I'm hearing that Norton's response is that the cryptominer is "integral" to the function of their software, and that they're deleting peoples' posts on how to disable it.
House of Propane is just your average smoothbrained right-wing shitposter, a dime a dozen.
BurnttoShreds's position on Section 230 is "proudly ignorant."
Counter his rotbrained horseshit with facts and law, and he'll stamp his little feet in impotent rage and bluster, but he's never been able to muster anything more substantial than baseless ad-hominem like you linked.
It's useful to note that both "House of Propane" and "BurntToShreds" are well-known to be moronic trolls who have never spouted off anything of value there.
"ground and airborne aeronautical mobile telemetry systems operate immediately above radio altimeters at power levels comparable to 5G base stations and—for ground stations—with antennas pointed at aircraft," the carriers said. "In fact, the aviation industry's own Wireless Avionics Intra-Communications (WAIC) systems [are] designed to operate in the very same spectrum as radio altimeters." Those aviation industry systems "would not pass the tests" that the aviation industry used in research that purported to show 5G would interfere with altimeters,"
And there's a bit of publishers' mafia-esque behavior to blame for part of that, as anyone who admits they provided their work to Sci-Hub would likely quickly find themselves blackballed from "legitimate" publishers.
On the post: NY Senator Proposes Ridiculously Unconstitutional Social Media Law That Is The Mirror Opposite Of Equally Unconstitutional Laws In Florida & Texas
Re: Memo to Dems
.. said nobody capable of rational, independent thought, ever.
On the post: Federal Court Tells Proud Boys Defendants That Raiding The Capitol Building Isn't Covered By The First Amendment
Re: Re: Re: FTFY
And you incontrovertibly prove me correct. Well done.
On the post: Federal Court Tells Proud Boys Defendants That Raiding The Capitol Building Isn't Covered By The First Amendment
Re: FTFY
[Halucinates facts contrary to all evidence]
On the post: Norton 360 Now Comes With Crypto Mining Capabilities And Sketchy Removal Process
I'm hearing that Norton's response is that the cryptominer is "integral" to the function of their software, and that they're deleting peoples' posts on how to disable it.
On the post: The Making Of A Moral Panic, Courtesy Of The NY Times
Re: Re: Re: Re:
House of Propane is just your average smoothbrained right-wing shitposter, a dime a dozen.
BurnttoShreds's position on Section 230 is "proudly ignorant."
Counter his rotbrained horseshit with facts and law, and he'll stamp his little feet in impotent rage and bluster, but he's never been able to muster anything more substantial than baseless ad-hominem like you linked.
On the post: The Making Of A Moral Panic, Courtesy Of The NY Times
Re: Re:
It's useful to note that both "House of Propane" and "BurntToShreds" are well-known to be moronic trolls who have never spouted off anything of value there.
On the post: A Fight Between Facebook And The British Medical Journal Highlights The Difficulty Of Moderating 'Medical Misinformation'
Re: BMJ piece against Wakefield was itself "fraudulent"
[Projects facts not in evidence]
On the post: ICE Is So Toxic That The DHS's Investigative Wing Is Asking To Be Completely Separated From It
Re: Re: Re: Re:
See also: lostinlodos
On the post: ICE Is So Toxic That The DHS's Investigative Wing Is Asking To Be Completely Separated From It
Re: Re:
We recently saw that many were happy to live their fantasies of being plantation slave drivers whipping people from horseback.
On the post: Wireless Carriers Balk At FAA Demand For 5G Deployment Delays Amid Shaky Safety Concerns
Ajit Pai and Tom Wheeler agree: The FAA is behaving badly in battle against FCC
FAA fights use of spectrum that's already deployed safely in dozens of countries.
On the post: The Copyright Industry Wants Everything Filtered As It Is Uploaded; Here's Why That Will Be A Disaster
Re: Youtube is a great example to illustrate how ...
So why do you deliberately lie that they can't?
We get it, you hate free speech.
On the post: California Police Officers' Bigoted Text Messages Have Just Undone Dozens Of Felony Cases
Re: An Outright Lie from Cushing
[Projects facts contrary to evidence]
On the post: Confused Judge Grants Project Veritas' Prior Restraint Against The NY Times
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Other Side
Times chozen's claims have been supported by either fact or law:
0
On the post: Canada Strikes Again: Allows Lawsuit Against Twitter To Proceed Over Speech Of Twitter Users
Re: Re: Re:
If you wanted to prove you're illiterate, then contratulations you succeeded.
On the post: Sci-Hub's Creator Thinks Academic Publishers, Not Her Site, Are The Real Threat To Science, And Says: 'Any Law Against Knowledge Is Fundamentally Unjust'
Re:
And there's a bit of publishers' mafia-esque behavior to blame for part of that, as anyone who admits they provided their work to Sci-Hub would likely quickly find themselves blackballed from "legitimate" publishers.
On the post: Retailers Are Blaming The Internet For A Retail Theft Surge That Might Not Be Happening; Media Is Helping Them Out
Re:
When you coordinate online with a few dozen accomplices to form the mob to provide cover for you to do so.
On the post: Chinese Gov't Inflicts Its Selective Amnesia On Hong Kong, Forcing The Removal Of Tiananmen Square Massacre Monuments
Re:
Republicans are not afraid of Critical Race Theory.
They don't even know what it is.
They're afraid of theories critical of racists.
They know who they are.
-John Pavlovitz
On the post: Weeks After Blasting Twitter For 'Strangling Free Expression' GETTR Bans The Term 'Groyper' In Effort To Stop White Nationalist Spam
Re: Refreshing Honesty
[Hallucinates facts contrary to reality]
On the post: Texas Regulators Learned Nothing From February's Carnage, Prepare To Repeat The Cycle
Re: Guess What?
[Projects facts not in evidence]
On the post: Judge Wants To Know If DOJ Ignored Its Own Journalist-Targeting Guidelines When Investigating An Infowars Host Who Raided The Capitol
Re: Re: Thank you
It's also nonexistent.
Next >>