Yeah, all right. But you still failed to answer the question. Who would you fire? The person who goofs off for 2 hours but does more work, or the person who works for 8 hours? You aren't getting the point. At all.
So, wait... Because it deals with feminism and feminist issues (as opposed to steamy sex scenes, like 'chick lit') it's automatically chick lit? Are you that stupid? Really?
as Fedex is a private company, it could snoop through your packages all it wants to, < \/>
Well, no, they really couldn't. There are privacy concerns there, already. It isn't a violation of the 4th Amm, but it certainly would be against the law.
Not speaking up is part of the problem in this world. People are NOT standing up for themselves, anonymously or not, and that is a huge issue. I do not believe that 'if it'll get you fired you shouldn't say it' is a valid response, but ridiculing someone for not wanting to lose their job during a recession, or any other time, just because you wouldn't do it yourself is a bit over the top.
Yes, because your newly minted balls will be a great help while on the dole, won't they? That'll show 'em, yessirreebob! Or when you're in the hospital with a broken face from a violent repercussion to your speech. Etcetera. You make the mistake of assuming that someone is weak or cowardly because they don't give a name instead of wondering what their reasons might be.
I think you mean 'If you don't have anything NICE to say, don't say anything at all.' It's all bullshit, anyways. If we all did that, the world would be flat, boring, and lacking of the loveable curmudgeons that entertain us from day to day. Like darryl.
Nope, not a clue what you're railing about. Provide a link, if you would. Of course you won't, that's beneath you, but it's worth the shot.
Now, as for pharma? They're more in the marketing business these days. How many of these 'new' (yeah, funny, none of them are NEW) drugs do you think they actually researched? My bet is less than 90%.
On the post: No, Angry Birds Is Not Costing $1.5 Billion In Lost Productivity
Re:
On the post: No, Angry Birds Is Not Costing $1.5 Billion In Lost Productivity
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: No, Angry Birds Is Not Costing $1.5 Billion In Lost Productivity
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Igor, throw the lever!
On the post: If Google's Upstart Competitors Aren't Afraid Of Google, Why Is Washington Upset?
Re: MS Lawsuit
Can you give some examples of this superior technology? Honestly, I haven't heard of it. I KNOW you aren't talking about OS/2 or AmiDOS.
On the post: Author Dumps Publisher At Book Launch Party
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Is Yahoo Blocking People From Sending Any Email That Mentions OccupyWallSt.org?
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Well, no, they really couldn't. There are privacy concerns there, already. It isn't a violation of the 4th Amm, but it certainly would be against the law.
On the post: Patent Trolls Cost The Economy Half A Trillion Dollars
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Puerto 80 Explains How Rojadirecta Domain Seizures Violated The First Amendment
Re: Yeah, but any yahoo can also make money off infringement.
You tell me, Patty_Cake. You can't use out_of_the_blue, anymore, because we said so. You're now Patty_Cake.
On the post: Lawyer Wants To Wipe Out Anonymous Speech If It's Critical Of Someone
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Entertainment Industry's Coordinated Effort To Blame Third Parties Taking Shape
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Entertainment Industry's Coordinated Effort To Blame Third Parties Taking Shape
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Entertainment Industry's Coordinated Effort To Blame Third Parties Taking Shape
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Crazy Coincidence, Plagiarism, Or An Obvious Idea For An Electric Car Ad?
Re: Need text links
Renault ZE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKg-LPOXIMs
Mitsubishi i-Miev: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1FWJu_Co7Q
On the post: Lawyer Wants To Wipe Out Anonymous Speech If It's Critical Of Someone
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Lawyer Wants To Wipe Out Anonymous Speech If It's Critical Of Someone
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Lawyer Wants To Wipe Out Anonymous Speech If It's Critical Of Someone
Re: If you don't have anything to say...
On the post: Shouldn't Unilateral Retroactive Copyright Extension Mean Copyright Is Void?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Who broke what contract?
Can we start with you, first? It would do the world much good.
On the post: Shouldn't Unilateral Retroactive Copyright Extension Mean Copyright Is Void?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Me and everybody else ..
You really don't understand how Mike approaches that, do you?
On the post: How Payola Works Today... Or Why You Only Hear Major Label Songs On The Radio
Re: Google forcing Dutch Royal Library to fight piracy
On the post: Patent Reform Official, Along With More Bad Ideas
Re: The Four P's
Now, as for pharma? They're more in the marketing business these days. How many of these 'new' (yeah, funny, none of them are NEW) drugs do you think they actually researched? My bet is less than 90%.
Next >>