DOJ's Tone Deaf Criminal Charges Against Chinese Hackers Helps No One, Opens US Officials Up To Similar Charges
from the what-is-the-point? dept
We already wrote about the DOJ's "ironic" decision to file criminal charges against Chinese hackers. Soon after that the actual indictment was released and it's more or less what you'd expect. While the DOJ's extremely smug announcement about the indictment made it sound like it would amaze the public, the reality is that it just describes some fairly standard spearfishing attempts to seek out information from some big American companies. It's clearly illegal, but it really doesn't seem that impressive, especially given everything that's been revealed about the kind of attacks the NSA pulls off.And, in fact, people are already pointing out that by firing the opening shot with criminal charges, the DOJ may be opening the floodgates against the NSA, FBI and others for similar charges in other countries. Obviously, China will almost certainly hit back with charges -- possibly even trying to arrest some folks in that country. But the ridiculousness of the situation may also lead other countries to levy charges against specific individuals within US intelligence -- thereby making life a lot more difficult for US intelligence officials in the near future.
So, the downside to this indictment seems fairly high. And for what upside? It's difficult to see any real upside. The US is clearly never going to get its hands on the specific individuals named in the indictment. China certainly isn't going to hand them over. And for all of the DOJ's bluster about finally having "proof" of criminal activity, no one is that interested. Everyone already knew the People's Liberation Army did this kind of hacking. Instead, the only real impact of this indictment seems to be the backlash, as people compare it to the lengths that US intelligence has gone to to spy on the rest of the world (including the Chinese).
In the end, the whole thing seems incredibly tone deaf on multiple levels. It calls more attention to questionable US activities, opens up US intelligence employees to criminal charges around the world, and does nothing to harm the Chinese. Doesn't anyone at the DOJ think these things through?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: china, doj, eric holder, hacking, indictment, nsa, surveillance
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
There's a saying for this...
Really, if they were trying to defend their own spying by pulling the 'But he was doing it too!', they really should have thought that one through a bit more.
'Chinese hackers are engaged in industrial spying efforts' might sound bad on it's own, but compared to what the NSA has been doing, it's not even remotely as damaging, and I imagine most will see this as nothing more than a desperate attempt to shift attention away from the USG sanctioned spying that it is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Do you want International Incidents?
Incidentally, I wonder if the Chinese are going to indict Mike Rogers or Dianne Feinstein over this?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Do you want International Incidents?
In addition, consider the possibilities of US soldiers currently in Afghanistan being indicted for stray shots, which, under this new legal paradigm, could be construed as assassination attempts.
Good job, NSA! Not only have you made the Internet less secure for everyone, you've made reality less secure for everyone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That would be fun to watch.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DOJ = DOS(tupidity)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Not trusting the info I went to the source, the FBI computer Most Wanted.
Not only did they file charges against Chinese Intelligence Officers but they also files charges against Pakistan and Latvia [most like Russian] Intelligence Officials.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We have political criminals running our country. Criminals that have violated the Constitution in their efforts to gain ever more power. This is not to mention the violation of their oaths of office.
This is not going to be good. With their lack of foresight, China is subject to cash in all those government bonds they hold. Doing so would bankrupt the US officially as it already is unofficially.
I am not very proud of what my government is doing in my name. In fact, I'm ashamed of it. It is not the country I put my ass on the line for in the military. I don't even recognize it from it's actions as being the same country.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But thinking is for criminals.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That'd be interesting sight...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
... Really?
Never go full retard...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It really mystifies me too...
And otherwise, the NSA has proven to be as agressive (if not moreso) then the Chinese. After all, the NSA doesn't bother spearphishing once they started weaponizing the Internet backbone...
So how are any high-up officials in the intelligence community ever going to visit, say, Brazil, which now knows that Petrobras was hacked by the NSA to gain information to the US's advantage? Or any DEA official in the Bahamas, now that its been revealed that the NSA, with DEA help, executed full-take of all cellphone calls?
I think the reason for it is willful ignorance. The one group most ignorant of the NSA's activities is the US government itself: Because all the snowden slides are still classified, and reports often include the slides themselves, they are like a bunch of kids going "nah nah nah we aren't listening".
Thus as a result they make stupid decisions, like starting a "arrest for hacking" legal war with the rest of the world, and are going to be facing a world of grief once everyone else goes 'hey, if the US does it to NATO allies, we can do it to them..."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It really mystifies me too...
“With Spy Charges, U.S. Draws a Line That Few Others Recognize” by David Sangermay, New York Times, May 19, 2014
The District of Columbia —inside the beltway— has it's own particular brand of insanity. No one else can quite figure out a world where the economy is not a cornerstone of national security.
I mean, that one's hard for folks on Wall Street to figure out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It really mystifies me too...
Nigel
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Here's why
The government has their headline which is about as far as any of the aformentioned will read. They will then go about their daily routine believing that we're fighting the good fight against those chinese devils. And if they strike up a conversation with someone somewhere it may come up, and both participants can nod sagely about how those Chinese are stealing all our secrets but everything is now jake because Holder has their number and you don't mess with the US.
The whole thing is nothing more than theatrical a dog and pony show, and while it may seem tone-deaf to those in the know, it is actually working as designed and intended.
So the next time you interact with one of your clueless parents, family members, or gym acquaitenances, just stop and think for a minute about how manipulated and ignorant they truly are, then realize that the government has them right where they want them with headlines like these. It's an eye opening experience.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Here's why
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Here's why
“Why Did the US Indict PLA Officers for Hacking, Economic Espionage?”, by Ankit Panda, The Diplomat, May 21, 2014
Almost every observer agrees that indictment is meant, as prosecutors do so often like to say, “to send a message.”
Observers disagree on whom exactly the message is meant for. Many recent articles have taken the intended recipients to be the Chinese government. The idea that the message is meant primarily for domestic consumption is a minority view, but does have respectable subscription.
Almost no one believes the message was intended for, say, European consumption.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Here's why
Wrong. There are many target audiences of this propaganda campaign, whose timing might suggest an attempt to divert attention away from the US government's illegal spying on "our" European allies, in this case by creating an even worse villain .. or at least trying to.
Next up, expect some new charges to emerge about spying/hacking by Russia. ... Or maybe even India ... or whichever country needs to be branded as a bad guy at the time. Anything to desperately divert attention away from the NSA's own spying as part of their pathetic "Hey, look over there!" defense strategy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Here's why
Oh? Would you please point me to stories in the German-language press that conclude, in substance, “The Obama administration's indictment of the Chinese state hackers is primarily intended to send an emphatic message to the French.”
I'd be curious about any stories like that. Intensely curious.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The only real answer
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just wait until they find those router hackers...
What would Clapper do if a Chinese strike team showed up at his door, bagged him, and got him off shore to the Chinese mainland.
The US has opened the door to all sorts of Tom Clancy styled story lines here. Some may actually happen.
Time for popcorn.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the real reason
Because of the US pressuring EU countries into cutting off trade to Russia, Russia's only way out was to create a trading block with China, and there's no doubt that China knew Russia's desperation and drove a hard bargain.
Because China thumbed its nose at US strategic interests and instead took advantage of the US-engineered trade war that had Russia boxed into a corner, China had to get a spanking. But since the real reason for China's spanking -- trade with Russia -- is hard to justify, another reason had to be found.
So then it becomes time to dredge up years-old accusations, dust them off, spit-polish them, and serve them up as something new. Chinese hacking accusations were the ideal choice because they serve as a shield to blunt the sting of international anger against the NSA's own egregious behavior.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
you expect intelligence from eric holder ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And they claim that Snowden endangered the lives and operations of US personnel working to keep the nation secure? WTF, are you thinking DOJ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
State department daily press briefing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: State department daily press briefing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fodder for the Truth-Free News Networks
While almost nothing about what the American Spy Networks are doing to other countries is ever reported on TV, the news that the US is laying charges against Chinese hackers will be aired on every channel repeatedly for weeks.
The general US citizen will then see the NSA as the good guys catching Chinese bad guys, just the way the TV Spy shows have always depicted them. Most Americans still get their NEWS from TV.
Its a propaganda win for the US Spy Teams.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]