The NYT may have the right to lie and hide facts. Just like Fox and myriad others. But the warmongering that went on between the NYT and the Iraqi's, buying the adminstration's Iraqi lies. The NYT's willingness to hide Bush's use of torture and mass surveillance for a year because it might affect the 2004 election (especially after Comey). And other atrocities should forever bar the NYT from rising above green alien invasion stories in the subtabloids.
No American deserves a politician. Their clothes and assets should be stripped from them on entry into a political house, and not returned until the term is over. No more, no less, than when they entered.
The Supremes said that the police were free to make up fairy stories as though they were law, no matter now inane it was. It is up to the courts to turn those tales into law.
Again, this is obviously analogy and sarcasm. And if it weren't there would be no immediacy of action. You would leave us a far poorer nation than we already are.
Sex, drugs and R&R always make good stories for the evening news. Doesn't matter if their net effect is negative, or they are as ridiculous as the Jenkem hoax. Lawmakers, prosecutors and LEOs will be there attempting to glory in the news coverage. They should bask in Jenkem.
Doesn't matter what he believes. The issue is whether or not his tweets violated the law. To do so:
They would have had to have been believable. The immediacy of the stirrings of emotion would have provoked a reasonable person to instantaneous violence.
And likely other conditions. A tweet is not going to fall into that category.
But then who cares about the Constitution until their rights are violated.
Unlikely to be the direct result of Mental Health Industry recommendations, but rather abuse of existing law just as the Soviets used to back in the "good old days."
The NYPD has even taken to using this technique on its own members when they insist that the orders of Federal Judges be followed.
It is certainly an arrest within the meaning of the word. Force, or the threat of force was used to move a man from one location to another. The police better hope it was an arrest, otherwise it would be unlawful imprisonment if the man was kept for less than 24 hours, kidnapping if longer.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And is that the standard for not facing prosecution now?
There is a bit of difference between rape and hacking. I assume that anywhere that I can get on the net is a legal place to be. Not unlike taking a photograph from a sidewalk.
After all, this is the definition that the FBI uses. How can we treat a human more harshly?
Sheriff Dart surrendered many of his Constitutional rights when he willingly accepted the office of Sheriff. Using the power of his office in this manner is one of them.
To reply is one thing. To invade is another. Violating Constitutional rights is a tremendously serious step, which may only be taken under the most exigent of circumstances. Particularly that of a forced entry into a person's home. Especially when there was no evidence that a crime was committed or about to be committed. Except of course by the police. Their punishments should have been for solid felonies for home invasion and terrorism, not a mere civil judgment.
Have you never heard of swatting? It is simply justified homicide to the DA. And responses like yours help to perpetuate such actions.
I seem to recall that AT&T has been selling mass data collection since 1987. Both parties have had more than 30 years to put an end to this practice, but they have only stimulated its growth.
On the post: President Obama Claims He Cannot Pardon Snowden; He's Wrong
Re: Positive Aspects of Obama's Legacy
On the post: President Obama Claims He Cannot Pardon Snowden; He's Wrong
Re: Re: Barack Obama is a compulsive liar...
On the post: President Obama Claims He Cannot Pardon Snowden; He's Wrong
Re: Re:
On the post: Trump's Constant Whining About The NY Times Isn't Just Bad For The First Amendment
No American deserves a politician. Their clothes and assets should be stripped from them on entry into a political house, and not returned until the term is over. No more, no less, than when they entered.
On the post: Trump, GOP Prepare To Gut FCC Boss Tom Wheeler's Populist Reforms...Under The False Banner Of Populist Reform
On the post: Stopping Turnkey Tyranny: What The Obama Administration Can Do About The NSA On The Way Out
What he could do is one thing, what he will do is nothing.
On the post: Updated! Massachusetts Police Dept. Files DMCA Takedowns On News Stories Using Mugshots Taken By Police
On the post: Trump's Picks For AG & CIA Happy To Undermine Civil Liberties, Increase Surveillance
On the post: President Obama Claims He Cannot Pardon Snowden; He's Wrong
On the post: Rutgers Lecturer Forcibly Sent For Psych Evaluation By NYPD For Some Tweets About The Election
Re:
On the post: Judge Leaning Strongly Towards Tossing Pimping Charges Against Backpage Executives
On the post: Rutgers Lecturer Forcibly Sent For Psych Evaluation By NYPD For Some Tweets About The Election
Re: Inflammatory 101
They would have had to have been believable.
The immediacy of the stirrings of emotion would have provoked a reasonable person to instantaneous violence.
And likely other conditions. A tweet is not going to fall into that category.
But then who cares about the Constitution until their rights are violated.
On the post: Rutgers Lecturer Forcibly Sent For Psych Evaluation By NYPD For Some Tweets About The Election
Re: Re: Re: I don't get it
The NYPD has even taken to using this technique on its own members when they insist that the orders of Federal Judges be followed.
It is certainly an arrest within the meaning of the word. Force, or the threat of force was used to move a man from one location to another. The police better hope it was an arrest, otherwise it would be unlawful imprisonment if the man was kept for less than 24 hours, kidnapping if longer.
On the post: UK Home Secretary Agrees To Turn Over Accused Hacker Lauri Love To US Government
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And is that the standard for not facing prosecution now?
After all, this is the definition that the FBI uses. How can we treat a human more harshly?
On the post: Appeals Court Issues Fantastic 1st Amendment Ruling Against Censorious Sheriff Thomas Dart In His Crusade Against The Internet
Re:
On the post: Appeals Court Issues Fantastic 1st Amendment Ruling Against Censorious Sheriff Thomas Dart In His Crusade Against The Internet
Re:
On the post: Judge Leaning Strongly Towards Tossing Pimping Charges Against Backpage Executives
On the post: Appeals Court To Cops: If You 'Don't Have Time' For 'Constitutional Bullshit,' You Don't Get Immunity
Re: Re: The suicide hotline ratted him out?
Have you never heard of swatting? It is simply justified homicide to the DA. And responses like yours help to perpetuate such actions.
On the post: It's Too Late For President Obama To 'Dismantle' The NSA's Mass Surveillance
Re: Nail on the Head!
On the post: Prosecutor Shuts Down New Orleans Cop's Attempt To Charge Arrestee With Hate Crime For Insulting Responding Officers
Re: What the hell was the purpose of this law?
Next >>