Rupert Murdoch's Anti-Fair Use Comments Used Against Him In Court Yet Again
from the careful-what-you-wish-for dept
Remember back when Rupert Murdoch acted like fair use was a myth that would be "barred by the courts" when challenged? Yeah, that's been coming back to bite Murdoch. Earlier this year, we noted that a former advisor to Michael Jackson was suing News Corp. over Fox News' decision to air interview footage without a license, and the complaint highlighted Murdoch's anti-fair use statement. Of course, when it came time to defend itself (guess what?) News Corp. lawyers relied heavily on fair use.Looks like that's happening again. News Corp. has been sued yet again for copyright infringement, this time for airing a video (without licensing the clip) of Brad Pitt having trouble driving a motorcycle. Instead, Fox News folks simply downloaded it from TMZ, a property owned by AOL. Wait a second... so with Rupert Murdoch running all over the place claiming that Google News linking to his content is "theft," yet Fox News has no problem downloading a video from a competing media organization and using it? Fascinating.
And, of course, the folks suing waste little time before bringing up Murdoch's comments on "fair use" in the complaint itself (bottom of page 2):
![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, fair use, fox news, rupert murdoch
Companies: news corp.
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Next he will try to carve out some "exceptions".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hypocrisy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hypocrisy
Both sides are suspect at this point, the system is broken.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hypocrisy
the definition of 'republican' being 'one who advocates a republic' and a republic being a 'government that is not a monarchy'.
find me an American who's Not a republican, at least in public :D
Democrats in the American sense get an added whammy of hypocrisy, mind you. They're name implies they support democracy... reality says otherwise.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Hypocrisy
in case anyone was confused.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Hypocrisy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hypocrisy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hypocrisy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hypocrisy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hypocrisy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Easy Solution
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Easy Solution
News corp already has done the "no-follow" thing. It put up a paywall.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
While it is certainly entertaining to imagine Rupert in front of his computer, giggling in demonic glee and emailing Bill O'Reilly the video - its irrational to believe that he should be personally accountable for the actions of some anonymous segment producer. If we're going to play the "Murdoch-is-a-hypocrite" card, we, as champions of the virtue and benevolence of fair use, might look kind of stupid if we can't even get the basic definition of "fair" right.
Murdoch is a hypocrite, without doubt. As chief executive, he is infinitely more involved with his operation's legal representation than for the day-to-day activities of some video jockey; fair use being a legal matter, it is difficult to justify how his position could be lost in translation. But a low-level corporate drone? If we're going to try to blame Murdoch for the video AND for the legal defense simultaneously, we're put in a logically precarious position where News Corp is staffed top to bottom by worshipers of the Scripture According to Murdoch.
And honestly, that scenario is so disturbing that upon noticing, the Universe would immediately collapse in on itself, bewildered at how badly it misjudged it's scheduled appointment with The End and profoundly apologetic for this terribly unfortunate termination of service.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It's not like Fox has some policy of only using their own clips and some random "video jockey" decided, one time, to use a clip from another source.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
That is expensive. Bloviating is so much cheaper.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If we're going to try to blame Murdoch for the video AND for the legal defense simultaneously, we're put in a logically precarious position where News Corp is staffed top to bottom by worshipers of the Scripture According to Murdoch.
You expect consistancy from Mike ??
But well said, and quite correct..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: “Fair Use” Hypocrisy
...isn't it a little disingenuous to take the moral high-road of agreeing with Fox's invocation of fair use, then immediately condemn Murdoch as "astoundingly hypocritical" by misrepresenting the circumstances?
In what way is this “misrepresenting the circumstances”?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Wait how is it demonizing him to accurately point out his comments and then point out that the company he controls is actively using the thing he hates as a legal defense.
Murdoch is a hypocrite, without doubt.
Hmm. You just yelled at me for calling him that. Now I'm confused.
If we're going to try to blame Murdoch for the video AND for the legal defense simultaneously, we're put in a logically precarious position where News Corp is staffed top to bottom by worshipers of the Scripture According to Murdoch.
We're not talking about a staffer. We're talking about News Corps' official response to lawsuits. That comes from the top.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Quantum Mechanics Resolves This ;~)
The Schr�dinger equations lead us to the understanding that chaotic systems create a random matrix of possible states making it impossible to determine with any great degree of accuracy or certainty the position he will take at a given moment in time.
{/sarcasm}
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Quantum Mechanics Resolves This ;~)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Quantum Mechanics Resolves This ;~)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Quantum Mechanics Resolves This ;~)
Frakin cat shoud have died the first time around. Frakin 50% mirrors...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Quantum Mechanics Resolves This ;~)
http://icanhascheezburger.com/tag/schrodinger/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
All According To Rupert's Plan?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: All According To Rupert's Plan?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: All According To Rupert's Plan?
Really long rant excluded ....
Obama administration ???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
News Corps new motto.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Murdoch and money
Maybe that's not such a bad thing.
The Billionaires Bankrolling the Tea Party
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Fair use myth
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
goal
the truth will show that with all the eggs in military and entertainment , both which will soon not be needed if needed now LOL , soon will fail and thus collapse the usa for good into a third world wannabe
[ link to this | view in chronology ]