Every Republican bill does the opposite of its name/description.
CONNECT act: prevents network competition
Online freedom and Viewpoint Diversity act: sets up a censorship regime against non-far-right speech
BAD ADS act: uses online advertising as a backdoor to set up a censorship regime against non-far-right speech
Limiting Section 230 to Good Samaritans act: sets up a censorship regime against non-far-right speech
Trump's "Preventing Online Censorship" executive order: sets up a censorship regime against non-far-right speech
Ending Support for Online Censorship act: sets up a censorship regime against non-far-right speech
Ending Abuse and Rampant Neglect of Internet Technologies (EARN IT) act: use false narratives about online child porn to backdoor encryption, privacy, and free speech all at once
Restoring Internet Freedom order: for the first time ever gives internet companies the unregulated freedom to defraud and cripple service to customers in any way they can dream up.
Defense of Marriage Act: attacks certain marriages by preventing them from being properly recognized
Re: Maybe the link and snippet tax was a red herring.
It's the opposite. The existence of the internet broke Newspapers' cornering of the ad market, and instead of innovating to fit into the new reality, they're want their old, failing structure to be subsidized.
Google and Facebook are in no way responsible for this; they're targeted solely because they're rich.
If you leave out the parts where the video was the product of Veritas-level editing in order to make apoear like more than it was in addition to Assange's lies about its content.
On the post: Facebook's Australian News Ban Did Demonstrate The Evil Of Zero Rating
Re:
What made you believe the rest of us care what a moronic sheep has been deluded into believing?
On the post: Karma: Twitch Replaces Live Metallica Concert With 8-Bit Music To Avoid Copyright Madness
On Amazon, Metalica's still being assholes, only allowing entire albums to be bought rather than single tracks like most.
On the post: Civil Rights Groups Argue That Biden Should Drop Assange Prosecution; Noting That It Is An Attack On Journalism
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Sorry
Put the goalposts back. You're supposed to be better than that.
On the post: The Bizarre Reaction To Facebook's Decision To Get Out Of The News Business In Australia
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Perhaps since every right-winger's accusation is a confession, they're just always deciding to take the fifth?
On the post: Reminder: Just A Few Days Left Before Our '230 Matters' Conversation With Section 230 Authors Ron Wyden & Chris Cox
Remind them to mention that far from overturning liability norms, that the intent of 230 was preventing prodigy from creating bad new precedent .
And another round of debunking the "moderation/promotion makes (or should make) you a publisher" lie would not be remiss.
On the post: Conservative News Outlet Ordered To Pay More Than $250,000 In Legal Fees To Rachel Maddow, MSNBC
Re: The Kremlin Blues
Yes, restless94110 is the kind of simpleton who would claim Sputnik is merely "financed" by the Russian government.
On the post: New Bill Tries To Ban Community Broadband. During A Pandemic.
Re: GOP Doublespeak
Every Republican bill does the opposite of its name/description.
CONNECT act: prevents network competition
Online freedom and Viewpoint Diversity act: sets up a censorship regime against non-far-right speech
BAD ADS act: uses online advertising as a backdoor to set up a censorship regime against non-far-right speech
Limiting Section 230 to Good Samaritans act: sets up a censorship regime against non-far-right speech
Trump's "Preventing Online Censorship" executive order: sets up a censorship regime against non-far-right speech
Ending Support for Online Censorship act: sets up a censorship regime against non-far-right speech
Ending Abuse and Rampant Neglect of Internet Technologies (EARN IT) act: use false narratives about online child porn to backdoor encryption, privacy, and free speech all at once
Restoring Internet Freedom order: for the first time ever gives internet companies the unregulated freedom to defraud and cripple service to customers in any way they can dream up.
Defense of Marriage Act: attacks certain marriages by preventing them from being properly recognized
On the post: The Bizarre Reaction To Facebook's Decision To Get Out Of The News Business In Australia
Re: Maybe the link and snippet tax was a red herring.
It's the opposite. The existence of the internet broke Newspapers' cornering of the ad market, and instead of innovating to fit into the new reality, they're want their old, failing structure to be subsidized.
Google and Facebook are in no way responsible for this; they're targeted solely because they're rich.
On the post: Peloton Seeks To Invalidate 'Spinning' Trademark Held By Trademark Bully
Re:
[Projects facts not in evidence]
On the post: A 90 Year Old Shouldn't Have To Buy A $10,000 Ad Just To Get AT&T To Upgrade His Shitty DSL Line
Does "Start date: Feb 31" count as "planned?"
On the post: Parler's Found A New Host (And A New CEO)... For Now
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
That you fascists hate "we don't want to be associated with assholes" doesn't stop it from being free speech.
On the post: Parler's Found A New Host (And A New CEO)... For Now
Re: Re:
The opposite of can't-sell culture.
On the post: Civil Rights Groups Argue That Biden Should Drop Assange Prosecution; Noting That It Is An Attack On Journalism
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Sorry
Not on one immune to facts as yourself, no. But perhaps to one less gullible.
On the post: Civil Rights Groups Argue That Biden Should Drop Assange Prosecution; Noting That It Is An Attack On Journalism
Re: Re: Re: Re: Sorry
Sorry about deflating your bad-faith whataboutism like that.
On the post: Civil Rights Groups Argue That Biden Should Drop Assange Prosecution; Noting That It Is An Attack On Journalism
Re: Re: Re: Re: Sorry
If you leave out the parts where the video was the product of Veritas-level editing in order to make apoear like more than it was in addition to Assange's lies about its content.
On the post: Civil Rights Groups Argue That Biden Should Drop Assange Prosecution; Noting That It Is An Attack On Journalism
Re: Re: Sorry
No, he's talking about what happened in the real world.
On the post: Civil Rights Groups Argue That Biden Should Drop Assange Prosecution; Noting That It Is An Attack On Journalism
Re:
Or how about to helping someone bypass access controls to reach what they're not authorized to.
On the post: The Copia Institute To The Oversight Board Regarding Facebook's Trump Suspension: There Was No Wrong Decision
Re: I'll take why Section 230 is under attack for $1000
Is that why you hate them so much?
On the post: Annoyance Builds At Elon Musk Getting A Billion In Subsidies For Starlink Broadband
The more desperately the incumbents screech, the better Starlink must be.
On the post: Ajit Pai Tried To Strangle A Broadband Aid Program For Low Income Americans. Then A Pandemic Hit.
Re: Repubs want inefficiency and fraud
Republicans campaign on "government doesn't work" but that's only true where they hold office.
Next >>