"But instead, countless cable and broadcast executives continue to just double down on legacy turf protection and rampant rate hikes -- in the false belief that the traditional TV cash cow they've been milking for decades is somehow immortal. "
Kodak would approve it but then Pai had to come and threaten the party by making such idiocy sustainable due to natural monopolies and regulatory capture.
Interestingly the rules only determine that things remain the same as before the ISPs started engaging in anti-competitive NN-killing behavior in India as well but I would expect India to follow the path the US is going down and not the opposite. Admitedly this is just preconceptions at work but it is surprising nonetheless.
Sounds sensible. The employee should be criminally charged but the company should bear the costs of the cleanup to act as a wake up call to other companies to address such vulnerability and take steps accordingly (if thay haven't already).
Because they should always be as fast as the connection you bought, without discriminating traffic. If you choose to stuff your pipes with cat videos they should come at the same speed regardless of if you are loading from Youtube and from Dailymotion.
It's quite simple, really. I'm amused that you can't understand it.
Really? Does it explain how the FCC is ignoring the massive bipartisan support the current rules have? Does it explain why the FCC is refusing to release any information on the alleged DDoS on the comment systems? Does it explain why the FCC is ignoring the blatant fraud going on in the comments for this?
Expect a 1000+ page document if all these things are added.
"Oh I read it and it's 400 pages of anti-consumer stuff" said all of those that didn't bother to read and had ISP lobbying bs fit right in their asses.
There's no limit to cop abuses it seems. And with a semi-compliant judiciary, a negligent legislative and an authoritarian executive this will not be the last absurd we'll hear. I won't be surprised when we hear that cops made a couple of teens have sex to produce pictures to compare with evidence.
If Pai loses a vote in the FCC it will be something historical. As far as I know it boils down to partisan bs historically. And even if it wasn't, Republicans. I think it explains all.
Doesn't sound like a threat to me (even though it is sort of in that scrolls and pit of misery part). It's rather a friendly reminder that the trademark is taken and in use. Sounds like exactly what trademark should be doing.
Re: But I don't trust your "us", either, Google-boy!
Even if it was the case (not, TD has criticized Google plenty of times already) there are two important distinctions: Mike is clearly disclaiming the sponsors and he is not the head of the regulating body responsible for, you know, regulating his sponsors.
It's not that you don't trust, you just have a severe psychiatric issue that causes ill obsession by something, in your case Mike.
Sure it's not fascism yet but it's pretty much heading there. Not this single fact alone mind you. I'd guess the original comment was looking at the broader context as well.
This article managed to nail Godwin's Law in the headline. Amazing.
The problem is that probably Hitler wouldn't have found an audience for his ideas outside of the context of his time. Pop a few terror attacks in Germany and people may start thinking twice. This type of moron has to be metaphorically killed in the nest. And yet he is inside the govt.
There will be an inevitable pile of lawsuits against the FCC as soon as the vote is concluded (the result by now is already decided, has been since Trump got elected). Still they can just pretend they aren't seeing NN violations until the next chairman/woman comes so prepare for a few more years of fuckery.
I do think Pai won't manage to repeal NN, he will be stopped via courts because his arguments are incredibly weak. And he can't make all the judges ignore the myriad of evidence that NN benefits everybody.
On the post: Shocker: Study Finds Cord Cutting Very Real, TV Execs Still Failing To Adapt
Kodak would approve it but then Pai had to come and threaten the party by making such idiocy sustainable due to natural monopolies and regulatory capture.
On the post: India Embraces Full Net Neutrality As The U.S. Turns Its Back On The Concept
On the post: Russia Says Disconnecting From The Rest Of The Net 'Out Of The Question', But Wants Alternative DNS Servers For BRICS Nations
Of course they'd need to make it illegal to use open DNS servers for this to fully match with their authoritarian ideas.
On the post: UK Court Says Company Is Innocent In Massive Data Breach Caused By Vindictive Employee, But Must Nonetheless Pay Compensation
On the post: Why I Changed My Mind On Net Neutrality
Re: Re: eNFORCEMENT?
It's quite simple, really. I'm amused that you can't understand it.
On the post: FCC Boss Lies Again, Insists Net Neutrality Harms The Sick And Disabled
On the post: What Happened To Everyone Complaining About The Length Of The 2015 Net Neutrality Rules?
Re: 200 pages?
Expect a 1000+ page document if all these things are added.
On the post: What Happened To Everyone Complaining About The Length Of The 2015 Net Neutrality Rules?
On the post: Appeals Court: Forcing A Teen To Masturbate So Cops Can Take Pictures Is A Clear Violation Of Rights
On the post: The FCC Tried To Hide Net Neutrality Complaints Against ISPs
Re:
On the post: The FCC Tried To Hide Net Neutrality Complaints Against ISPs
The bright side is that Pai is giving plenty of ammunition to stop NN dismantling via courts.
On the post: Where Credit's Due: Budweiser Goes The Cool And Funny Route On Microbrewery's 'Dilly Dilly' Craft IPA
Re:
On the post: Days Before Doing Verizon's Bidding, Ajit Pai Gives A Talk At Verizon
Re: Re: Grasping at straws.
On the post: Days Before Doing Verizon's Bidding, Ajit Pai Gives A Talk At Verizon
Re: But I don't trust your "us", either, Google-boy!
It's not that you don't trust, you just have a severe psychiatric issue that causes ill obsession by something, in your case Mike.
On the post: Days Before Doing Verizon's Bidding, Ajit Pai Gives A Talk At Verizon
On the post: Ajit Pai Doesn't Want You Talking About Court Ruling That Undermines His Bogus Claim That The FTC Will Protect Consumers
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: AT&T, Whose Ex-CEO Promised To Wreck Net Neutrality, Insists It Won't Do Anything To Net Neutrality
What the customers would like you to do is shut up and let them use the pipes they are already paying for with no restriction you moron.
On the post: Top EU Privacy Campaigner Says He Wants Lots Of Money For 'None Of Your Business'
On the post: German Government Official Wants Backdoors In Every Device Connected To The Internet
The problem is that probably Hitler wouldn't have found an audience for his ideas outside of the context of his time. Pop a few terror attacks in Germany and people may start thinking twice. This type of moron has to be metaphorically killed in the nest. And yet he is inside the govt.
Sure he is kind of a laughingstock. So was Trump.
On the post: Ajit Pai Doesn't Want You Talking About Court Ruling That Undermines His Bogus Claim That The FTC Will Protect Consumers
I do think Pai won't manage to repeal NN, he will be stopped via courts because his arguments are incredibly weak. And he can't make all the judges ignore the myriad of evidence that NN benefits everybody.
Next >>