Yes. And then we have the general panic of government over mass communications (i.e. internet) answered with the furious pace of invasive government intrusion into those communications. A sealing off of the exists, if you will.
Re: Re: Re: Response to: Joe Dirt on Feb 10th, 2017 @ 1:29pm
Why?
Because freedom is dangerous?
Why?
Because trickle-down is an inverted geyser and for about 20-30 years that ever shrinking pile of pie eats itself before you can so much as reach for a fork?
And nothing's got nothing to do with a 40 year war on, what should always have been, free choice and a 15 year war on, what should be, a celebration? A celebration because our enemies can not defeat a nation of free people.
Why?
Because those that would do us real harm are the very same that would rob you blind for a profit?
Why?
Because you don't have a cite for "We do know that America is less safe a place than it was 20 or 30 years ago" and you just made stuff up to suite someone elses agenda. Free people can choose to protect themselves or they can choose to let someone else do the protecting for them. The unfortunate side-effect of the latter is most a peaceful slavery.
.. He says safely tucked away miles and lifetimes away from anything he mentions. You entitled pussy. People died for this and you're afraid of mexican gangs and islam. Brav-o.
Does freedom frighten you? You may have confused freedom for safety. Or do you need to feel safe to feel free?
But you may be partially onto something. America seems to have compromised herself from within - that does not a secure nation make. Daddy hairbucks is now the leader of the free world and this is shaping up to be a right cunt of a run. Nothing good will come from this - unless you're just in it for the money then you might stand half a chance.
Well, ultimately, we do own the place, so if we let the managers drive our shop into the ground it's certainly not the managers that have to deal with the brunt of the mess.
It's going to get to a point where we either do drugs and keep being entertained, pull a hostile takeover and burn it all down or step the fuck up and eliminate the deafening voices that are the very essence of filth, greed, obstruction and destruction.
I think the unfortunate thing about your post is that it's an indication of the abject failure of thought that represents the overwhelming preponderance of a crash hazard that is the main voting block.
psst, hey, your agenda is showing again, cover that shit. It seems that the script in your head has not come to terms with the words your eyes have taken in and as a result your output cannot be reconciled with previous inputs. Nothing is "OK". Funny how both ways goes both ways.
Well, it appears that after a few page loads, my girl, five beers, two fat rails and .. I don't know, a lot of bong hits that while waiting for anonymous smartyspooky pants here to drop a hint I've achieved pretty damn high, so.. for scale fitment I'm definitely somewhere between the first w and h. For sure. I might even be a bit close to o. I'm definitely pretty much totally who'd, I think, yeah.
Is this your first time posting? Were you scared? .. Did you need meds? I definitely do, fuck, shit is real.
So, since, you know, meds, any idea what kind of rabbit he's got in that hat? No? Well I've read the wiki god damn pedia page three times and can find no hint of a reason why congress is not on the road to tyranny. Dude said I was completely wrong. Harsh, man. Totally harsh.
Not completely incorrect but I'll forgive you your line of sight. As for that horse, seriously, dude, how the hell do you get onto that thing every day? That thing's a beast.
(kshchk) Eh? (kchkt) What difference could that ever possibly make, ever, passenger person? (kchk) You know he's the president (kchk) right? Same flight, same rules (kchkt) Buckle up, cowboy. (kcht)
(kshchskt) This is the captain speaking, obviously (krschkt) Captain Jones, not captain obvious (krscht) Right, anyway (kcht) we're experiencing some pre-turbulence turbulence right now and the tower (kschkt) The tower says we're in for a rough ride (kchtskt) (..awkward delay..) (kchsst) So please stay in your seats with your seat belts fastened and please let the pretty stewardess kiss you goodbye. But not really, the pretty one is my wife. (kcht) Good luck next time and thank you for flying We Deserve This Airlines and we hope you'll fly with us the next time you feel like visiting Not Giving One Fuck About What Happens in Reality Island (kcht) Enjoy the rest of the flight (krchst)
On the post: New DOJ Boss Says He Hasn't Read DOJ Investigations Into Abusive Policing, Calls Them 'Anecdotal'
On the post: Judge Rejects Warrant Seeking To Force Everyone At A Searched Location To Unlock Seized Electronic Devices
Re:
On the post: Federal Election Commission Member Quits, Says Agency Refuses To Address Campaign Finance Violations
Re: So...monarchy then?
First they came for the immigrants..
On the post: Federal Election Commission Member Quits, Says Agency Refuses To Address Campaign Finance Violations
Re: Re: Re: Ah yiss!
On the post: Federal Election Commission Member Quits, Says Agency Refuses To Address Campaign Finance Violations
Re: Ah yiss!
On the post: Trump Issues Executive Orders To Make A Safe Nation Safe And Protect Cops Who Don't Need Protection
Re:
On the post: Trump Issues Executive Orders To Make A Safe Nation Safe And Protect Cops Who Don't Need Protection
Re: Re: Re: Response to: Joe Dirt on Feb 10th, 2017 @ 1:29pm
Because freedom is dangerous?
Why?
Because trickle-down is an inverted geyser and for about 20-30 years that ever shrinking pile of pie eats itself before you can so much as reach for a fork?
And nothing's got nothing to do with a 40 year war on, what should always have been, free choice and a 15 year war on, what should be, a celebration? A celebration because our enemies can not defeat a nation of free people.
Why?
Because those that would do us real harm are the very same that would rob you blind for a profit?
Why?
Because you don't have a cite for "We do know that America is less safe a place than it was 20 or 30 years ago" and you just made stuff up to suite someone elses agenda. Free people can choose to protect themselves or they can choose to let someone else do the protecting for them. The unfortunate side-effect of the latter is most a peaceful slavery.
On the post: Trump Issues Executive Orders To Make A Safe Nation Safe And Protect Cops Who Don't Need Protection
Re: trump
Does freedom frighten you? You may have confused freedom for safety. Or do you need to feel safe to feel free?
But you may be partially onto something. America seems to have compromised herself from within - that does not a secure nation make. Daddy hairbucks is now the leader of the free world and this is shaping up to be a right cunt of a run. Nothing good will come from this - unless you're just in it for the money then you might stand half a chance.
On the post: Trump Issues Executive Orders To Make A Safe Nation Safe And Protect Cops Who Don't Need Protection
On the post: President Trump's White House Reaching New Lows In Accountability And Transparency
Re: Re: Re: 10 steps to Fascism..
Pathetic.
On the post: President Trump's White House Reaching New Lows In Accountability And Transparency
Re: Re: 10 steps to Fascism..
On the post: The Biggest Advocates For An Imperial Executive Branch Are Suddenly Freaking Out Over Trump
Re: Re: Re: Re: The American Experiment
On the post: The Biggest Advocates For An Imperial Executive Branch Are Suddenly Freaking Out Over Trump
Re: Re: Re: The American Experiment
It's going to get to a point where we either do drugs and keep being entertained, pull a hostile takeover and burn it all down or step the fuck up and eliminate the deafening voices that are the very essence of filth, greed, obstruction and destruction.
The greater good.. indeed.
On the post: The Biggest Advocates For An Imperial Executive Branch Are Suddenly Freaking Out Over Trump
Re:
On the post: Congress Tries Once Again To Require Warrants To Search Emails
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Congress Tries Once Again To Require Warrants To Search Emails
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Well, it appears that after a few page loads, my girl, five beers, two fat rails and .. I don't know, a lot of bong hits that while waiting for anonymous smartyspooky pants here to drop a hint I've achieved pretty damn high, so.. for scale fitment I'm definitely somewhere between the first w and h. For sure. I might even be a bit close to o. I'm definitely pretty much totally who'd, I think, yeah.
Is this your first time posting? Were you scared? .. Did you need meds? I definitely do, fuck, shit is real.
So, since, you know, meds, any idea what kind of rabbit he's got in that hat? No? Well I've read the wiki god damn pedia page three times and can find no hint of a reason why congress is not on the road to tyranny. Dude said I was completely wrong. Harsh, man. Totally harsh.
On the post: Congress Tries Once Again To Require Warrants To Search Emails
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Congress Tries Once Again To Require Warrants To Search Emails
Re:
On the post: Trump Muzzles Federal Employees; Reporters Start Asking For Leaks
Re: Re:
On the post: Trump Muzzles Federal Employees; Reporters Start Asking For Leaks
Next >>