ADS-B does not require intended destination to be transmitted (at least at this point). The capability may be there, but I don't see reference to it. It does need heading, altitude, speed, aircraft callsign, aircraft type, and distance.
Why wouldn't it? Each airframe gets a unique 24-bit ADS-B identifier, much like an IMEI number or MAC address.
And also... Air Force One is the call sign given to *any* plane that the president is on... Not just the two 747s that most people think of. When he vacationed in Maine over the 4th of July, a Gulfstream carried the call sign.
So, knowing the ADS-B identifier doesn't tell you who is on the plane. Just what plane it is.
@Robert - all aircraft in North American Air Space are supposed to be ADS-B Out equipped by 2020... But there is no other mandate that I can see out there.
@Chris: Well there's more to it. There's really 3 parties there in SSL: the browser (also, an attacker), the CA, and certificate holder. Everyone has to validate each other, and not a single one REALLY knows who each other is at the time that SSL is creating the secured connection. The same holds true with DRM, really. Splitting hairs though.
@Karl: The single player campaigns suck. The real fun begins when you get on line and play other humans. But yes, you're right. You can play cracked copies without an internet connection - but you're missing 80% (IMO) of the game...
This is true... However, my bet is that the next version will (like Steam) "require" internet connectivity. That way, when something like this occurs, you just replace the master key...
Oh. Wait. That's how standard SSL works. Funny, that.
Then, that 4-second HDCP handshake will turn into 12 as all device certificates are validated at a central clearing house (I bet Verisign is frothing at the mouth for this).
Waldrop at the linked CNet article: "We believe that this technology will remain effective," he said. "There's a large install base of licensed devices including several hundred licensees that will continue to use it and in any case, were a (circumvention) device to appear that attempts to take advantage of this particular hack there are legal remedies, particularly under the DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act)."
Allow me to paraphrase: "Yeah. We've sold a lot of shit, so we have to say it's gonna stay viable, and if some joker thinks he's gonna screw us, we'll sue his ass into oblivion!"
Hey Tom? Welcome to the new Internet. It's the place where things like the Streisand effect happen. You know, where you try to crush some small guy with a lawsuit, and DMCA, and other crap... And the rest of the world knows more about what you're trying to crush than you do. DVD Jon ring a bell?
Reading through the site's main page (I'd link to a specific section, but can't - poor site coding) it appears that Turnbow owns the copyright to the song - purely. Aronson gave up his rights to that for 100 CDs of the album that he only helped in writing a part of the lyrics for one song.
The video though, that's another story... Here's my question - if Aronson had wanted to send it in, he would have absolutely had to get a waiver from Turnbow, as he was the "subject" of the clip. I mean, that's why they fuzz out faces on Cops, right? But what about Turnbow? It looks to me like this may be one of those shitty Joint Ownership things, where the "Author" (in this case, Aronson) would own the rights, but couldn't do squat without permission from the subject, Turnbow. I dunno. It's all just silly really.
Last point though, couldn't this all be done under Fair Use? I mean, it was for "educational" purposes (though Moore made dough, obviously).
Makes you wonder though... Who owns it? Apparently NBC doesn't... Right? Do the Emmy's?? I just wonder who could actually do the asking for a takedown...
"OMG, good thing it only took them "a few weeks" to stop that knife waving maniac. Who knows what kind of havoc he could cause if it took them "several" weeks instead."
Re: Re: If it's *required* by the job, then pay *more*.
Well... I think that out_of was commenting about a comment made by AC to Stella's comment. AC's comment was employer indeterminate, and so out_of gets to call employers "The Rich". Why? Because rich doesn't have to be about money... It can be used as a descriptor of any resource... Minerals, cows, manure, and, yes, jobs. If I were an employer, I can decide who gets a job and who doesn't (within some guidelines, obviously), and so I am "rich" with employment opportunities. Savvy?
See, what you do (even years ago, but easier now) is claim it was stolen a day or two after. Sprint leaves a few calls on your bill, then you have the numbers. You may have had to wait until your bill showed, but still... It's easier now because you can see calls almost as they happen on your online account.
Re: Conflicting statements, more investment with competition and 'monopoly rents'. !!
@darryl... You have got to be one of the worst trolls I've ever seen...
You ask for statistics behind a claim, then spout an opposing claim, and then you don't offer statistics?
But believing that companies grow and shrink due to competition in the market is wrong, they grown and shrink due to demand for their product. Yes, competition changes the demand, or puts new demands on them, thats called competitionm, and it results in cheaper and better services for customers.
The fact that most companies grow and shrink based on demand for a product is true... However, that really only works in the case of physical widgets. In something like digital services (TV, telephone, internet, etc.) the "product" is bandwidth... And most of the infrastructure that is there today can scale pretty well. What can't is the "bandwidth" a provider is willing to dedicate.
As to your discussion on monopolies and competition, you're so far out in left field, I need a set of binoculars to see you. Name me a city with more than one traditional telco, or more than one traditional cable provider. One that can cover the entire city. I'd be surprised if you can. In all the cities I've lived in over the past twenty years, there hasn't been a single one where I had a choice in telco's or cable providers (Oklahoma City, OK; Lansing, MI; Grand Rapids, MI; Chicago, IL; Memphis, TN; Portland, ME). Why is that? Because competition is hard. Monopolies are easy.
They are not just competing with other telco's they are competing with the general cost of living, employment, descresionary money for people to spend, food, electriciy, rent, mortgages and so on. Are all competition for the customer dollar.
While some services compete with other COL expenses, most people have made the decision that they can't live without (at least) internet, so you can throw your customer dollar competition right out the window.
And if you want to restrict to only telco's there appears to be more than one player in the industry, and its possible for you or me to enter the market. Nothing stopping us, so by definition it is not a monopoly..
Really? Sure, there's more than one player... Funny how their territories don't overlap. And I'd like to see you enter the market. Where do you get funding/capital to do so? You have to lay all new lines - pretty expensive, because guess what - the people that own the lines currently? They aren't going to let you use them. No investor in their right mind is going to give you the capital - it's too big. So, you either have to be big already (i.e., Google), or you're screwed.
Also... Use a freaking spell-checker. Or did one of your brothers Larry or Darryl get it today?
On the post: Plane Finder Phone App Called An 'Aid To Terrorism,' Even If It's Just Using Public Data
Re: Re: Re: Re:
http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/service_units/enroute/surv eillance_broadcast/general_information/media/factsheet.pdf
On the post: Plane Finder Phone App Called An 'Aid To Terrorism,' Even If It's Just Using Public Data
Re: Re:
And also... Air Force One is the call sign given to *any* plane that the president is on... Not just the two 747s that most people think of. When he vacationed in Maine over the 4th of July, a Gulfstream carried the call sign.
So, knowing the ADS-B identifier doesn't tell you who is on the plane. Just what plane it is.
@Robert - all aircraft in North American Air Space are supposed to be ADS-B Out equipped by 2020... But there is no other mandate that I can see out there.
On the post: Intel Confirms HDCP Master Key Is Out
Re: Re: Re: Re:
@Karl: The single player campaigns suck. The real fun begins when you get on line and play other humans. But yes, you're right. You can play cracked copies without an internet connection - but you're missing 80% (IMO) of the game...
On the post: IHOP Sues IHOP; Trademark Battle Pits Pancakes vs. God
Re:
On the post: Intel Confirms HDCP Master Key Is Out
Re: Re:
Oh. Wait. That's how standard SSL works. Funny, that.
Then, that 4-second HDCP handshake will turn into 12 as all device certificates are validated at a central clearing house (I bet Verisign is frothing at the mouth for this).
On the post: Intel Confirms HDCP Master Key Is Out
"We believe that this technology will remain effective," he said. "There's a large install base of licensed devices including several hundred licensees that will continue to use it and in any case, were a (circumvention) device to appear that attempts to take advantage of this particular hack there are legal remedies, particularly under the DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act)."
Allow me to paraphrase: "Yeah. We've sold a lot of shit, so we have to say it's gonna stay viable, and if some joker thinks he's gonna screw us, we'll sue his ass into oblivion!"
Hey Tom? Welcome to the new Internet. It's the place where things like the Streisand effect happen. You know, where you try to crush some small guy with a lawsuit, and DMCA, and other crap... And the rest of the world knows more about what you're trying to crush than you do. DVD Jon ring a bell?
On the post: Richard Blumenthal, Lead Threatener Of Craigslist, Doesn't Even Have Jurisdiction Over Prostitution
Re: He's pimping himself
On the post: Anti-SLAPP Law Used To Protect Michael Moore's Use Of Video Clip
Methinks Aronson Doth Protest Too Much...
Reading through the site's main page (I'd link to a specific section, but can't - poor site coding) it appears that Turnbow owns the copyright to the song - purely. Aronson gave up his rights to that for 100 CDs of the album that he only helped in writing a part of the lyrics for one song.
The video though, that's another story... Here's my question - if Aronson had wanted to send it in, he would have absolutely had to get a waiver from Turnbow, as he was the "subject" of the clip. I mean, that's why they fuzz out faces on Cops, right? But what about Turnbow? It looks to me like this may be one of those shitty Joint Ownership things, where the "Author" (in this case, Aronson) would own the rights, but couldn't do squat without permission from the subject, Turnbow. I dunno. It's all just silly really.
Last point though, couldn't this all be done under Fair Use? I mean, it was for "educational" purposes (though Moore made dough, obviously).
On the post: Ridiculous Content Restrictions Mean NBC Loses Viral Buzz For Emmy Clips
Re:
On the post: A Rose Is A Rose Is A Rose... Until Police See It On CCTV, Say It's A Knife & Throw You In Jail For 3 Months
Re:
On the post: A Rose Is A Rose Is A Rose... Until Police See It On CCTV, Say It's A Knife & Throw You In Jail For 3 Months
Re: Re: Re: Thrown in jail for carrying a knife?
On the post: Rupert Murdoch's Anti-Fair Use Comments Used Against Him In Court Yet Again
Re: Fair use myth
On the post: Does Checking Your Email On Your BlackBerry Count As Overtime?
Re: Re: If it's *required* by the job, then pay *more*.
On the post: Discovery Channel Forcing Deadliest Catch Fan Site Offline; Claims Embedding Official Videos Infringes
On the post: Time To Face Facts: Broadband Caps Are Really About Protecting Video Revenue
Re:
Looks like Bell is the chintziest with a whopping 1GB total activity for $20/month??? WTF??? My DNS requests total more than 1GB.
I guess I'm glad I don't live THERE.
On the post: Funny How All The Senators Supporting Anti-FCC Bill, Have Raised Lots Of Money From AT&T
Re:
http://demint.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=cd4ae03f-e2 60-438d-8e3f-903c8112b625 I'll say this, the gasbag has been claiming that he would do this since mid-June...
On the post: Funny How All The Senators Supporting Anti-FCC Bill, Have Raised Lots Of Money From AT&T
Re: I know A Lot About All This Stuff
Thanks for your input!
On the post: If You're Going To Steal Something, Perhaps Avoid A Phone Demoing A GPS Tracking Program
Re: Well that's Good News
See, what you do (even years ago, but easier now) is claim it was stolen a day or two after. Sprint leaves a few calls on your bill, then you have the numbers. You may have had to wait until your bill showed, but still... It's easier now because you can see calls almost as they happen on your online account.
On the post: Wall Street Calling Telcos' Bluff On Stopping Investment If Net Neutrality Put Into Law
Re: Conflicting statements, more investment with competition and 'monopoly rents'. !!
As to your discussion on monopolies and competition, you're so far out in left field, I need a set of binoculars to see you. Name me a city with more than one traditional telco, or more than one traditional cable provider. One that can cover the entire city. I'd be surprised if you can. In all the cities I've lived in over the past twenty years, there hasn't been a single one where I had a choice in telco's or cable providers (Oklahoma City, OK; Lansing, MI; Grand Rapids, MI; Chicago, IL; Memphis, TN; Portland, ME). Why is that? Because competition is hard. Monopolies are easy. While some services compete with other COL expenses, most people have made the decision that they can't live without (at least) internet, so you can throw your customer dollar competition right out the window. Really? Sure, there's more than one player... Funny how their territories don't overlap. And I'd like to see you enter the market. Where do you get funding/capital to do so? You have to lay all new lines - pretty expensive, because guess what - the people that own the lines currently? They aren't going to let you use them. No investor in their right mind is going to give you the capital - it's too big. So, you either have to be big already (i.e., Google), or you're screwed.
Also... Use a freaking spell-checker. Or did one of your brothers Larry or Darryl get it today?
On the post: FCC Finally Admits US Broadband Competitiveness Sucks; Broadband Co's Then Order Their Favorite Politicians To Trash FCC
Re: Re:
Next >>