"lengths of thin organinc material viabrating in air forced from lungs in human beings throats to create sound waves..."
Which is prior art and not patentable.
Now consider developing an engineered organic or inorganic material which would not cause an immune response when implanted and you probably would have a patentable invention.
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
"lengths of thin organinc material viabrating in air forced from lungs in human beings throats to create sound waves..."
Which is prior art and not patentable.
Now consider developing an engineered organic or inorganic material which would not cause an immune response when implanted and you probably would have a patentable invention.
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
"Raise your hand here if you have a degree that deals in economics and business. Mike?"
Which goes to show how there is a difference between jumping through academic hoops and actually understanding an issue. In theory higher education is supposed to instill reasoning but the reality is it often does not.
I am constantly stunned by how limited most college graduates are. One example was a 26 year old I employed. They were dealing with a problem and I explained that one grows professionally as a result of overcoming close encounters with the "Peter Principle".
The person had a blank look, so asked if they knew what the "Peter Principle" as about. Their reply, as it something sexual.
It seems that most of TechDIRTers need to read about the "Peter Principle" because it is pretty clear that they have not grown from close encounters, rather they have succumbed.
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
Lo profit margins equals low wages and slow growth. Patents give an inventor the right to control the invention which they have taught via the patent for twenty years from date of filing. This compensates the inventor for both the act of inventing and the time and cost of teaching. It allows the inventor to recover their investment, and gives them profits to fund subsequent inventions.
If all inventions can be copied immediately there is no incentive to invent and all inventions are immediately transferred to the lowest wage countries.
The end result is no jobs in the countries who people are inventing, a collapsing economy, and a drop in the standard of living of developed countries. That drop eventually places those countries standard of living at or near that of the developing countries.
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
Inventors with patents have one choice, the law allows them to sue for damages. Big company steals and when caught whines about mythical trolls.
Inventor sues, wins on merit, and big company whines about trolls and injustice. Take RIM as an example, they paid $612 million and whined about invalid patents, except when the dust settled five years later there were still infringed claims.
"There was an article not too long ago here that showed"
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
I predict that the defendants either roll over and pay up or they will end up buying KY in semi loads.
Ronald J. Riley,
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
Ronald J. Riley,
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
Patents are not granted for "ideas". They are granted for specific solutions.
The public does care about prosperity and jobs. When developed countries are competing with low wage developing countries patent property rights are the source of higher profit margins which support paying higher wages.
No business can produce the kind of profits needed to sustain our standard of living reselling commodities. If anyone on TechDIRT actually understood economics they would know that unpatented products and services profit margins drop to the lowest sustainable rate.
Ronald J. Riley,
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
"And right now there is a strong case that the balance is way too far on the side of litigation."
We have litigation because we have widespread theft of inventions and patent property rights. Litigation will stop as soon as big companies quit stealing.
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
Interval Research inventor Michael Naimark also said:
"I am also committed to fostering a vibrant creative culture. Long-term labs like Interval Research don�t come along often, and I�m grateful for Paul Allen�s support. But the stage is now set for enormous resources, from all sides, to support litigation over innovation. The creative community needs all the support it can muster, and it�s a perplexing thought that the money at risk in this lawsuit will likely exceed the annual budget of the National Endowment for the Arts, possibly several times over. It could be hugely significant if all parties commit to something good for the creative community as an outcome."
"Finally, I�m committed to that which got us here in the first place: working in a creative, collaborative research setting then making something real of it."
It seems to me that what Michael Naimark is saying is that he is dissapointed that it takes litigation to get large companies to respect others Patent Property Rights.
Mike Masnick constantly acts like he understands the economics of invention business when he is clueless. The fact that opportunities like Interval Research are rare is related to recovering investments. The amounts involved in Interval's litigations and many others demonstrate that large entitlement minded companies are stealing on a grand scale.
It is a shame that it takes litigation in order for inventors and invention producing companies to be compensated. The invention business is much like the wild west, and invention stealing large companies have forced inventors to have their own gunslinger in tow in the form of a litigator. Fault for the necessary to litigate lies completely with companies who act as if they have an inalienable right to to "innovate" through unauthorized use of inventors property.
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
"I seriously doubt that the creators if the patent laws wanted to protect the process of selling the ability to sue over infringement."
Once again you are wrong, because the only recourse patent law gives an inventor when someone steals their invention is to recover damages and to get an injunction.
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
They are a Patent Pirating company's worst nightmare:)
"Unfortunately in these cases the "original inventors" are all two often lawyers themselves - who haven't invented anything at all,"
Think about this carefully. Patent attorneys have an engineering or scientific degree first followed by a law degree. Then they spend years prosecuting patents and in the process learn diverse disciplines.
They are naturals for becoming inventors, and I think we all can agree that being an inventor is a higher skill and has more social value than being just a lawyer.
Their lawyer skills likely mean they produce much higher quality patents which enhances their likelihood of prevailing over those who steal others inventions. They are a Patent Pirating company's worst nightmare:)
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
"Should cable companies all be sued over On-Demand technology & methodology years after it's in use because the patent [sic] finally got in the hands of people who want to make money off the suit? No."
While there is some competition between players in industries they also collaborate. It is common for all players in an industry to try and starve inventors into giving up. They collectively use inventions while counting on inventors to not be able to get a backer with the resources to sue. It often takes inventors 5-10 years to find a partner with the resources and will to defend their patent property rights.
Justice delayed is justice denied, but better late than never.
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
"I don't think I like a system that reward failure."
How about all the failures by companies who cannot produce inventions? Their success is based on ripping off and combining others inventions into products.
Some peoples skills are inventing. Many more people who lack the ability to invent are good at having something made and marketing it. Yet they could not have made the product all all if not for inventors.
So the truth in all this is that the failures are marketing hucksters. They are unethical parasites.
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
"I don't think I like a system that reward failure."
How about all the failures by companies who cannot produce inventions? Their success is based on ripping off and combining others inventions into products.
Some peoples skills are inventing. Many more people who lack the ability to invent are good at having something made and marketing it. Yet they could not have made the product all all if not for inventors.
So the truth in all this is that the failures are marketing hucksters. They are unethical parasites.
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
"in your case, we know why you ignore the studies."
Mike Masnick,
It is you who ignore an overwhelming body of information which runs counter to your agenda. I have seen you and your minions repeatedly ignore and dismiss valid information which many people have presented. In light of a consistent pattern of half truths coupled with outright lies.
There is a reason that inventors respond to you in the manner they do. Your arguments about patents are intellectually dishonest. I think you know this.
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
"You missed the part about "non-obvious" and "broad". Have you read these patents? They never should have been issued in the first place."
And your qualifications to make this determination are?
Ronald J. Riley,
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
Leahy is just milking Patent Deform for contributions. It sure looks like an extortion racket to me. It is time that all the players come together and fund an opponent of Leahy.
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
On the post: Lead Inventor On One Of The Patents Paul Allen Is Suing Over Worries About Litigation Over Innovation
Re: Patents
Which is prior art and not patentable.
Now consider developing an engineered organic or inorganic material which would not cause an immune response when implanted and you probably would have a patentable invention.
Ronald J. Riley,
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
On the post: Lead Inventor On One Of The Patents Paul Allen Is Suing Over Worries About Litigation Over Innovation
Re: Patents
Which is prior art and not patentable.
Now consider developing an engineered organic or inorganic material which would not cause an immune response when implanted and you probably would have a patentable invention.
Ronald J. Riley,
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
On the post: Lead Inventor On One Of The Patents Paul Allen Is Suing Over Worries About Litigation Over Innovation
Re: Re: "theft" of an idea
Which goes to show how there is a difference between jumping through academic hoops and actually understanding an issue. In theory higher education is supposed to instill reasoning but the reality is it often does not.
I am constantly stunned by how limited most college graduates are. One example was a 26 year old I employed. They were dealing with a problem and I explained that one grows professionally as a result of overcoming close encounters with the "Peter Principle".
The person had a blank look, so asked if they knew what the "Peter Principle" as about. Their reply, as it something sexual.
It seems that most of TechDIRTers need to read about the "Peter Principle" because it is pretty clear that they have not grown from close encounters, rather they have succumbed.
Ronald J. Riley,
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
On the post: Lead Inventor On One Of The Patents Paul Allen Is Suing Over Worries About Litigation Over Innovation
Re: Re: "theft" of an idea
Economics 101
Lo profit margins equals low wages and slow growth. Patents give an inventor the right to control the invention which they have taught via the patent for twenty years from date of filing. This compensates the inventor for both the act of inventing and the time and cost of teaching. It allows the inventor to recover their investment, and gives them profits to fund subsequent inventions.
If all inventions can be copied immediately there is no incentive to invent and all inventions are immediately transferred to the lowest wage countries.
The end result is no jobs in the countries who people are inventing, a collapsing economy, and a drop in the standard of living of developed countries. That drop eventually places those countries standard of living at or near that of the developing countries.
Ronald J. Riley,
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
On the post: Lead Inventor On One Of The Patents Paul Allen Is Suing Over Worries About Litigation Over Innovation
TechDIRT Drivel
Inventors with patents have one choice, the law allows them to sue for damages. Big company steals and when caught whines about mythical trolls.
Inventor sues, wins on merit, and big company whines about trolls and injustice. Take RIM as an example, they paid $612 million and whined about invalid patents, except when the dust settled five years later there were still infringed claims.
"There was an article not too long ago here that showed"
Showed more TechDIRT Drivel.
Ronald J. Riley,
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
On the post: Lead Inventor On One Of The Patents Paul Allen Is Suing Over Worries About Litigation Over Innovation
Re: Re: Wild West - Transnational Corp Style
I predict that the defendants either roll over and pay up or they will end up buying KY in semi loads.
Ronald J. Riley,
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
Ronald J. Riley,
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
On the post: Lead Inventor On One Of The Patents Paul Allen Is Suing Over Worries About Litigation Over Innovation
"theft" of an idea
The public does care about prosperity and jobs. When developed countries are competing with low wage developing countries patent property rights are the source of higher profit margins which support paying higher wages.
No business can produce the kind of profits needed to sustain our standard of living reselling commodities. If anyone on TechDIRT actually understood economics they would know that unpatented products and services profit margins drop to the lowest sustainable rate.
Ronald J. Riley,
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
On the post: Lead Inventor On One Of The Patents Paul Allen Is Suing Over Worries About Litigation Over Innovation
Cause and Effect - Theft is cause of litigation.
We have litigation because we have widespread theft of inventions and patent property rights. Litigation will stop as soon as big companies quit stealing.
Ronald J. Riley,
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
On the post: Lead Inventor On One Of The Patents Paul Allen Is Suing Over Worries About Litigation Over Innovation
Wild West - Transnational Corp Style
"I am also committed to fostering a vibrant creative culture. Long-term labs like Interval Research don�t come along often, and I�m grateful for Paul Allen�s support. But the stage is now set for enormous resources, from all sides, to support litigation over innovation. The creative community needs all the support it can muster, and it�s a perplexing thought that the money at risk in this lawsuit will likely exceed the annual budget of the National Endowment for the Arts, possibly several times over. It could be hugely significant if all parties commit to something good for the creative community as an outcome."
"Finally, I�m committed to that which got us here in the first place: working in a creative, collaborative research setting then making something real of it."
It seems to me that what Michael Naimark is saying is that he is dissapointed that it takes litigation to get large companies to respect others Patent Property Rights.
Mike Masnick constantly acts like he understands the economics of invention business when he is clueless. The fact that opportunities like Interval Research are rare is related to recovering investments. The amounts involved in Interval's litigations and many others demonstrate that large entitlement minded companies are stealing on a grand scale.
It is a shame that it takes litigation in order for inventors and invention producing companies to be compensated. The invention business is much like the wild west, and invention stealing large companies have forced inventors to have their own gunslinger in tow in the form of a litigator. Fault for the necessary to litigate lies completely with companies who act as if they have an inalienable right to to "innovate" through unauthorized use of inventors property.
Ronald J. Riley,
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
On the post: More Patents That Have Touched Both Intellectual Ventures And Ocean Tomo Showing Up In Lawsuits
Re: A new take on an old saying...
Those who cannot invent steal, and those who did invent hold the crooks accountable.
Ronald J. Riley,
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
On the post: More Patents That Have Touched Both Intellectual Ventures And Ocean Tomo Showing Up In Lawsuits
TechDIRT Insider Wrong Again.
Once again you are wrong, because the only recourse patent law gives an inventor when someone steals their invention is to recover damages and to get an injunction.
Ronald J. Riley,
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
On the post: More Patents That Have Touched Both Intellectual Ventures And Ocean Tomo Showing Up In Lawsuits
They are a Patent Pirating company's worst nightmare:)
Think about this carefully. Patent attorneys have an engineering or scientific degree first followed by a law degree. Then they spend years prosecuting patents and in the process learn diverse disciplines.
They are naturals for becoming inventors, and I think we all can agree that being an inventor is a higher skill and has more social value than being just a lawyer.
Their lawyer skills likely mean they produce much higher quality patents which enhances their likelihood of prevailing over those who steal others inventions. They are a Patent Pirating company's worst nightmare:)
Ronald J. Riley,
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
On the post: More Patents That Have Touched Both Intellectual Ventures And Ocean Tomo Showing Up In Lawsuits
Beter late than never
While there is some competition between players in industries they also collaborate. It is common for all players in an industry to try and starve inventors into giving up. They collectively use inventions while counting on inventors to not be able to get a backer with the resources to sue. It often takes inventors 5-10 years to find a partner with the resources and will to defend their patent property rights.
Justice delayed is justice denied, but better late than never.
Ronald J. Riley,
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
On the post: More Patents That Have Touched Both Intellectual Ventures And Ocean Tomo Showing Up In Lawsuits
Producing an invention = success
How about all the failures by companies who cannot produce inventions? Their success is based on ripping off and combining others inventions into products.
Some peoples skills are inventing. Many more people who lack the ability to invent are good at having something made and marketing it. Yet they could not have made the product all all if not for inventors.
So the truth in all this is that the failures are marketing hucksters. They are unethical parasites.
Ronald J. Riley,
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
On the post: More Patents That Have Touched Both Intellectual Ventures And Ocean Tomo Showing Up In Lawsuits
Producing an invention = success
How about all the failures by companies who cannot produce inventions? Their success is based on ripping off and combining others inventions into products.
Some peoples skills are inventing. Many more people who lack the ability to invent are good at having something made and marketing it. Yet they could not have made the product all all if not for inventors.
So the truth in all this is that the failures are marketing hucksters. They are unethical parasites.
Ronald J. Riley,
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
On the post: The Amazing Ability Of People To Simply Ignore Data That Proves What They Believe Is Wrong
Re: Re: Humor & Irony
Mike Masnick,
It is you who ignore an overwhelming body of information which runs counter to your agenda. I have seen you and your minions repeatedly ignore and dismiss valid information which many people have presented. In light of a consistent pattern of half truths coupled with outright lies.
There is a reason that inventors respond to you in the manner they do. Your arguments about patents are intellectually dishonest. I think you know this.
Ronald J. Riley,
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
On the post: More Patents That Have Touched Both Intellectual Ventures And Ocean Tomo Showing Up In Lawsuits
More TechDIRT Drivel based on ignorance.
And your qualifications to make this determination are?
Ronald J. Riley,
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
On the post: Leahy Brings Back Patent Reform Act That Doesn't Actually Fix Any Of The Patent System's Problems
Racket
Some needs to pass a law to stop this.
Ronald J. Riley,
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
On the post: The Companies Who Support Censoring The Internet
Take Action / Re:
I agree completely.
1) I suggest writing a letter opposing this. I would be happy to sign on and would encourage others in our community to do the same.
2) Organize a boycott.
Ronald J. Riley,
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
On the post: Sony Gets Restraining Order Against Guy Who Restored PS3 Feature Sony Deleted
Sony is Style Without Substance
Several years ago I purchased three Sony notebooks at a total cost of about $10,000.
All three failed in less than a year, usually while I was traveling.
These computers turned out to be style without substance, the hallmark of Sony. They suffered from poor engineering, both hardware and software.
On top of that Sony service was a nightmare.
I have not purchased any Sony products since. Sony should be avoided at all costs.
Ronald J. Riley,
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Other Affiliations:
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
Next >>