so, if the studios own the content, how can it be stolen? according to you copytards every infringing copy is a lost sale, and theft, but you just asserted the fact that the studios own it, and they do own it.
the copy of Avengers I have has no bearing on the 35mm print in some studio's vault.
you just got lost in your own circular thinking, funny.
so, above you claim 'When you don't own the content you don't get to dictate how someone else gives it to you.', then you go on to state 'What harm to you if you can't legally obtain the limited home video license to a movie you want?'. so which is it copytard? do you own it or pay for a limited home video license.
this is the kind of thinking that has millions disrespecting your government provided monopoly.
wa wa wa, fuck you and your distribution ethics. If you don't want to deliver, I don't want to pay. deal with it.
I have been using the internet for my entertainment source for over 10 years now (no satellite, cable or other shit distribution), with FIOS even. usenet, ISP and VPN providers get my money now, bypassing your distribution bullshit. the internet has perfected distribution over the last 10 years, probably what your all bitchy about, competition.
unless of course, you have controlled your online exposure since the inception of the intertubez. no linked in, no facebook, twitter, myspace.
and when I blog its under psuedoname, and done by VPN via proxy.
There are some of us out there that actually DO know how to be truly anonymous online. and irrelevant of the laws you put in place, I will always maintain my anonymity.
are you sure that file was infringing? is it more like you don't understand how links work, and how to find out who is actually, physically, hosting the file in question? did you cavity search the file to ensure it was infringing? were there other files in close approximation? what were their names?
I'm not completely convinced that file was infringing unless you can prove otherwise.
actually, this is all starting to become enjoyable. to sit and read all the MAFIAA troll comments here on Techdirt. I wondered what the sub-conscience draw was..
For an industry as large as you 'claim', isn't it a bit ironic that it has come to the realization that you have to defend your obnoxious lies in a popular blog, in a vain attempt to incite blind support for your idiotic views on copyright? There are 7 billion people on the planet, and 1.26 billion of them on the internet. With probably
half not knowing a thing about copyright (or caring), and the other half enlightened by your education campaign of how bad copyright is, I can only conclude that over 600 million people on the planet can prove every copyright claim as lies, compared to your 224,000 employees in IP intensive industries.
Interestingly, there are over 2,800 informed people against copyright to one troll who is for copyright.
Now please leave, so the grown-ups can have a discussion of how to dismantle your government monopoly, without your input. Fair is fair, consumers weren't allowed at the table for SOPA/PIPA/ACTA/TPP, why should we allow you in the discussion on how to dismantle your monopoly?
and as you continuously condemn any argument as falsehoods, I will continue to ignore your outright lies, and continue my filthy pirating ways.
I like how you continue attempting to impress me, and get me to change my pirating ways by stealing from the public domain and stealing from the content creators, all in the name of your perverted view of the Constitution.
When truth, realism, legitimate terms and equity are part of copyright again, I will dis-continue to share your booty for free to offset to immense damage you cause.
actually, it's not. I encrypt my traffic, and I am a filthy pirate. We filthy pirates have been training other filthy pirates on how to circumvent your incredibly expensive laws with free tools for a decade now. I myself have taught at least 50 filthy pirates how to evade your non-technical irrelevancy for over 10 years now.
So, I would say, it IS safe to say that an increase in encrypted traffic is surely file sharing, what are you going to do now, outlaw encryption?
On the post: Google's Fiber Makes MPAA Skittish. Why Does Hollywood See All Technology In Terms Of Piracy?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @Anonymous Coward
the copy of Avengers I have has no bearing on the 35mm print in some studio's vault.
you just got lost in your own circular thinking, funny.
On the post: Google's Fiber Makes MPAA Skittish. Why Does Hollywood See All Technology In Terms Of Piracy?
Re: Re: Re: @Anonymous Coward
this is the kind of thinking that has millions disrespecting your government provided monopoly.
On the post: Google's Fiber Makes MPAA Skittish. Why Does Hollywood See All Technology In Terms Of Piracy?
Re: Re: Re: @Anonymous Coward
the intertubez distribute your crap regardless of your opinion or desire. if you don't want your shit distributed, then keep it, nobody will miss it.
On the post: Google's Fiber Makes MPAA Skittish. Why Does Hollywood See All Technology In Terms Of Piracy?
Re: Re: Re: @Anonymous Coward
I have been using the internet for my entertainment source for over 10 years now (no satellite, cable or other shit distribution), with FIOS even. usenet, ISP and VPN providers get my money now, bypassing your distribution bullshit. the internet has perfected distribution over the last 10 years, probably what your all bitchy about, competition.
and its not illegal its infringing you copytard.
On the post: Law Professor: Megaupload Prosecution A 'Depressing Display Of Abuse Of Government Authority'
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Australian Government Plans To Continue Holding Secret Anti-Piracy 'Stakeholder' Meetings With Industry; No Consumer Advocates Allowed
Dyslexia
On the post: Australian Government Plans To Continue Holding Secret Anti-Piracy 'Stakeholder' Meetings With Industry; No Consumer Advocates Allowed
Re: Re: Re: Contact the Attorney General
I would not wipe the sweat from my balls to save your life if you were dying of thirst in the desert.
*slap*
On the post: Australian Government Plans To Continue Holding Secret Anti-Piracy 'Stakeholder' Meetings With Industry; No Consumer Advocates Allowed
Re: representation
by your own logic, can I represent you at your 'will hearing'?, I'll be sure and keep your best interests at heart.
Better yet, just send me all your banking information, and I will be sure and start representing you right away.
On the post: Too Much Copyright: This Generation's Prohibition
true anon
and when I blog its under psuedoname, and done by VPN via proxy.
There are some of us out there that actually DO know how to be truly anonymous online. and irrelevant of the laws you put in place, I will always maintain my anonymity.
-surfer
On the post: Hollywood Loses Its Big Copyright Lawsuit Against ISP iiNet Down Under
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Court Says Dutch Anti-Piracy Organization Overreached; Won't Shut Down Pirate Party Proxy Site
Re: Infringing File
I'm not completely convinced that file was infringing unless you can prove otherwise.
On the post: Ridiculous White House Report Pretends Getting Copyrights, Patents & Trademarks Means You Benefit From Them
Re: Re: Re:
Here are just two for you, Furniture and Fashion. Ding, you lose.
On the post: CISPA Authors Launch Twitter Account To Preach False Merits Of The Bill
Re:
On the post: MPAA Just Won't Quit: Jumps Into Legal Dispute To Argue Links & Embeds Are Infringing
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Pitiful? No, it's a nuanced point.
On the post: How Can You Be Register Of Copyrights If You Don't Even Understand Copyright's Most Basic Purpose?
fun
For an industry as large as you 'claim', isn't it a bit ironic that it has come to the realization that you have to defend your obnoxious lies in a popular blog, in a vain attempt to incite blind support for your idiotic views on copyright? There are 7 billion people on the planet, and 1.26 billion of them on the internet. With probably
half not knowing a thing about copyright (or caring), and the other half enlightened by your education campaign of how bad copyright is, I can only conclude that over 600 million people on the planet can prove every copyright claim as lies, compared to your 224,000 employees in IP intensive industries.
Interestingly, there are over 2,800 informed people against copyright to one troll who is for copyright.
Now please leave, so the grown-ups can have a discussion of how to dismantle your government monopoly, without your input. Fair is fair, consumers weren't allowed at the table for SOPA/PIPA/ACTA/TPP, why should we allow you in the discussion on how to dismantle your monopoly?
On the post: How Can You Be Register Of Copyrights If You Don't Even Understand Copyright's Most Basic Purpose?
Re:
I like how you continue attempting to impress me, and get me to change my pirating ways by stealing from the public domain and stealing from the content creators, all in the name of your perverted view of the Constitution.
When truth, realism, legitimate terms and equity are part of copyright again, I will dis-continue to share your booty for free to offset to immense damage you cause.
On the post: Hadopi Accused Of 'Massaging' The Numbers To Make Anti-Piracy Activity Look Better
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
So, I would say, it IS safe to say that an increase in encrypted traffic is surely file sharing, what are you going to do now, outlaw encryption?
BUA-AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA, foolish copyright maxamilist...
On the post: MPAA Says Letting Anyone Access Data On Megaupload Servers Would Represent Infringement
Re: theres precedent
On the post: Court Says BitTorrent Users Connected To The Same Swarm Are Not Involved In Any 'Conspiracy'
my bad
On the post: Court Says BitTorrent Users Connected To The Same Swarm Are Not Involved In Any 'Conspiracy'
Re: I wonder
how dare the Judicial Branch have opinions of law without consulting the MAFIAA first
Next >>