I think you're the closest. I think the AC is a beam stretcher.
The comparison on technical grounds though accurate does not account for the fact that a person, behind the cell phone, is readily located, tracked and logged. The wi-fi is just kind of sort of really just sitting there. You can track the internet with wi-fi. You can track the person with the phone. Which one do you think smells like danger? I think I know which one I'd fight for. We're twisted.
Yes, we should test the next generation of warhead on Righthaven then. .. and use the $5000 to pay any fallout victims who in turn get to be the lucky ones that get to use the shorter security lines on the ABS machines and this 300MM can go to feeding and educating the children that find themselves in surroundings that make it difficult to be fed and educated in. Good plan!
>>Google, eBay, Amazon, Facebook, and Digg have to remove pirate sites, but none can be taken down under the language of PROTECT IP themselves
I think this is what gets me all riled up about the perception of prescriptive law supporting businesses that suck.. but I like this part - "PROTECT IP themselves"
Find your own effing crap and take care of it.. and if you can't then make more effing crap and take -> better
Hrm.. if you really and truly believe that any (another) law is just in that it criminalizes linking then I truly, really believe you are in need of an additional hole in your head so you can breath. The net is being cast ever wider, the hands on our throats ever tighter, laws are binding this nation to stakes in the desert and those that write them and enforce them and "manage" them are above them. Why? Because people like you "aren't doing anything wrong and have nothing to worry about". Inch by inch, inch by inch. The government should fear its peoples and I smell fear.
And for what? Money? Great. Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt is what your government is using to guide you dear fellow.
The Internet swells and raises the voices of the quiet. It's getting louder, incessant, it's threatening the corridors of power and soon more laws will not be enough.. or we will be made quiet.
You seem to be reaching into a cookie jar with no cookies.
They changed (usurped) DNS entries. So what? This in no way shape or form denies entry to what was originally behind said changed DNS records. They've "prevented" nothing. You cannot circumvent a block when there is no block. It's really quite simple actually.
It might be like.. perhaps.. taping over the title of a book or perhaps changing the library's DD entry for the title but leaving it on the shelf - if you really wants it.. finds it.. Yeah, hide and seek.
However, I suspect your argument is not entirely off base consider ass munch lunacy these days - thus, I'd suspect, the tool is authored by "anonymous" - the law (ICE) would, truly, have a real live, life size whac-a-mole game.
So I say go it - challenge it - bring on censorship circumvention technological advances and enhancements - bitches and hoes knows.\r
ICE has done, effectively, nothing until they decide to press charges. Their actions, while on the surface may appear technological, are effectively meaningless annoying censorship attempts wherein they, clearly, haven't the foggiest about what they're dealing with (If I turn off my TV the world will no longer be able to watch it - type of stuff). They're attempting to insert government control of the Internet where the government has none, nor will it ever especially as it pertains the PEOPLE, their VOICES and their CHOICES. They(us are them, them are us) can only succeed with dark wires. LAW and INTERNET - the perfect conundrum. IMHO the future of the global society and the wellness of its peoples.\r
I think the manager should let the door hit him in the ass. I think dumb people are dumb. I don't think I want to listen. I've only just heard a Canadian artist and I don't want to ruin the taste in my mouth and *gasp* she even lets people hear her stuff *gasp* for free (http://www.reverbnation.com/hayleysales)! The shock, the awe - the absolute abomination that *is* the internet.
Eat it Mr. Cameron, cause you may go hungry for a bit.
"The choice is made by the content provider, not the conduit for it's delivery"
Their choice was, in fact, the conduit. Once released upon the conduit you can crunch and scrunch any damn way you please. If they publish and allow public access they have granted irrevocable "rights" for any single thing that can sniff the wire, listen, read and paint.
done. game is over. no more dice. no two out of three. hasta.
If all the evidence gathered is the IP of a wireless router and stops and have none of the MACs associated with the NAT distributions nor their connection times then they, in fact, have very, very little evidence. They would have a public WAP identity and that is all (and thanks to the college a name for the NAT'd IP). Secured or not they need what is behind the router. Surely, concrete evidence can not stop at the NAT distribution point for the identification of a single infringer. Concrete nothingness that is.
A router routes things behind it, yes? The crooks drove over that bridge there -> ! Who owns this bridge!? Patently ridiculous - much like the current business model.
\r
A government entity propped up in front of a public one no less. And flying is "standard" transportation ass. Unless of course you're perhaps rickety ancient or still consider air travel a luxury only for the well off.
No chance you could become a chuckle choker real quick like eh? A shame some are endowed with the ability to breath much less type.
On the post: Arresting People Associated With Anonymous Unlikely To Have The Impact The Feds Expect
Re: Re:
wars-
drugs
terror
p2p
information control
poor folks
anonymous humans
On the post: Senators Ask Ingelligence Boss If He Thinks He Can Track People's Phone Locations
Re: Re:
The comparison on technical grounds though accurate does not account for the fact that a person, behind the cell phone, is readily located, tracked and logged. The wi-fi is just kind of sort of really just sitting there. You can track the internet with wi-fi. You can track the person with the phone. Which one do you think smells like danger? I think I know which one I'd fight for. We're twisted.
On the post: DHS Requests $300 Million To Purchase Even More Devices That Don't Work
Re: Punishment will be far more than $5000
On the post: Killing The Golden Goose: Is Hollywood To Blame For Netflix's Poorly Thought Out Massive Price Hike?
Re: The real deal.
Which in my mind naturally translates to : we can now watch these movies whenever and on whatever we want.
So you just keep those classics locked up now - I'm sure it will be effective again sometime, soon, somewhere.. else else.
On the post: Copyright As Censorship: Newport Television Abusing DMCA To Try To Silence Criticism
Re: Re:
On the post: RIAA Wants To Put People In Jail For Sharing Their Music Subscription Login With Friends
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Can You Support An Entire Recording Industry By Shaking Down Music Fans?
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Why PROTECT IP Breaks The Internet
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: To save time and space let me repeat
On the post: Why PROTECT IP Breaks The Internet
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: This breaks nothing.
Let me be brief. No technologist with any will whatsoever will ever be affected by what you're supporting punctuation period
so yes, free as in dom as in no money due and so the more you take from me the less I care for you - tiddledee doo
On the post: Why PROTECT IP Breaks The Internet
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: This breaks nothing.
Let me be brief. No technologist with any will whatsoever will ever be affected by what you're supporting punctuation period
so yes, free as in dom as in no money due and so the more you take from me the less I care for you - tiddledee doo
On the post: Why PROTECT IP Breaks The Internet
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: This breaks nothing.
On the post: Why PROTECT IP Breaks The Internet
Re: Re: Re: This breaks nothing.
I think this is what gets me all riled up about the perception of prescriptive law supporting businesses that suck.. but I like this part - "PROTECT IP themselves"
Find your own effing crap and take care of it.. and if you can't then make more effing crap and take -> better
On the post: Senators Want To Put People In Jail For Embedding YouTube Videos
Re: Re: Re:
And for what? Money? Great. Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt is what your government is using to guide you dear fellow.
The Internet swells and raises the voices of the quiet. It's getting louder, incessant, it's threatening the corridors of power and soon more laws will not be enough.. or we will be made quiet.
So.. roll your eyes and drink your tea.
\r
On the post: Technology Trumps ICE Domain Seizures: Browser Plugin Fix Created In Just Days
Re: Hello!
Good on you.\r
On the post: Technology Trumps ICE Domain Seizures: Browser Plugin Fix Created In Just Days
Re: Re: Re: Circumvention Device
They changed (usurped) DNS entries. So what? This in no way shape or form denies entry to what was originally behind said changed DNS records. They've "prevented" nothing. You cannot circumvent a block when there is no block. It's really quite simple actually.
It might be like.. perhaps.. taping over the title of a book or perhaps changing the library's DD entry for the title but leaving it on the shelf - if you really wants it.. finds it.. Yeah, hide and seek.
However, I suspect your argument is not entirely off base consider ass munch lunacy these days - thus, I'd suspect, the tool is authored by "anonymous" - the law (ICE) would, truly, have a real live, life size whac-a-mole game.
So I say go it - challenge it - bring on censorship circumvention technological advances and enhancements - bitches and hoes knows.\r
On the post: Technology Trumps ICE Domain Seizures: Browser Plugin Fix Created In Just Days
Re: Re: Re: Circumvention Device
On the post: Band Complains About Massive Downloads Destroying Sales; Researchers Can't Find Any Downloads
?They're doing that thing
I think the manager is driving all the noise (http://www.camerontilburypublicity.com/ & https://www.facebook.com/pages/One-Soul-Thrust/142945022392876?sk=wall) and failing on a grand scale. I think it's really rather sad in a funny sort of way.
I think the manager should let the door hit him in the ass. I think dumb people are dumb. I don't think I want to listen. I've only just heard a Canadian artist and I don't want to ruin the taste in my mouth and *gasp* she even lets people hear her stuff *gasp* for free (http://www.reverbnation.com/hayleysales)! The shock, the awe - the absolute abomination that *is* the internet.
Eat it Mr. Cameron, cause you may go hungry for a bit.
On the post: Big Media To Innovative App Maker: Stop Innovating Without Our Permission!
Re: Re: Re:
Their choice was, in fact, the conduit. Once released upon the conduit you can crunch and scrunch any damn way you please. If they publish and allow public access they have granted irrevocable "rights" for any single thing that can sniff the wire, listen, read and paint.
done. game is over. no more dice. no two out of three. hasta.
\r
On the post: Boston College Tells Students That Using A Wireless Router Is A Sign Of Copyright Infringement
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
A router routes things behind it, yes? The crooks drove over that bridge there -> ! Who owns this bridge!? Patently ridiculous - much like the current business model.
\r
On the post: Homeland Security Says They Could Strip Search Every Airline Passenger If They Wanted To
Re: Re: Re:
No chance you could become a chuckle choker real quick like eh? A shame some are endowed with the ability to breath much less type.
Next >>