Aussie Teenager Fearful For His Life After Newspaper Misidentifies Him As A Terrorist With Wrong Facebook Photo

from the like? dept

Thu, Sep 25th 2014 1:26pm — Timothy Geigner

Traditional newspapers: they're the best. In stark contrast with so-called "new media" on the internet, they're the professionals. They write the important stories, give us unbiased reports on all the things, and, most importantly, they have a monopoly on fact-checking. Except, of course, when they don't. Take the case of one young Australian, Abu Bakar Alam, who was incorrectly identified on the front page of The Age in the land down under as a terrorist.

Abu Bakar Alam, 19, said he was afraid to leave his home and was “not really OK” after being wrongly pictured on the front pages of The Age and Sydney Morning Herald in their coverage of the Endeavour Hills police shooting... Mr Alam said the family saw his son’s picture on social media labelled by the newspaper as Numan Haider, the terror suspect, 18, shot dead by police after stabbing two officers on Tuesday.

“Someone called me and said ‘What happened to your son?’ I said, ‘My son is alive, who said my son is a terrorist?’” Mr Alam said.

The mistake, which the paper has since publicly apologized for, was apparently an instance of editors pulling down Facebook photos and getting them confused. Because, pshh, all them brown-skinned folks look alike, am I right? Well, no, I'm not right, and an industry that touts itself as the fact-checking gurus of the world probably needs to do better than simply apologizing for misidentifying a young man as a terrorist. There are, after all, larger implications of such a mistake.

“I’m gutted,” the teenager told 3AW. “This is going to take a while, but we’re going to sit down as a family and work out what’s going to be the best for us. And for my future. This is not something small. This is going to affect my future as well.”

You'd hope that isn't the case, of course, but I'm not sure he's wrong. You'd hate to find out that anyone in Australia acted on this bad information and did something to threaten Alam as a result of a newspaper blasting his picture on their front page.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: australia, journalism, terrorists

20 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 25 Sep 2014 @ 1:32pm

So is the newspaper liable under Australia's new natsec law for communicating about something terrorism related?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Sep 2014 @ 1:47pm

They reported he was dead, right? What exactly is he afraid of then, that people going to think he's a zombie terrorist?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- orbitalinsertion (profile), 25 Sep 2014 @ 3:44pm
  
  Re:
  Never underestimate the stupidity and bigotry of human beings. Of course they could see the picture in the paper and believe the image is of a legitimate terror suspect, yet think the gov covered something up by claiming he was was shot dead while in fact he is roaming the streets.
  
  Of course, being just a little too brown while sporting certain features, styles, or beliefs will net you ZOMG MUZLAM TERRIZT anyway from some types.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Toestubber (profile), 25 Sep 2014 @ 11:16pm
    
    Re: Re:
    Exactly. Any amateur vigilante seeking to stalk neighborhood terrorists is unlikely to read the article. They'll just look at the pictures.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Ninja (profile), 26 Sep 2014 @ 11:42am
    
    Re: Re:
    That.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Ninja (profile), 26 Sep 2014 @ 11:44am
    
    Re: Re:
    Er, hit submit by mistake. Again.
    
    That. The paper would need to make great efforts to dispel such incident giving him another front page with big letters "NOT THE TERRORIST". Even then this guy will be at risk, unfortunately.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
ACasey (profile), 25 Sep 2014 @ 1:53pm

Wow, legacy journalism has been really bad lately. The New York Times using "he said, she said"; no fact-checking on the whole guy invented e-mail thing...

What's next? TMZ being cited as a source in a MSNBC article?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- mr. sim (profile), 25 Sep 2014 @ 2:03pm
  
  Re:
  tmz was cited several times by msnbc on stories about celebs
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- PRMan, 26 Sep 2014 @ 6:01am
  
  Re:
  Hey. TMZ did some tough investigative work on the Ray Rice story. This month, they're one of the few sites actually doing journalism.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Sep 2014 @ 1:56pm

Even if they got the RIGHT Facebook profile, there's no guarantee that a profile photo actually shows the person named in the profile.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- ACasey (profile), 25 Sep 2014 @ 1:58pm
  
  Re:
  I always wondered why picturing yourself in a profile pic was not required by FB's terms of service.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Sep 2014 @ 2:12pm

would not be surprised if the police did not show up to take him in for questioning. Under the auspicions of being labeled a terrorist. Since only terrorists are labeled terrorists if we go by their usual backwards thinking.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Sep 2014 @ 2:16pm

His problems are only starting. Wait until he gets near an airplane or some other object the American Empire seems afraid of.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Sep 2014 @ 2:46pm

On the other hand...
At least his name is not Achmed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Sep 2014 @ 7:23pm

Sounds like a libel suit waiting to happen. Even with the retraction this sounds precisely the kind of thing that they could cite damages for.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 26 Sep 2014 @ 7:57am

"was apparently an instance of editors pulling down Facebook photos and getting them confused"

I wonder what his FB privacy settings were.
If idiots in the media can do this, who else can?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 26 Sep 2014 @ 8:56am

At least they're sorry; that makes everything better...

...not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
McGehee (profile), 26 Sep 2014 @ 5:43pm

Establishment media
Layers and layers of fact-checkers and editors.

Layers and layers, I tell you!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Sep 2014 @ 1:54am

Instead of facebook asking us to tag our friends on every god-damnd picture we see, maybe we could do tag-a-terrorist. Just pop up "is this person a terrorist" everytime the algorithm spots a face. Would be the best thing for national security -- which, btw, I didn't realize they had in Australia.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Sep 2014 @ 1:49am

Do not worry my friend, be "contempt" in knowing you are a collateral damage, and that your sacrafice will serv youre countries government well in its future endeavours
[ link to this | view in chronology ]