"And Obama actually had to shit on your shoe before you realized he was a fucking liar!!"
This is the part that ruffled your feathers. It does not state that Obama lies. Everyone lies, and often. It states he is a "liar" and by this I mean professionally.
"All the years of his constant bullshit just never added up before eh!"
This is the part you had difficulty understanding, or ignored, whatever.
Its not about the fact that Obama lies. As I said above, everyone lies about some things.
Its that Obama is a professional liar, paid to lie and does so every time he opens his mouth, for money.
It is this that I doubt that people understand, or will let themselves believe, no matter how often Obama "shits on their shoes".
On the other hand, "For the love of Mike" was a mistake on my part.
It was not intended to suggest a direct response to anyone named Mike, however, I can see how that might have been assumed by a reader. It is simply an expression used in place of "for the love of god", which is a term I dislike using.
"If someone says "look how blue the sky is" do you wonder why this is the first time they ever noticed the sky is blue?"
Call me thick, but could ye clarify that comment a tad. Not sure I'm getting what yer sending.
If someone says "look how blue the sky is", I usually look to see what shade of blue has captured that person's attention. I've seen dozens of shades of blue, dozens of shades of grey, and even a couple shades of yellow-green just before a big storm.
It would never occur to me to wonder why this is the first time they ever noticed the sky is blue.
If the sky was a particularly common shade of blue, I might wonder if the person looks at the sky very often, but I cannot even imagine anyone old enough to speak, who has never looked at the sky when it was blue.
Its probably just the shitty mood I'm in right now, but I'm afraid the comment just does not compute.
"Basically, the White House has now made it clear that for all its talk about respecting the constitution and civil liberties, when it comes time to actually show real leadership, it won't do it, and instead will back efforts that make a mockery of basic civil liberties."
For the Love of Mike!
And Obama actually had to shit on your shoe before you realized he was a fucking liar!! All the years of his constant bullshit just never added up before eh!
No wonder the powers that be have no respect for the public.
Its a brainless mob of day dreaming children, pretending that bad things only happen to bad people, while ignoring the daily bum-fuck they get from their Government.
"One of these days, it would be nice if Congress actually took real leadership and did what was right, rather than worrying how some abusive companies will react."
Well, as long as Trolls and other extortion racket enterprises can legally bribe greedy politicians to kill any real anti-extortion legislation, the chances of Congress "doing what is right" are absolutely non-existent - unless of course, you mean "doing what is right for congress-critters" to fulfill their yacht addiction.
I mean lets face it folks. Which would you choose?
Do the job the public thinks congress-critters are supposed to do and make copyright extortion illegal and aid innovation and save a lot of people a ton of cash, or....
Do what you actually joined congress for, and enjoy the wonders of a 100 foot yacht, with bikini-clad giggling bimbos and pounds of 80% pure cocaine, while counting the ever-growing bribery proceeds stashed away in your off shore accounts.
While almost nothing about what the American Spy Networks are doing to other countries is ever reported on TV, the news that the US is laying charges against Chinese hackers will be aired on every channel repeatedly for weeks.
The general US citizen will then see the NSA as the good guys catching Chinese bad guys, just the way the TV Spy shows have always depicted them. Most Americans still get their NEWS from TV.
If you gotta kill people for being anti-social, the very least you could do is anesthetize them, drain their blood for the blood bank while they are unconscious, so they pretty much die in their sleep, and then dissect them into parts usable by hospitals as organ and tissue transplants.
Cooking them or poisoning them is about as stupid as arresting and incarcerating folks for inhaling the smoke from burning plants.
It does seem that humans will always find the least effective and dumbest way to do almost anything.
GEM's Axiom: When it comes to human society, if something can be done in the worst way possible, it will be institutionalized as the right way to do it.
Well said. The damage done is global. A half century of international co-operation down the tubes, in one foul swoop. Certainly puts the idea of isolationism into simple perspective. Sadly, I suspect that this may have been intentional.
Isolated from the rest of the world by distrust, americans might become more amenable to the idea that all non-americans are the enemy of the USA, and thus must be spied upon relentlessly, at any cost (to US citizen's rights).
One other aspect of this is the reverse.
Other nations, allies included, will no longer feel any guilt about spying on the USA by any means possible and will in fact see it as being absolutely necessary.
A shitty situation, and we owe it all to the NSA and a couple generations of pussy presidents for hire.
I know you can read Pragmatic, so I assume that you chose that particular line in order to post your dislike of the idea of ending government, without actually stating your true feelings.
Perhaps you work in that industry, or earn an income because of it. Or maybe you just had a bad day. Just a guess.
First off, can you please point out where I said I "think that government alone is responsible for society's ills".
I actually stated that the fault was due entirely to those who have accumulated vast wealth and property and land and who tirelessly work to accumulate more of the same by any means possible. That these people form the membership of government is not a coincidence.
"Government's sole purpose is to make sure the populations they control, remain profitable to those who own property and land and need large numbers of desperate people to create the products and services that make the property, land and business owners wealthy. These very same property, land and business owners make up the ranks of the membership of government, and are thus working only for themselves."
It is through the institution of government that these people wreak havoc upon the earth in search of wealth.
Since you did not read it from my rant, I assume it was just a handy straw man created to carry the rest of your "amusing" post.
RE: "Fairly"
The example was that 1. were you to eliminate government. and 2. were you to divide the gained wealth normally absorbed and wasted by government among the population....
The resulting windfall would be so large as to make everyone on earth nearly a millionaire and go far towards quickly eliminating the numerous social and environmental crisis currently faced by the population, that were caused by the greed of our wealthiest brothers in their relentless search for greater and greater wealth.
"Fairly divided" was not even considered, as it was an exercise in mathematical quantity, not human morality.
The rest of your post is obviously based on your straw-man's burden, and makes absolutely no sense whatsoever otherwise.
And no, I have never knowingly met a Fox News viewer. Nor would I want to. I tend to avoid those who follow a leader.
"In the government's view, there is no need to ask whether the 2008 law violates Americans' privacy rights, because in this context Americans have no rights to be violated."
Cannot help but wonder if the old three-step dance applies to this situation as well. If so, and NSA can indeed spy on anyone within 3 steps of separation from the original callers involved in a overseas call, then this means that according to the internal policies of the NSA, Americans have no rights to be violated, period.
"It looks like we'll be forced to swallow the NSA's poison for a while yet."
Actually, according to the nature of such organizations, we will have to swallow their poison until they are forced to disband completely. They will never willingly stop using the tools they have discovered that make spying as easy as pie.
Even legislation that prohibits this type of activity will merely force the security industry to go underground and become more secretive, or shop out the process to other agencies that normally do not work that side of the street and will thus be unsuspected of doing so - for a time.
Considering how useless the Obama administration has proven itself to be in this matter (like so many others), it appears there is no-one in a position to control - let alone disband - this runaway security train.
I doubt also that even a candidate who successfully runs for POTUS, would, once in office, react any differently than Obama has. Its hard to fight against someone who has access to your deepest secrets and darkest deeds.
At least one segment of the population will be happy to hear this though. Organized Crime loves a pussy president.
Dunno. While I think anything that will counteract in any degree, the legalized corporate bribery that has become the political norm in America, I can't help but see this whole thing as confirmation that democracy is nothing more than money in action. That should be the description of capitalism, not democracy, but I guess it is the best description of Capitalist Democracy.
It tends to point out that beyond the lip-service about one-person one-vote, democracy American Style is nothing more than who "they who have the gold get to decide everything".
Regardless though, I'm very interested to see where this will lead. I sincerely hope it is not simply the beginning of the Politician's Best Gravy Train Ever.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why not use real vaccines?
News coverage would not be erroneously perceived by the public if it was not manipulated and falsified by official government decree before dissemination to the public, simply in order to protect the guilty parties from public scrutiny and disapproval.
"As Government Officials Continue To Shed Trustworthiness, Journalists Continue Placing More Trust In Government Officials"
If confused about why, I suggest examining exactly who owns the media outlets and thus pays the media journalists, or rather, does not pay them if they do not do as they are told.
Like the Federal Government that they "trust", the Truth-Free Press is a corporate owned entity. They are both owned by the same people who are about to make SOPA the law of the land.
What the hell did you expect? Honesty? Integrity? When did these things ever help purchase a yacht??
"Congress Continues To Pretend That SOPA Actually Is The Law."
Well, why not?
After all, come hell or high water, it WILL BE the law.
The powers-that-be demand it and that is all there is to it. It is now just up to the corporate minions called government, to get the job done.
What the US needs now is a big "disaster", or "war" to get the public looking "over there", so the boys can push all their pet laws into place quietly and I'm sure they're working diligently on that front.
But failing that, they will simply have to shove them down the public's throat, because these ownership society laws mean mega-bux to the top of the capital food chain and they will not allow the public to thwart their demands again.
"Yes, bin Laden was a very bad person, but was it worth bringing back a polio epidemic?"
errr.... just a reminder here. Bin Laden was not a "very bad person". He was a CIA asset, taking orders from Washington. The very bad deeds he did were in the line of duty to the American Government.
He did not get the "bad guy" label until after he refused to follow CIA orders. Then he became a scapegoat, but escaped.
In case you also forgot, the Bin Ladens were such good friends of the Bush family that George and the younger Bin Laden would often hold hands while walking. The Bin Ladens who were in America were escorted out of America by the Fed after 9/11, for their safety.
Amazing how quickly we forget the little details when in need of material to shore up the national fantasy.
They make ALL the rules and dole out ALL the punishments.
Everything that the federal employees are doing to stymie public access via FOIA to embarrassing documents, is in accordance with the rules and desires of the federal government and thus none of those employees are offending anyone but the public - an offense the fed deems both necessary and comical.
There is no punishment for obeying the rules of your employer when your employer is also in charge of punishment.
The Federal Government has unlimited funding, provided by you the taxpayers, and with this money they can do whatever they want because they are in charge of determining who has broken the law, who needs to obey the laws in the first place, and when a law needs to be altered in order to allow government more freedom of action - and they are in charge of altering any such laws too.
And once they've stopped working for the US Public, they can simply determine that they do NOT need to follow a law, by reinterpreting the meaning of any law they wish to circumvent, secretly.
You cannot force them to change, or to do the right thing because they are in charge of forcing people to change, or do the right thing. They can and do ignore the public's demands utterly and the public can do nothing about it.
You might note that the founding fathers mentioned that it is the duty of the people to occasionally overthrow a government that has become corrupt and unresponsive.
They did not state it was the duty of the people to convince the government to change because they understood that once a government takes the position of conqueror, it can no longer be controlled in any way by the public.
In such a situation, the public becomes the enemy of the state and the government becomes public enemy number one and only armed revolt can win the day - under normal circumstances.
Sadly, that is no longer a possibility and in fact, the federal government would very much love to have the American public take up arms against it.
They now possess the technology to suppress even a full national revolution, and would love nothing more than to get all the insurrectionists in front of their gun-sights at one time.
Talk about sending a message and saving a fortune on propaganda.
The only, and I do mean only possible chance the American Public has of taking back the reigns of power from the corporate and criminal hands that now wield it against them, is a national strike.
If you cannot hit their bosses in the pocketbook, you can have no effect at all on the corporate owned minions who hold public office in the federal government.
Sadly this is highly unlikely simply because Americans are the most divided people on earth, on just about every level and it is very improbable that they could come together to combat an outside force, such as a delinquent federal government.
In fact, it is unlikely they could come together long enough to agree on the construction of a paper airplane.
Yeah, I know its tiring to see the same damn statement made over and over again, but for some reason Americans are incredibly resistant to anything that runs contrary to their fantasy version of the world....
The US Federal Government no longer works for the American Public.
It takes your money and lives on your property, but it answers to other people now, most of which are not even American.
It does not really matter whether you believe this now or not, because very soon, once they get all their ducks in a row, they will inform you all that;
a.) you're now under house arrest and forbidden to travel without proper papers - (papers please)
b.) that you are all guilty of crimes against the state, until you can prove yourself innocent - (meaning you're all punishable unless you willingly become collaborators and squeal on your neighbors).
It amazes me no end how often and in how many places this scenario has been repeated here on earth, and it amazes me no end how often the people to who it happens, simply refuse to believe it can happen here until it is simply too late.
In fact, I'm not certain, but methinks that this scenario is universally identical every time and that in no place and at no time, has the soon to be conquered public become aware of the impending assault beforehand.
Obviously, the USA is no wiser than any of the preceding nations that failed to see the writing on the wall.
Well, they say you get the government you deserve.
Actually, Broken Old Bummer is none of those things.
He is simply the silver-tongued conman the Top500 Mafia-owned corporations hired to stand in front of the US Public and lie about whatever they tell him to lie about, and he's probably the best liar to ever sit in the Offal Office.
He's just doing a really difficult job for a really big pile of money. What could be more American than that?
On the post: As Feared: House Guts USA Freedom Act, Every Civil Liberties Organization Pulls Their Support
Gotcha.
"And Obama actually had to shit on your shoe before you realized he was a fucking liar!!"
This is the part that ruffled your feathers.
It does not state that Obama lies.
Everyone lies, and often.
It states he is a "liar" and by this I mean professionally.
"All the years of his constant bullshit just never added up before eh!"
This is the part you had difficulty understanding, or ignored, whatever.
Its not about the fact that Obama lies. As I said above, everyone lies about some things.
Its that Obama is a professional liar, paid to lie and does so every time he opens his mouth, for money.
It is this that I doubt that people understand, or will let themselves believe, no matter how often Obama "shits on their shoes".
On the other hand, "For the love of Mike" was a mistake on my part.
It was not intended to suggest a direct response to anyone named Mike, however, I can see how that might have been assumed by a reader. It is simply an expression used in place of "for the love of god", which is a term I dislike using.
---
On the post: As Feared: House Guts USA Freedom Act, Every Civil Liberties Organization Pulls Their Support
Re: Re:
Call me thick, but could ye clarify that comment a tad.
Not sure I'm getting what yer sending.
If someone says "look how blue the sky is", I usually look to see what shade of blue has captured that person's attention. I've seen dozens of shades of blue, dozens of shades of grey, and even a couple shades of yellow-green just before a big storm.
It would never occur to me to wonder why this is the first time they ever noticed the sky is blue.
If the sky was a particularly common shade of blue, I might wonder if the person looks at the sky very often, but I cannot even imagine anyone old enough to speak, who has never looked at the sky when it was blue.
Its probably just the shitty mood I'm in right now, but I'm afraid the comment just does not compute.
On the post: As Feared: House Guts USA Freedom Act, Every Civil Liberties Organization Pulls Their Support
For the Love of Mike!
And Obama actually had to shit on your shoe before you realized he was a fucking liar!! All the years of his constant bullshit just never added up before eh!
No wonder the powers that be have no respect for the public.
Its a brainless mob of day dreaming children, pretending that bad things only happen to bad people, while ignoring the daily bum-fuck they get from their Government.
I have to agree with the government on this.
The public truly deserves no respect at all.
---
On the post: Patent Reform Is Dead; Patent Trolls Win
The American Way
Well, as long as Trolls and other extortion racket enterprises can legally bribe greedy politicians to kill any real anti-extortion legislation, the chances of Congress "doing what is right" are absolutely non-existent - unless of course, you mean "doing what is right for congress-critters" to fulfill their yacht addiction.
I mean lets face it folks. Which would you choose?
Do the job the public thinks congress-critters are supposed to do and make copyright extortion illegal and aid innovation and save a lot of people a ton of cash, or....
Do what you actually joined congress for, and enjoy the wonders of a 100 foot yacht, with bikini-clad giggling bimbos and pounds of 80% pure cocaine, while counting the ever-growing bribery proceeds stashed away in your off shore accounts.
It is the American Way after all.
---
On the post: DOJ's Tone Deaf Criminal Charges Against Chinese Hackers Helps No One, Opens US Officials Up To Similar Charges
Fodder for the Truth-Free News Networks
While almost nothing about what the American Spy Networks are doing to other countries is ever reported on TV, the news that the US is laying charges against Chinese hackers will be aired on every channel repeatedly for weeks.
The general US citizen will then see the NSA as the good guys catching Chinese bad guys, just the way the TV Spy shows have always depicted them. Most Americans still get their NEWS from TV.
Its a propaganda win for the US Spy Teams.
On the post: Georgia To Protect Execution Pharmacists From Transparency So They Can Execute Disabled Man
1 dead bad guy saves 100 lives
Cooking them or poisoning them is about as stupid as arresting and incarcerating folks for inhaling the smoke from burning plants.
It does seem that humans will always find the least effective and dumbest way to do almost anything.
GEM's Axiom: When it comes to human society, if something can be done in the worst way possible, it will be institutionalized as the right way to do it.
On the post: Of Trust, The NSA, And Poisoning The Banquet
Re:
Isolated from the rest of the world by distrust, americans might become more amenable to the idea that all non-americans are the enemy of the USA, and thus must be spied upon relentlessly, at any cost (to US citizen's rights).
One other aspect of this is the reverse.
Other nations, allies included, will no longer feel any guilt about spying on the USA by any means possible and will in fact see it as being absolutely necessary.
A shitty situation, and we owe it all to the NSA and a couple generations of pussy presidents for hire.
On the post: UK Parliament Finally Admits That Snowden Revelations Reveal That GCHQ Oversight Is Broken
Re: Re: Rant No. 37723
Perhaps you work in that industry, or earn an income because of it. Or maybe you just had a bad day. Just a guess.
First off, can you please point out where I said I "think that government alone is responsible for society's ills".
I actually stated that the fault was due entirely to those who have accumulated vast wealth and property and land and who tirelessly work to accumulate more of the same by any means possible. That these people form the membership of government is not a coincidence.
"Government's sole purpose is to make sure the populations they control, remain profitable to those who own property and land and need large numbers of desperate people to create the products and services that make the property, land and business owners wealthy. These very same property, land and business owners make up the ranks of the membership of government, and are thus working only for themselves."
It is through the institution of government that these people wreak havoc upon the earth in search of wealth.
Since you did not read it from my rant, I assume it was just a handy straw man created to carry the rest of your "amusing" post.
RE: "Fairly"
The example was that 1. were you to eliminate government.
and 2. were you to divide the gained wealth normally absorbed and wasted by government among the population....
The resulting windfall would be so large as to make everyone on earth nearly a millionaire and go far towards quickly eliminating the numerous social and environmental crisis currently faced by the population, that were caused by the greed of our wealthiest brothers in their relentless search for greater and greater wealth.
"Fairly divided" was not even considered, as it was an exercise in mathematical quantity, not human morality.
The rest of your post is obviously based on your straw-man's burden, and makes absolutely no sense whatsoever otherwise.
And no, I have never knowingly met a Fox News viewer. Nor would I want to. I tend to avoid those who follow a leader.
On the post: DOJ Says Americans Have No 4th Amendment Protections At All When They Communicate With Foreigners
Constitutional toilet paper
Cannot help but wonder if the old three-step dance applies to this situation as well. If so, and NSA can indeed spy on anyone within 3 steps of separation from the original callers involved in a overseas call, then this means that according to the internal policies of the NSA, Americans have no rights to be violated, period.
On the post: Of Trust, The NSA, And Poisoning The Banquet
Organized Crime loves a pussy president.
Actually, according to the nature of such organizations, we will have to swallow their poison until they are forced to disband completely. They will never willingly stop using the tools they have discovered that make spying as easy as pie.
Even legislation that prohibits this type of activity will merely force the security industry to go underground and become more secretive, or shop out the process to other agencies that normally do not work that side of the street and will thus be unsuspected of doing so - for a time.
Considering how useless the Obama administration has proven itself to be in this matter (like so many others), it appears there is no-one in a position to control - let alone disband - this runaway security train.
I doubt also that even a candidate who successfully runs for POTUS, would, once in office, react any differently than Obama has. Its hard to fight against someone who has access to your deepest secrets and darkest deeds.
At least one segment of the population will be happy to hear this though. Organized Crime loves a pussy president.
On the post: Lessig's Anti-SuperPAC SuperPAC Raises First $1 Million In Just 12 Days
Capitalist Democracy is Oxymoron
It tends to point out that beyond the lip-service about one-person one-vote, democracy American Style is nothing more than who "they who have the gold get to decide everything".
Regardless though, I'm very interested to see where this will lead. I sincerely hope it is not simply the beginning of the Politician's Best Gravy Train Ever.
On the post: You Can Thank The CIA For The Return Of Polio, Even Though The Media Conveniently Ignores This
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why not use real vaccines?
On the post: Over 100 Internet Companies Call On FCC To Protect The Open Internet
Re:
Shinola - that's brown shoe polish for all you youngin's out there.
On the post: As Government Officials Continue To Shed Trustworthiness, Journalists Continue Placing More Trust In Government Officials
silly humans
If confused about why, I suggest examining exactly who owns the media outlets and thus pays the media journalists, or rather, does not pay them if they do not do as they are told.
Like the Federal Government that they "trust", the Truth-Free Press is a corporate owned entity. They are both owned by the same people who are about to make SOPA the law of the land.
What the hell did you expect?
Honesty?
Integrity?
When did these things ever help purchase a yacht??
On the post: Congress Continues To Pretend That SOPA Actually Is The Law
What will be will be...
Well, why not?
After all, come hell or high water, it WILL BE the law.
The powers-that-be demand it and that is all there is to it.
It is now just up to the corporate minions called government, to get the job done.
What the US needs now is a big "disaster", or "war" to get the public looking "over there", so the boys can push all their pet laws into place quietly and I'm sure they're working diligently on that front.
But failing that, they will simply have to shove them down the public's throat, because these ownership society laws mean mega-bux to the top of the capital food chain and they will not allow the public to thwart their demands again.
-
On the post: You Can Thank The CIA For The Return Of Polio, Even Though The Media Conveniently Ignores This
bad bad boy
errr.... just a reminder here.
Bin Laden was not a "very bad person".
He was a CIA asset, taking orders from Washington.
The very bad deeds he did were in the line of duty to the American Government.
He did not get the "bad guy" label until after he refused to follow CIA orders. Then he became a scapegoat, but escaped.
In case you also forgot, the Bin Ladens were such good friends of the Bush family that George and the younger Bin Laden would often hold hands while walking. The Bin Ladens who were in America were escorted out of America by the Fed after 9/11, for their safety.
Amazing how quickly we forget the little details when in need of material to shore up the national fantasy.
On the post: The Government's Antipathy Towards Transparency Has Made FOIA Lawsuits The Default Process
Re: We do have the power
Vote to your hearts content, it will change nothing.
If the vote was an effective way to eliminate corruption in government it would be made illegal. Instead, they simply made it useless.
A placebo.
On the post: The Government's Antipathy Towards Transparency Has Made FOIA Lawsuits The Default Process
Let's make a paper airplane...
Its THE Federal Government we're discussing here.
They make ALL the rules and dole out ALL the punishments.
Everything that the federal employees are doing to stymie public access via FOIA to embarrassing documents, is in accordance with the rules and desires of the federal government and thus none of those employees are offending anyone but the public - an offense the fed deems both necessary and comical.
There is no punishment for obeying the rules of your employer when your employer is also in charge of punishment.
The Federal Government has unlimited funding, provided by you the taxpayers, and with this money they can do whatever they want because they are in charge of determining who has broken the law, who needs to obey the laws in the first place, and when a law needs to be altered in order to allow government more freedom of action - and they are in charge of altering any such laws too.
And once they've stopped working for the US Public, they can simply determine that they do NOT need to follow a law, by reinterpreting the meaning of any law they wish to circumvent, secretly.
You cannot force them to change, or to do the right thing because they are in charge of forcing people to change, or do the right thing. They can and do ignore the public's demands utterly and the public can do nothing about it.
You might note that the founding fathers mentioned that it is the duty of the people to occasionally overthrow a government that has become corrupt and unresponsive.
They did not state it was the duty of the people to convince the government to change because they understood that once a government takes the position of conqueror, it can no longer be controlled in any way by the public.
In such a situation, the public becomes the enemy of the state and the government becomes public enemy number one and only armed revolt can win the day - under normal circumstances.
Sadly, that is no longer a possibility and in fact, the federal government would very much love to have the American public take up arms against it.
They now possess the technology to suppress even a full national revolution, and would love nothing more than to get all the insurrectionists in front of their gun-sights at one time.
Talk about sending a message and saving a fortune on propaganda.
The only, and I do mean only possible chance the American Public has of taking back the reigns of power from the corporate and criminal hands that now wield it against them, is a national strike.
If you cannot hit their bosses in the pocketbook, you can have no effect at all on the corporate owned minions who hold public office in the federal government.
Sadly this is highly unlikely simply because Americans are the most divided people on earth, on just about every level and it is very improbable that they could come together to combat an outside force, such as a delinquent federal government.
In fact, it is unlikely they could come together long enough to agree on the construction of a paper airplane.
On the post: The Government's Antipathy Towards Transparency Has Made FOIA Lawsuits The Default Process
...and one more time....
The US Federal Government no longer works for the American Public.
It takes your money and lives on your property, but it answers to other people now, most of which are not even American.
It does not really matter whether you believe this now or not, because very soon, once they get all their ducks in a row, they will inform you all that;
a.) you're now under house arrest and forbidden to travel without proper papers - (papers please)
b.) that you are all guilty of crimes against the state, until you can prove yourself innocent - (meaning you're all punishable unless you willingly become collaborators and squeal on your neighbors).
It amazes me no end how often and in how many places this scenario has been repeated here on earth, and it amazes me no end how often the people to who it happens, simply refuse to believe it can happen here until it is simply too late.
In fact, I'm not certain, but methinks that this scenario is universally identical every time and that in no place and at no time, has the soon to be conquered public become aware of the impending assault beforehand.
Obviously, the USA is no wiser than any of the preceding nations that failed to see the writing on the wall.
Well, they say you get the government you deserve.
-
On the post: US Government Begins Rollout Of Its 'Driver's License For The Internet'
Re: Re:
He is simply the silver-tongued conman the Top500 Mafia-owned corporations hired to stand in front of the US Public and lie about whatever they tell him to lie about, and he's probably the best liar to ever sit in the Offal Office.
He's just doing a really difficult job for a really big pile of money. What could be more American than that?
Next >>