It's why they settled out of court. Now it's merely an untried accusation, which they can minimize in the records. After enough time, they can pretend it never happened. No conviction, no offense.
Anything you say, or don't say. Anything you do, or don't do. Any way you look, or don't look. As we've seen here numerous times, cops can use ANYTHING as an excuse, be it the existence or non-existence of that anything.
Most likely response to the Judge's remarks is a shrug of their individual and collective shoulders.
Actually, I'd expect the most likely response to be complaints about this judge to the media, and an attempt by the union to get the judge removed from office. They're more likely to say this "proves" the judge's bias than to think they're in any way at fault.
One bonus to using DNS over HTTPS that I haven't seen mentioned is that it's faster resolving addresses. Given all the snooping and tracking regular DNS goes through, I had significant delays on address lookups that went away when I switched to encrypted DNS.
“We’ve gotten videos of racoons in the yard, with people saying, ‘Hey, can you deal with these racoons?’” he said. “That’s the type of people we’re dealing with. They’re constantly sending us video clips.”
"Hey, the HOA says my grass is too tall, as you can clearly see in the video. Please come and arrest it."
Except we constantly see stories here detailing how companies use several layers of shell companies to hide their payouts. Given the matter here, it's very easy to think that one of the PACs contributing to Hawley is a shell to a telecom group rather than him simply having a hate-boner on Google with no prompting from telecom. It's possible, yes, but far more likely, someone is paying him behind the scenes.
I could see the Chinese knowing about the NSA backdoors and using them for their own purposes. That doesn't make them Chinese backdoors. But it could be an excellent example of what happens when you have backdoors at all - ANYONE can take advantage of them.
Not a fundamental principle on the universe, more like all the money we've given to the telecoms, both directly and through tax breaks. The sheer amount they've been given should have gotten us 100% coverage several times over. Which is the "economic mechanism" that should provide the coverage - we've already paid them for it.
I think you're proving even Jews can be Nazis. Your grandparents went through something horrible. That doesn't give you a free pass to be an ass. You're the one spitting on what they endured.
Because everyone knows Disney WILL pay an expensive lawfirm to sue a broke school into the ground over their IP. They've done it plenty of times in the past, and will do so again in the future.
So 16 isn't enough? How many dead kids does it take before we acknowledge that people trying to domesticate vicious wolves into "cute" pets is a bad idea and a detriment to society?
Almost 60 kids drowned in bathtubs. How many dead kids does it take before we acknowledge that people trying to clean their dirty children is a bad idea and a detriment to society?
On the post: Police Department Shells Out $50,000 To Man After His Camera Catches Cops Fabricating Criminal Charges Against Him
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Should they? Probably. Will they? Almost certainly not.
On the post: Police Department Shells Out $50,000 To Man After His Camera Catches Cops Fabricating Criminal Charges Against Him
Re: Re:
It's why they settled out of court. Now it's merely an untried accusation, which they can minimize in the records. After enough time, they can pretend it never happened. No conviction, no offense.
On the post: Police Department Shells Out $50,000 To Man After His Camera Catches Cops Fabricating Criminal Charges Against Him
Re:
Now, now. Remember, it's not all cops, just that bad 99% making the other 1% look bad.
On the post: Coronavirus Telecommuting To Further Highlight Shoddy US Telecom Market
Sign me up!
Currently, I'm working as a server at Waffle House. As such, I look forward to being able to telecommute. It will make my job so much easier.
;)
On the post: Court Tells Cop That A Person Invoking Their Rights Isn't Suspicious Behavior
Re: Re:
No, I'm sure you'd get fired from MacDonald's for making Whoppers since Burger King would probably sue. ;)
On the post: Court Tells Cop That A Person Invoking Their Rights Isn't Suspicious Behavior
Re: Re:
Anything you say, or don't say. Anything you do, or don't do. Any way you look, or don't look. As we've seen here numerous times, cops can use ANYTHING as an excuse, be it the existence or non-existence of that anything.
On the post: Judge Tears Into Cops For Beating A Man Who Dared To Question Their Words And Actions
Re: Re: A refreshing breeze in a sea of rot
Actually, I'd expect the most likely response to be complaints about this judge to the media, and an attempt by the union to get the judge removed from office. They're more likely to say this "proves" the judge's bias than to think they're in any way at fault.
On the post: Hoping To Combat ISP Snooping, Mozilla Enables Encrypted DNS
Bonus
One bonus to using DNS over HTTPS that I haven't seen mentioned is that it's faster resolving addresses. Given all the snooping and tracking regular DNS goes through, I had significant delays on address lookups that went away when I switched to encrypted DNS.
On the post: Ring Says It Helps Cops Fight Crime But The Data Shows It's No Better At This Than Any Other Security Camera
End result
"Hey, the HOA says my grass is too tall, as you can clearly see in the video. Please come and arrest it."
On the post: Surprise! MIT Study Claims Voatz E-Voting Technology Is A Security Dumpster Fire
Re:
There's no such thing as wing meat. Wings are just skin and bone. :)
On the post: Surprise! MIT Study Claims Voatz E-Voting Technology Is A Security Dumpster Fire
Award for Least Surprising Surprise
The article title is funny because it's not in the least bit surprising. Surprising would have been if it HADN'T been a dumpster fire.
On the post: Why Do Josh Hawley's Cures For 'Big Tech' Always Oddly Omit 'Big Telecom'?
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Except we constantly see stories here detailing how companies use several layers of shell companies to hide their payouts. Given the matter here, it's very easy to think that one of the PACs contributing to Hawley is a shell to a telecom group rather than him simply having a hate-boner on Google with no prompting from telecom. It's possible, yes, but far more likely, someone is paying him behind the scenes.
On the post: US Takes Baby Steps Toward Providing Actual Public Evidence Of Huawei Spying
Re:
I could see the Chinese knowing about the NSA backdoors and using them for their own purposes. That doesn't make them Chinese backdoors. But it could be an excellent example of what happens when you have backdoors at all - ANYONE can take advantage of them.
On the post: Why Do Josh Hawley's Cures For 'Big Tech' Always Oddly Omit 'Big Telecom'?
Re: Re:
That just means it's better hidden.
On the post: US Broadband Gaps Are Twice As Bad As The Government Claims
Re: 100% coverage
Not a fundamental principle on the universe, more like all the money we've given to the telecoms, both directly and through tax breaks. The sheer amount they've been given should have gotten us 100% coverage several times over. Which is the "economic mechanism" that should provide the coverage - we've already paid them for it.
On the post: iPhones Will Get Bigger And More Expensive This Year Thanks To 5G
Re:
The new 5G iPhone:
https://cnet3.cbsistatic.com/img/7n63PXWt8-ZO1Y7YRXX0hcPf_hM=/868x488/2018/03/28/03f5d952-0c cb-4a2c-bd28-597db4c0985f/24-ipad-2018-education.jpg
;)
On the post: Federal Court Ignores Journalist Privilege For Reporting On Court Documents; Allows Bullshit Defamation Suit To Proceed
Butt-hurt
Butowsky? More like Butt-ow-sky.
On the post: Disney's Licensing Dogs Charge Underserved School District A Third Of Fundraiser Money For Playing 'Lion King' DVD
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Disney's Side
I think you're proving even Jews can be Nazis. Your grandparents went through something horrible. That doesn't give you a free pass to be an ass. You're the one spitting on what they endured.
On the post: Disney's Licensing Dogs Charge Underserved School District A Third Of Fundraiser Money For Playing 'Lion King' DVD
Re: Why did they pay?
Because everyone knows Disney WILL pay an expensive lawfirm to sue a broke school into the ground over their IP. They've done it plenty of times in the past, and will do so again in the future.
On the post: Court To Cop: We Don't Need On-Point Precedent To Deny You Immunity For Killing A Dog That Couldn't Hurt You
Re: Re: Re:
Almost 60 kids drowned in bathtubs. How many dead kids does it take before we acknowledge that people trying to clean their dirty children is a bad idea and a detriment to society?
Next >>