The fact that it's Trump that handed America's dominance over to China notwitstanding, it's funny you sheep say "Biden protects real rights and freedoms but not fake ones" as though that were a bad thing.
Last time he made these threats, he tipped his hand too far.
He implicitly admitted that as much he tries to bluff, his hand isn't a royal flush, but a handful of Monopoly cards. Which is why he keeps folding to you.
To distract from the fact his terrorist comrades blugeoned "Lovely, humble soul" dachsund-rescuing veteran and patriot Brian Sicknick to death with a fire extinguisher because he bravely stood up for freedom against fascist tyrrany?
Someone rational would jave.veen avle to figure out that "Objectively better than the absolute worst outcome" doesn't mean "what we want to see."
Absolute worst outcome:
The terrorists were allowed to achieve their goal of destroying America.
Better-than-worst outcome:
The terrorists are stopped dead or arrested before completing their aims.
Better outcome:
The terrorists stayed frothing in their basements.
Best outcome (what I, for one actually wanted to see):
The terrorists were never radicalized by anti-American propaganda lies (like "Leftists want to kill you for differing opinions") in the first place.
Reality:
Stop radicalized America-hating terrorists in the from completing their act of a muderously violent attack against America's freedom from tyrrany.
Not-a-scintilla-of-basis-in-reality:
Kill all white women for "thoughtcrime."
So in your illiterate pixie-dust world, Darwin Award winners are all guilty of "genocide," for their act of cleaning the gene pool to the same extent as what the original comenter actually suggested - that only those taking the suicidally stupid action of participating in an anti-American kill squad shouldn't have been aided in reaching their targets.
Because notice how the only thing remotely defamatory on Techdirt is Jhon's knowingly and intentionally making these false lawyer-conspiracy claims and accusations against Mike.
Notice how literate posters, Paul for one, was able to clearly able to see the facts Woody lies aren't in evidence.
Mainly, that nowhere does Woody's invented strawman of "shooting people whose politics you disagree with" appear in BG's comment in even the most tangential way.
Claiming to have read "X", but saying it contained "Blurple" is textbook lack of reading comprehension.
But that's just a symptom of Woody's lack of comprehension in general. Like many trolls, when his bullshit is called out, his narcissism tells him that his critics' success isn't because they are the ones with factual merit, but only because they used magic words. But when he turns around and tries to use the accusations, that only were true against him, in inaplicable situations his false attacks fall flat. Thus he spins up fantastical conspiracy theories to convince himself that treating two opposing situations differently is hypocrisy.
On the post: Dominion Sues Rudy Giuliani For $1.3 Billion Over False Statements About Its Voting Systems
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Personally, I think election fraud _is_
Sites that support right-wing narratives
You can only pick one.
On the post: Content Moderation Case Study: Twitter Removes Account Of Human Rights Activist (2018)
Re: Re: Re:
And it turns out many of these anti-American shitwits didn't even bother voting in the election in the first place.
On the post: Google Threatens To Pull Out Of Australia Entirely; Australians Demand That It Both Stay And Pay News Orgs For Giving Them Traffic
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
The fact that it's Trump that handed America's dominance over to China notwitstanding, it's funny you sheep say "Biden protects real rights and freedoms but not fake ones" as though that were a bad thing.
On the post: RIAA Launches Brand New Front Group Pretending To Represent Independent Artists
Re:
Last time he made these threats, he tipped his hand too far.
He implicitly admitted that as much he tries to bluff, his hand isn't a royal flush, but a handful of Monopoly cards. Which is why he keeps folding to you.
On the post: RIAA Launches Brand New Front Group Pretending To Represent Independent Artists
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
If so, their circular file must be overflowing.
On the post: Parole Violator Who Raided Senate Building Sold Out By The GPS Unit Attached To Him For Previous Parole Violations
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
To distract from the fact his terrorist comrades blugeoned "Lovely, humble soul" dachsund-rescuing veteran and patriot Brian Sicknick to death with a fire extinguisher because he bravely stood up for freedom against fascist tyrrany?
On the post: Parole Violator Who Raided Senate Building Sold Out By The GPS Unit Attached To Him For Previous Parole Violations
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Someone rational would jave.veen avle to figure out that "Objectively better than the absolute worst outcome" doesn't mean "what we want to see."
Absolute worst outcome:
The terrorists were allowed to achieve their goal of destroying America.
Better-than-worst outcome:
The terrorists are stopped dead or arrested before completing their aims.
Better outcome:
The terrorists stayed frothing in their basements.
Best outcome (what I, for one actually wanted to see):
The terrorists were never radicalized by anti-American propaganda lies (like "Leftists want to kill you for differing opinions") in the first place.
On the post: No, Getting Rid Of Anonymity Will Not Fix Social Media; It Will Cause More Problems
Re: "Hold accountable"
Then why spend your time making up dumb definitions out of thin air like that?
On the post: Parole Violator Who Raided Senate Building Sold Out By The GPS Unit Attached To Him For Previous Parole Violations
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Too Long; can't read:
Reality:
Stop radicalized America-hating terrorists in the from completing their act of a muderously violent attack against America's freedom from tyrrany.
Not-a-scintilla-of-basis-in-reality:
Kill all white women for "thoughtcrime."
On the post: Parole Violator Who Raided Senate Building Sold Out By The GPS Unit Attached To Him For Previous Parole Violations
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
So in your illiterate pixie-dust world, Darwin Award winners are all guilty of "genocide," for their act of cleaning the gene pool to the same extent as what the original comenter actually suggested - that only those taking the suicidally stupid action of participating in an anti-American kill squad shouldn't have been aided in reaching their targets.
On the post: No, Revoking Section 230 Would Not 'Save Democracy'
Re: Re: More of the same
Your arguments prove otherwise.
On the post: No, Revoking Section 230 Would Not 'Save Democracy'
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Reworking Section 230
[Projects facts not in evidence]
Because notice how the only thing remotely defamatory on Techdirt is Jhon's knowingly and intentionally making these false lawyer-conspiracy claims and accusations against Mike.
On the post: How Can Conservatives Fight Back Against Big Tech? For A Start, Just Be Sane Again.
The first time you ever show any, we'll let you know.
On the post: Parole Violator Who Raided Senate Building Sold Out By The GPS Unit Attached To Him For Previous Parole Violations
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Notice how literate posters, Paul for one, was able to clearly able to see the facts Woody lies aren't in evidence.
Mainly, that nowhere does Woody's invented strawman of "shooting people whose politics you disagree with" appear in BG's comment in even the most tangential way.
Claiming to have read "X", but saying it contained "Blurple" is textbook lack of reading comprehension.
But that's just a symptom of Woody's lack of comprehension in general. Like many trolls, when his bullshit is called out, his narcissism tells him that his critics' success isn't because they are the ones with factual merit, but only because they used magic words. But when he turns around and tries to use the accusations, that only were true against him, in inaplicable situations his false attacks fall flat. Thus he spins up fantastical conspiracy theories to convince himself that treating two opposing situations differently is hypocrisy.
On the post: No, Revoking Section 230 Would Not 'Save Democracy'
Re: Sec. 230
Or how about not coming up with moronic end-runs around due process and justice?
On the post: No, Revoking Section 230 Would Not 'Save Democracy'
Re: Reworking Section 230
Only if you accept the false premise that any changes to 230 are needed.
On the post: Content Moderation Case Study: Twitter Removes Account Of Human Rights Activist (2018)
Re: Re:
[Asserts facts only true of Parler.]
On the post: How Can Conservatives Fight Back Against Big Tech? For A Start, Just Be Sane Again.
Re: Re:
[Projects facts not in evidence]
On the post: How Can Conservatives Fight Back Against Big Tech? For A Start, Just Be Sane Again.
Re:
Therefore, by your own definition, there's no first-amendment violation happening.
On the post: Parole Violator Who Raided Senate Building Sold Out By The GPS Unit Attached To Him For Previous Parole Violations
Re: Re: Re:
Why are you so desperate to keep proving that you're illiterate?
Next >>