The logic is sound. So obviously those monopolists need to be split up.
First off, Newspapers will need to drop the classified sections altogether - that is unlawful bundling of content and advertising.
Then the politics, lifestyle, and sports sections need their own separate companies.
Obviously under this new plan local newspapers will only be allowed to report on local news. Advertising of course will have to be handled by a separate company.
And to prevent undue overburdening, the newspapers will only be allowed to deliver printed papers - no more internet "publishing."
"Deranged" is crying like a baby someone points out that Trump lies. Or dodged the draft. Or cheated on his pregnant wife. Or backstabbed our allies. Or tries to fill a moat with alligators. Or builds a wall around Colorado.
Your argument is that 3D printing won't get better because it will always be bad? Admittedly, it's a hard statement to argue with...
It really is hard to be more ignorant that that, but Blue Balls tries so hard to top himself each time.
3d printing is getting cheaper and easier every year. The IP aspects really have some companies shitting their pants, and firing off barrages of unfounded lawsuits.
Designing the STLs used in 3d printing isn't easy - but there are some great designers who love sharing their work. Bet it Lego or Warhammer, this makes corporations very angry and censorious.
It's a revolution of manufacturing putting tools in the hands of the people, so of course corporations are going to leverage outdated copyright laws to slam on the brakes.
There is no doubt corporations abuse copyright for the purpose of censorship but that is not all that copyright is.
Copyright is inherently only the right to censor speech. "I can publish this but you can't."
It is true that individuals can hold copyrights - but do you have the same right granted to corporations to scan my ISP traffic in case I'm infringing on your works?
If, as some here insist, that corporations have no "right" to free speech, how can they have the right to inhibit mine?
On the post: Indian Court Orders Global Takedown Of 'Defamatory' Video From YouTube, Twitter, Facebook
Re: Re: Overuse Trolls
Have you ever considered using a registered account an not behaving like a spammer, Blue Balls?
Didn't think so.
On the post: Indian Court Orders Global Takedown Of 'Defamatory' Video From YouTube, Twitter, Facebook
Re: Anyone ??
ECA What does that have to do with India, or global censorship?
On the post: Indian Court Orders Global Takedown Of 'Defamatory' Video From YouTube, Twitter, Facebook
Re: Overuse Of Copyright
First, individual humans have rights, corporations do NOT.
Starting with Copyright, right? Corporations - like Hollywood movie companies - CAN'T hold Copyrights to the movies they make by your "logic."
Any what the hell does this have to do with the article, which you clearly haven't read?
On the post: Google And Facebook Didn't Kill Newspapers: The Internet Did
Split em UP!
The logic is sound. So obviously those monopolists need to be split up.
First off, Newspapers will need to drop the classified sections altogether - that is unlawful bundling of content and advertising.
Then the politics, lifestyle, and sports sections need their own separate companies.
Obviously under this new plan local newspapers will only be allowed to report on local news. Advertising of course will have to be handled by a separate company.
And to prevent undue overburdening, the newspapers will only be allowed to deliver printed papers - no more internet "publishing."
On the post: TV Network Declares IPTV Tool Copyright Infringing, Even Though It's Just A Tool
Re:
Well all home monitors. When will the monitor companies put proper safeguards in place to prevent the display of copyrighted materials!!
On the post: TV Network Declares IPTV Tool Copyright Infringing, Even Though It's Just A Tool
Re:
civil society sanctions it
You mean, like when civil society condemns corporate use of copyrights?
The people have spoken!
On the post: Aussie Censorship In Action: National Enquirer Editor Threats Get Bookstores To Block Sale Of Ronan Farrow Book
Re: Re: Re: Where's the "censorship"? This isn't government.
According to "Blue Balls" it's censorship when TD won't publish the 175 stories he's submitted. (All slash fiction.)
On the post: Aussie Censorship In Action: National Enquirer Editor Threats Get Bookstores To Block Sale Of Ronan Farrow Book
Re: Re:
"Deranged" is crying like a baby someone points out that Trump lies. Or dodged the draft. Or cheated on his pregnant wife. Or backstabbed our allies. Or tries to fill a moat with alligators. Or builds a wall around Colorado.
On the post: TV Network Declares IPTV Tool Copyright Infringing, Even Though It's Just A Tool
And maybe, just maybe, one TV industry player will learn a lesson about firing off DMCA notices without actually knowing what its talking about.
Still Zero consequences for filing bogus complaints...
On the post: Lego's Mostly Obnoxious IP Bullying Of The 3D Printing Community Doesn't Make Any Sense
Re: Re: Re: this is such an important topic!
Your argument is that 3D printing won't get better because it will always be bad? Admittedly, it's a hard statement to argue with...
It really is hard to be more ignorant that that, but Blue Balls tries so hard to top himself each time.
3d printing is getting cheaper and easier every year. The IP aspects really have some companies shitting their pants, and firing off barrages of unfounded lawsuits.
Designing the STLs used in 3d printing isn't easy - but there are some great designers who love sharing their work. Bet it Lego or Warhammer, this makes corporations very angry and censorious.
It's a revolution of manufacturing putting tools in the hands of the people, so of course corporations are going to leverage outdated copyright laws to slam on the brakes.
On the post: Lego's Mostly Obnoxious IP Bullying Of The 3D Printing Community Doesn't Make Any Sense
Just STFU and stop with such spammy posts and maybe the filters won't stop your oh so important posts.
Please explain again why Mike's site is so much better than the one you run?
On the post: Steak With A Side Of Surveillance: Outback Restaurants Adding Employee-Tracking Analytics To Its Cameras
Re: Google Developing System to Spy on Employees
Oooh. It says there that this is the system that Hillary used to trick people into her sex basement under the pizza place!!
On the post: No, Internet Companies Do Not Get A 'Free Pass' Thanks To CDA 230
Re: So to be clear,
Stormfront get offended when it doesn't get a free pass and that upsets you. What does that have to do with this article again?
On the post: Phoenix Cop Sues Department To Block Investigation Of Officers' Questionable Social Media Posts
Re: Re: Re:
I'm saying the police should be held to higher standards.
Once those posts become brought to the attention of the department, as these were, they become a valid public concern.
But hey, if the cops can do no wrong then nothing to see here.
On the post: Phoenix Cop Sues Department To Block Investigation Of Officers' Questionable Social Media Posts
Re:
Yeah, it's funny how we think police departments shouldn't hire complete dirtbags.
On the post: House Overwhelmingly Votes To Empower Copyright Trolls And To Bankrupt Americans For Sharing Photos
Re: Makin' Money...Finally
Not unless you register the video with the US Copyright office. Unregistered it'd be capped at half that, if I remember correctly?
On the post: Ajit Pai Whines About The Numerous State-Level Net Neutrality Laws He Just Helped Create
Re: Re: Re:
Four dead in Bangladesh riot over offensive Facebook post
So should Facebook be outlawed because people riot whenever their religion is offended?
Seems like a good reason to outlaw religions.
On the post: House Overwhelmingly Votes To Empower Copyright Trolls And To Bankrupt Americans For Sharing Photos
Re: Re: Free Speech vs Copyright
There is no doubt corporations abuse copyright for the purpose of censorship but that is not all that copyright is.
Copyright is inherently only the right to censor speech. "I can publish this but you can't."
It is true that individuals can hold copyrights - but do you have the same right granted to corporations to scan my ISP traffic in case I'm infringing on your works?
If, as some here insist, that corporations have no "right" to free speech, how can they have the right to inhibit mine?
On the post: Facebook's Failure To Stop TikTok Shows, Once Again, That Big Companies Often Can't Just 'Copy' Disruptive Upstarts
At least I can still post my pro Hong Kong memes on FB. :)
On the post: House Overwhelmingly Votes To Empower Copyright Trolls And To Bankrupt Americans For Sharing Photos
Free Speech vs Copyright
Free speech is a right of all people. Copyright is the right of corporations to censor that right.
Which is more important? Which is more fundamental?
You'll never hear Blue Balls answer that...
Next >>