How a movie studio making more money on something is more important than people being slaughtered or treated in such a way as would be seen cruel is a vile comparison.
Stupid non-profits. Trying to save children all over the world from terrible people, and this guy is worried that I might have downloaded Amile after my dog ate the disk.
In the end of this the consumer loses regardless of the concessions which are gained by this. At&t has a history of doing this. They are like the T1000. You break it all apart and overtime it reassembles itself.
The Incoherent One (profile), 31 Aug 2011 @ 2:45pm
Re: Re: Re: Re:
My bad, I was reading another troll while crafting that response. I did not mean to come off in such a curt manner. You did (very clearly) express that.
The Incoherent One (profile), 31 Aug 2011 @ 12:46pm
Re: Re:
You are lending to much credibility to the French, and their government which you know does not give a shit. HADOPI was Sarkozy's baby and he treated it as such.
The Incoherent One (profile), 25 Aug 2011 @ 11:49am
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
No, I got that, but my point was that if the editorial is written in a matter than is more objective, and tells more than one side of the story that I grant it a little more credibility. It may not stand on its own, but that's why you get multiple sources.
The article which Tim is commenting on is written from one side, using "facts" which aren't true, and again misses the point of why we do not like the Protect IP Act. It does however sound pretty much like a PR piece both the RIAA and MPAA wrote about why they support Protect IP.
On the post: Internet Troll Jailed In The UK For Being A Jerk Online
Re: Re: Obnoxious Speech
On the post: Internet Troll Jailed In The UK For Being A Jerk Online
Re: Re: westboro baptist
On the post: Guy Who Created The TSA Says It's Failed, And It's Time To Dismantle It
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Willful blindness
On the post: Guy Who Created The TSA Says It's Failed, And It's Time To Dismantle It
Re: Re: Re: Re: Completely Effective
On the post: SF MusicTech: A New Hope
Precautionary
On the post: Hollywood Accounting: Darth Vader Not Getting Paid, Because Return Of The Jedi Still Isn't Profitable
Re: Me too!
On the post: Hollywood Accounting: Darth Vader Not Getting Paid, Because Return Of The Jedi Still Isn't Profitable
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Hollywood Accounting: Darth Vader Not Getting Paid, Because Return Of The Jedi Still Isn't Profitable
Re:
This is not the contract we signed.
/waves hand again
This is the new contract which we need you to sign.
On the post: Hollywood Accounting: Darth Vader Not Getting Paid, Because Return Of The Jedi Still Isn't Profitable
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
Re: Re:
On the post: Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
Re: Re:
On the post: France: Copyright Is More Important Than Human Rights
Re: Re: Re:
How a movie studio making more money on something is more important than people being slaughtered or treated in such a way as would be seen cruel is a vile comparison.
On the post: France: Copyright Is More Important Than Human Rights
Re:
On the post: Surprise: Justice Department Says AT&T/T-Mobile Merger Would Be Anticompetitive
Re:
On the post: What Can Bring Together Opposites On The Traditional Political Spectrum? A Fear Of Censorship Due To PROTECT IP
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Surprise: Justice Department Says AT&T/T-Mobile Merger Would Be Anticompetitive
Re:
No, Im sure they payed off many people. Problem is they either forgot one, or they payed the wrong people.
On the post: Surprise: Justice Department Says AT&T/T-Mobile Merger Would Be Anticompetitive
On the post: What Can Bring Together Opposites On The Traditional Political Spectrum? A Fear Of Censorship Due To PROTECT IP
Re: Re:
On the post: Washington Post Editorial Claims Piracy 'Costs' Companies Millions; Believes PROTECT IP Won't Be 'More Sweeping Than Necessary'
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
The article which Tim is commenting on is written from one side, using "facts" which aren't true, and again misses the point of why we do not like the Protect IP Act. It does however sound pretty much like a PR piece both the RIAA and MPAA wrote about why they support Protect IP.
On the post: Washington Post Editorial Claims Piracy 'Costs' Companies Millions; Believes PROTECT IP Won't Be 'More Sweeping Than Necessary'
Re: Re: Re: Answer to "Costs? Really?" -- Yes. If expenses aren't recovered...
Next >>