And yes! The little blue pill is no longer covered by my policy so you're stuck with it you little blue fucks. (please note the correct usage of "you" and "are" in the conjunction "you're" - it's not fucking "YOUR" - get it right or don't write because it's hard to read.. right?)
Bad half you ask? Fuck the law! Fuck IcE. Fuck SCOTUS. Fuck drug dealers. Fuck jersey stealers! Fuck the UcA!
and fuck all you hoes making a living off the backs of the living and fuck all you mother fuckers manifesting your beliefs into "$" the swastika of today. Fascist pigs!
And we should pay the artists by paying the guys that are fronting the artists' protection fees? Media monsters? Via horrendous offers of cable and wireless combined with Media's delirium, whose tools and services are complete nonsense? Verstandan!
Seems lawyers can't loose can they? Everyone else? Business as usual.
You do have a point being that seizures and whatnot currently take place under some mystery, wobbly and distorted interpretation of current laws where any significant challenge requires vast resources.
So I wonder what truths the text of this law will discover?
What are the facts? What I'd like to know is who, in fact, wants this new law and why? Where did it come from? Is there really a mystery pool of money that has not been bled into hands already full?
On another vein I'd like to know when we're going to get a fucking law that does something to help all of us, one besides funding the government for another quarter or two?
When are we going to get a ruling from the bench that benefits the lot of us?
When does that shit trickle down? Because this inverted gravity on rights thing is beginning to become intolerably uncomfortable?
Basically, PROTECT-IP is yet another little fucking annoying god damn edict from people with means whose brunt is borne by those with little.
Senator Wyden appears to be but one of an alarmingly small handful of folks charged with steering this US ship that seems to understand their task from the basest of levels.
There's not much to discuss really. Semantics?
Yes, we could definitely do with some truths right about now, let's leave the fantasy for future judgments.
Now *that* is a fucking brilliant statement. Surely you do not believe this? That would imply that you're truly alone and can not grasp anything going on around you, past, present and future.
Mind-bogglingly ignorant thing to think much less say. Utter nonsense.
So this begs a question: Can I torrent those listings marked "Free"?
If not than why not?
If so than what signal might that send to "big media" a.k.a mega copyright "*holders*"?
Perhaps that their new revenue model is what cable's used to be (going down that - I'd say) and what every other website's currently is? As in providing a service other than the crooked gangster powder pushing chick flinging trash dumping thug thumping shake down services?
Like any other typical law mongering cunt you know damn good and well that they'll be subject to secret interpretation, misused and abused in sinister fashion. Know that this has become yet another pathetic attempt to bolster the now truly pathetic cries of a dying delivery system.
Here's a suggestion - have your client license their shit for what it's worth and not for what they think it's worth thereby rendering our already grossly overweight legal burden one item lighter. We are everywhere, now. No schedules, no countries and could pretty much care less about you and your interpretation and justification for PROTECT-IP at this point. So, get it passed fuck-twat, you'll spur yet more innovation that you can cry about in the next round.
Perhaps, in the future, you could direct your misguided ass reamings to where they truly belong and get them out of my garden.
Hm.. that just does not look like da Vinci painting on a web site. Not even a little. He could be painting something though, I guess. Can almost make out the brush if I squint a little. That could be a Mosaic icon in his hand though.
The, uh, "artist" is dead. The song associated with the riff is over 70 years old. This guy, Mr. Larrikin is a fucking tool and epitomizes every second thing that's wrong with copyright extensions. 20 years, get paid, make something else then 20 more for you.
Some tool gets a dead guys (or gals) package and wants to reap without sowing anything? You're fucking kidding me right now right?
And some of you guys wonder why people "steal" your shit?.. because you're fat fucking lazy idiots than can't do much apart from "steal" your damn selves. We're coming.. you have no delivery stream lock in - we have evolved. We have evolved around you and will continue to as long as your fat, stupid, self-serving asses are still asking your, clearly, better halves to keep changing the channel for you.
You're fat, slow and stupid. Oh, and you suck.
PROTECT-IP - yeah, what-the-fuck ever.. and nobody smokes weed either.
Cheers!
Oh.. wait.. this is sarcastic isn't it? Well... then... I win!
That's not a viable alternative. That's ignorance manifesting itself through ignorance. My time is not your time so do not expect that my time and responsibilities can be allotted around your time. And whose going to feed these kids and change the diapers whilst ignorami insist that, as a fan, I do whatever it takes to show up in person?
With like due respect I would offer that this typical answer/point is all too rapidly becoming pure bullshit. One needs the influence/support of a party - and which party is representing the people these days whilst said representation is not cushioned within a bountiful harvest for those already with abundance? Once elected who gets their ears most often? - Who fills their re-election chests?
"We The People" is fast becoming a one way street, too fast.
Let them make their laws. Let them encroach the foundations of our very existence. Let them make our cake. More laws please, for the water will not boil over without them. There are no kings here and the cemetery gates are open.
These are elected officials? Senators no less, sworn to defend The Constitution? Aiming for The First Amendment? A "privilege" !? Yeah, eff off.
What time does the movie start? Can I bring my own popcorn? Are there going to be fireworks first?
I think, given today's communications capabilities, that we start to entertain (demand?) we be allowed to vote on everything.. Fuck Congress.. they're doing a shit job. And there's no way in hell a bunch of full health coverage having, high wage earners are representing the majority of Americans.
This whole online free speech assault.. I don't like it, not one bit I don't. Fuck industry. They can eat a dick.
On the post: ICE Seized 20 Domain Names For The NFL Over The Weekend
Re: Re:
I think I'm ok now. Thanks.
On the post: ICE Seized 20 Domain Names For The NFL Over The Weekend
Re:
Well there goes the better half of my argument.
Bad half you ask? Fuck the law! Fuck IcE. Fuck SCOTUS. Fuck drug dealers. Fuck jersey stealers! Fuck the UcA!
and fuck all you hoes making a living off the backs of the living and fuck all you mother fuckers manifesting your beliefs into "$" the swastika of today. Fascist pigs!
On the post: Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
Re:
Seems lawyers can't loose can they? Everyone else? Business as usual.
Diggity dig the poetry!
On the post: Wyden: PROTECT IP Act Is About Letting The Content Sector Attack The Innovation Sector
Re: facts
You do have a point being that seizures and whatnot currently take place under some mystery, wobbly and distorted interpretation of current laws where any significant challenge requires vast resources.
So I wonder what truths the text of this law will discover?
What are the facts? What I'd like to know is who, in fact, wants this new law and why? Where did it come from? Is there really a mystery pool of money that has not been bled into hands already full?
On another vein I'd like to know when we're going to get a fucking law that does something to help all of us, one besides funding the government for another quarter or two?
When are we going to get a ruling from the bench that benefits the lot of us?
When does that shit trickle down? Because this inverted gravity on rights thing is beginning to become intolerably uncomfortable?
Basically, PROTECT-IP is yet another little fucking annoying god damn edict from people with means whose brunt is borne by those with little.
Senator Wyden appears to be but one of an alarmingly small handful of folks charged with steering this US ship that seems to understand their task from the basest of levels.
There's not much to discuss really. Semantics?
Yes, we could definitely do with some truths right about now, let's leave the fantasy for future judgments.
On the post: Wyden: PROTECT IP Act Is About Letting The Content Sector Attack The Innovation Sector
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Mind-bogglingly ignorant thing to think much less say. Utter nonsense.
On the post: Wyden: PROTECT IP Act Is About Letting The Content Sector Attack The Innovation Sector
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
So this begs a question: Can I torrent those listings marked "Free"?
If not than why not?
If so than what signal might that send to "big media" a.k.a mega copyright "*holders*"?
Perhaps that their new revenue model is what cable's used to be (going down that - I'd say) and what every other website's currently is? As in providing a service other than the crooked gangster powder pushing chick flinging trash dumping thug thumping shake down services?
On the post: Wyden: PROTECT IP Act Is About Letting The Content Sector Attack The Innovation Sector
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Here's a suggestion - have your client license their shit for what it's worth and not for what they think it's worth thereby rendering our already grossly overweight legal burden one item lighter. We are everywhere, now. No schedules, no countries and could pretty much care less about you and your interpretation and justification for PROTECT-IP at this point. So, get it passed fuck-twat, you'll spur yet more innovation that you can cry about in the next round.
Perhaps, in the future, you could direct your misguided ass reamings to where they truly belong and get them out of my garden.
On the post: Wyden: PROTECT IP Act Is About Letting The Content Sector Attack The Innovation Sector
Re: Re: Re:
I had a point, I'm sure of it.
On the post: Insanity: Men At Work Lose Final Appeal For Using Brief Riff Of Classic Folks Song, Which Went Unnoticed For Decades
Re:
Nice.
On the post: Can You Infringe On Da Vinci? Judge Seems To Think So
Re:
On the post: Insanity: Men At Work Lose Final Appeal For Using Brief Riff Of Classic Folks Song, Which Went Unnoticed For Decades
Re:
Some tool gets a dead guys (or gals) package and wants to reap without sowing anything? You're fucking kidding me right now right?
And some of you guys wonder why people "steal" your shit?.. because you're fat fucking lazy idiots than can't do much apart from "steal" your damn selves. We're coming.. you have no delivery stream lock in - we have evolved. We have evolved around you and will continue to as long as your fat, stupid, self-serving asses are still asking your, clearly, better halves to keep changing the channel for you.
You're fat, slow and stupid. Oh, and you suck.
PROTECT-IP - yeah, what-the-fuck ever.. and nobody smokes weed either.
Cheers!
Oh.. wait.. this is sarcastic isn't it? Well... then... I win!
On the post: Here's A Surprise: EU Green Party Adopts The Pirate Party's Position On Copyright
Re:
On the post: Here's A Surprise: EU Green Party Adopts The Pirate Party's Position On Copyright
Target
What? Bitches can sink too..
On the post: Astrolabe Claims It Holds Copyright On Timezone Data; Sues Maintainers Of Public Timezone Database
Re: well done!
On the post: Justice Department Threatening US Sports Blogs Because Commenters Linked To Streaming Content
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Hollywood Applauds The Destruction Of The Public Domain... Even As Hollywood Exists Thanks To The Public Domain
And there you have hit, a perfect example by definition. Absolutely no sharing nor downloading involved. Stealing is what it is.
Media drug dealers. Let the prohibition continue!
On the post: RIAA Law Lets Law Enforcement Ignore 4th Amendment, Search Private Property With No Warrants
Re: Re: Re: Re: One has to wonder
"We The People" is fast becoming a one way street, too fast.
Let them make their laws. Let them encroach the foundations of our very existence. Let them make our cake. More laws please, for the water will not boil over without them. There are no kings here and the cemetery gates are open.
On the post: Access To Italian Wikipedia Blocked In Protest Of Wiretapping Bill In Italy [Updated]
That's my One World One Human Vote and I'm sticking to it.
On the post: NY State Senators Say We've Got Too Much Free Speech; Introduce Bill To Fix That
Elected?
What time does the movie start? Can I bring my own popcorn? Are there going to be fireworks first?
I think, given today's communications capabilities, that we start to entertain (demand?) we be allowed to vote on everything.. Fuck Congress.. they're doing a shit job. And there's no way in hell a bunch of full health coverage having, high wage earners are representing the majority of Americans.
This whole online free speech assault.. I don't like it, not one bit I don't. Fuck industry. They can eat a dick.
On the post: University Police & Administration Freak Out Over Nathan Fillion Firefly Poster; Censor, Threaten Professor
Re:
Next >>