rights." Dr. Rebecca Giblin, who has studied these issues and other attempts to put in place similar filters (and how they've failed), has also put forth a
very interesting comment.
The most bizarre comment, however,
has to come from Village Roadshow. Village Roadshow is the Australian movie studio that the US State Department admitted was used as
the token "Australian" movie studio in the MPAA's big lawsuit against iiNet. iiNet is the Australian ISP that the MPAA (with Village Roadshow appearing as "the local face") sued for not waving a magic wand and stopping piracy. iiNet
won its case at basically every stage of the game, and that big legal win is really at the heart of these new regulatory proposals. Apparently, Village Roadshow's CEO still hasn't gotten over the loss in the legal case.
I read a lot of public comments to government requests. Comments from individuals may vary in style and quality, but generally speaking, comments from large businesses and professional organizations take on a certain very professional tone. You can see that in basically every comment listed in this particular comment period. Except for Village Roadshow's. The tone is both exceptionally informal and... almost frantic. The use of hyperbole is quite incredible. It claims without these reforms the entire industry will die, and says that infringement is on par with terrorism and pedophilia. Just the intro itself basically highlights the style and tone:
Piracy, if not addressed, will shut down the Australian feature film production industry
entirely. It will rip out the heart of the cinema and TV industries, creating massive
unemployment and slashing the profitability of taxpaying companies.
The problem is urgent. Village Roadshow estimates the theatrical business is down 12% as
a result of piracy. Rupert Murdoch interviewed in Australia said: “between 15 and 20 percent
of Fox’s revenue is being eaten up by illegal downloads”!
The problem is urgent as piracy is spreading like a highly infectious disease and as bad
habits become entrenched, they become harder to eradicate. Also of course high speed
broadband is just around the corner.
The dangers posed by piracy are so great, the goal should be total eradication or zero
tolerance. Just as there is no place on the internet for terrorism or paedophilia, there should
be no place for theft that will impact the livelihoods of the 900,000 people whose security is
protected by legitimate copyright.
And this is from the company whose CEO is refusing to take part in a public Q&A about the issue because he claims that any such event will be
"filled with crazies."
The filing also quotes Steve Jobs from Walter Isaacson's book:
“From the earliest days at Apple, I realised that we thrived
when we created intellectual property. If people copied or stole
our software we’d be out of business. If we weren’t protected
there’d be no incentive for us to make new software or product
designs. If protection of intellectual property begins to
dissipate, creative companies will disappear or never get
started. But there’s a simpler reason. It’s wrong to steal. It
hurts other people. And it hurts your own character.”
Of course, there's that other famous Steve Jobs quote that is a bit more accurate:
"Picasso had a saying -- 'good artists copy; great artists steal' -- and we've always been shameless about stealing great ideas."
And, at least for that quote, we've actually
got video of him saying it rather than having it paraphrased through a third party.
Village Roadshow's filing actually claims that Brandis' proposal does not go far enough in making ISPs liable and forcing them to magically make piracy disappear:
Vitally, in Village’s view, the question of “reasonable steps” presupposes the clear
establishment of ISP’s being potentially liable for infringement on their services. It is crucial
that this first step be properly legislated – and then ISP’s will approach the consultation
process with a legal incentive to co-operate. As the Discussion Paper states “Extending the
authorisation liability is essential ….”. Village is concerned that the proposed amendment to
Section 101 of the Copyright Act suggested in the Discussion Paper does not clearly achieve
this, and supports clear drafting to achieve that objective.
The underlines are in the original. Village Roadshow says that it would love to be able to bombard ISPs with notices in a graduated response (i.e., three strikes type) system, but that it will refuse to do so if it actually has to
pay for each notice (apparently Village Roadshow not only wants ISPs to be the copyright cops, but it wants them to do so for free).
The entire comment filing comes off as ill-thought-out ranting, or last minute answers to a take home exam of a procrastinating junior high school student. Perhaps my favorite example of this is in response to the question "How can the impact of any measures to address online copyright infringement best be measured?" and Village Roadshow starts off its response:
Powerfully this will be measured by the results.
Powerfully, this comment is not.
Filed Under: australia, comments, copyright, george brandis, graham burke
Companies: village roadshow