Because of the nature of her claim, IF she wins in a court of law and IMDB has to withdraw her age from their site, then it would all be in vain if she took them to court using her real name.
I'm not saying that I think the suit is right, just that the court is right to keep her identity 'hidden' until a ruling either way.
I would say that the public profile of this case is all that contains the "jane Doe" monicka, there are bound to be other records which contain her real name which cannot be released as yet as the outcome is unknown.
I see we have a new buzz word - non-story.
Unfortunately, if someone tells it or writes it, it's a story, maybe you don't agree with it or it's a bad story but it's still a story.
also, you forgot broadbrush, mike the pirate and the various other insults that are normally mandatory for these posts.
When I actually don't want to sound like someone I don't like, or do something I'll regret, generally I won't.
It's a lot easier to not do something than to do it - Remarkably, you've managed both with that first sentance.
Sounds to me like people will pay to be lazy, and isn't that how most industries are?
All I need to do now is find a very easy way of doing something that people don't normally like or can be bothered to do and sell it to them at a (not so)reasonable price...
If only there was a 'thinking machine' available to help me
A few questions (forgive me if I missed these in the post)
What happens if you just have a regular cell phone, not a 'smartphone'?
When they say search, are they allowed to delete anything (video for instance) that they find and don't like (for fear of it being used against them)?
Does this search include the memory card on your phone?
Are all officers now going to have to be trained on how to: firstly, establish what is a smartphone, and secondly, know how to operate all smartphones in existance? - Will they be wanting a payrise for this extra qualification?
My point exactly, rave reviews for allegedly rebelling against "the system". It's more conceivable, to me, that a bit of dissent resulted in better figures, so the big bosses actively encouraged it whilst publicly voicing against it to keep the pretence (and listener figures) up.
Is it not entirely possible that this fella broadcast this 'rant' at the request of ESPN, in the knowledge that controversy sells?
Are we really to believe that a company of ESPN's size would willingly keep on a DJ who openly slags off the bosses?
If it predicts political unrest as well as my local weather, prepare for some er, errors, mass panic.
I have a question for debate:
Would the prediction of political unrest go some way to causing it?
"But if inciting those are against the law, then we truly hopeless"
From another forums thread on the riots a few weeks back: http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1629846
The UK is not the US, but here in the US, inciting a riot is still illegal. It falls under clear and present danger. You can claim that inciting a riot is not what they were doing, but it would be disingenuous to attempt to claim inciting a riot does not present a clear and present danger to both property and life.
Again, the UK is not the US, and outside of generalities, I don't pretend to know what their laws say about it.
On the post: Actress Sues Amazon Because Her Age Appeared On Her IMDB Profile
Re: Maximising the Streisand effect
On the post: Actress Sues Amazon Because Her Age Appeared On Her IMDB Profile
Re:
On the post: Actress Sues Amazon Because Her Age Appeared On Her IMDB Profile
Re:
On the post: Actress Sues Amazon Because Her Age Appeared On Her IMDB Profile
Re:
I'm not saying that I think the suit is right, just that the court is right to keep her identity 'hidden' until a ruling either way.
I would say that the public profile of this case is all that contains the "jane Doe" monicka, there are bound to be other records which contain her real name which cannot be released as yet as the outcome is unknown.
On the post: Woman Sues Airline Over Flight Turbulence
On the post: US Postal Service Sends Postage Due Bill To Guy Who Put Block Party Invites Into Neighbors' Mailboxes
Re: The truth, who owns the mailbox
On the post: US Postal Service Sends Postage Due Bill To Guy Who Put Block Party Invites Into Neighbors' Mailboxes
Re:
Unfortunately, if someone tells it or writes it, it's a story, maybe you don't agree with it or it's a bad story but it's still a story.
also, you forgot broadbrush, mike the pirate and the various other insults that are normally mandatory for these posts.
On the post: If Your Estranged Wife Doesn't 'Like' Your Facebook Status, That's Not A Reason To Attack Her
Re:
It's a lot easier to not do something than to do it - Remarkably, you've managed both with that first sentance.
On the post: If Your Estranged Wife Doesn't 'Like' Your Facebook Status, That's Not A Reason To Attack Her
On the post: Publishers Realizing There's Revenue In Selling Ebooks Of Old Content... Even If It's Available For Free
All I need to do now is find a very easy way of doing something that people don't normally like or can be bothered to do and sell it to them at a (not so)reasonable price...
If only there was a 'thinking machine' available to help me
On the post: CA Governor Lets Police Search Your Smartphones At Traffic Stops
A few questions (forgive me if I missed these in the post)
When they say search, are they allowed to delete anything (video for instance) that they find and don't like (for fear of it being used against them)?
Does this search include the memory card on your phone?
Are all officers now going to have to be trained on how to: firstly, establish what is a smartphone, and secondly, know how to operate all smartphones in existance? - Will they be wanting a payrise for this extra qualification?
On the post: ESPN Affiliate Delays Podcasts; Announcer Rips Into His Bosses For Cluelessness
Re: Re: a set up?
On the post: ESPN Affiliate Delays Podcasts; Announcer Rips Into His Bosses For Cluelessness
a set up?
Are we really to believe that a company of ESPN's size would willingly keep on a DJ who openly slags off the bosses?
On the post: Could Computers Predict Political Unrest Like They Predict The Weather?
Re: Re: The Thomas theorem
On the post: Could Computers Predict Political Unrest Like They Predict The Weather?
Re: Re: Re: It's not like it takes any intelligence
Or:
Red sky at night, shepherds house on fire...
On the post: Time Warner Cable CEO Remains In Denial About Cord Cutting
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Could Computers Predict Political Unrest Like They Predict The Weather?
I have a question for debate:
Would the prediction of political unrest go some way to causing it?
On the post: Pretty Much Everything Related To You And Facebook Is Recorded In Your Facebook Permanent Record
Re: Re: Re: Facebook data request
On the post: University Police & Administration Freak Out Over Nathan Fillion Firefly Poster; Censor, Threaten Professor
Re: Re:
From another forums thread on the riots a few weeks back:
http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1629846
The UK is not the US, but here in the US, inciting a riot is still illegal. It falls under clear and present danger. You can claim that inciting a riot is not what they were doing, but it would be disingenuous to attempt to claim inciting a riot does not present a clear and present danger to both property and life.
Again, the UK is not the US, and outside of generalities, I don't pretend to know what their laws say about it.
On the post: University Police & Administration Freak Out Over Nathan Fillion Firefly Poster; Censor, Threaten Professor
Re: Re:
Next >>