You seem ignorant of the fact that content id does not police all content nor is it 100% accurate. Further, the three strikes clause is problematic in actually reviewing fair use claims. So again, I ask you... How does Youtube actively police all of the data to ensure no data is infringing?
Every US site I've ever seen already polices their forums themselves as part of their DMCA compliance.
Please explain how Youtube polices new content being uploaded every minute with a fine toothed comb. How are there enough man hours to figure out what's infringing and what isn't infringing?
Kind of hard to support Rule 65 when NOTHING helped out dajaz1. Why don't you answer exactly how the government spectacularly failed in following the law for a full year on a website?
The "strategic use" is nothing else but enforcement of the law. All laws.
So... All laws inherently must be enforced regardless of problems they won't provably solved. Is that your argument?
Care to explain the imaginary nuance in the law that says it's ok to block child porn on the internet but not other illegal acts on the internet?
I find it funny how you insist on censorship and hide behind the strawman argument of CP. So let's ask this:
If Mogis, an organization helping adult people who were abused as children, is outspoken about censorship, why should I believe your assertion that we need to have copyright or CP police?
Here's some better questions for you:
How are you helping the ones abused by putting your fingers in your ears and saying "Na na na, can't hear or see you?"
How will this catch the criminals that upload CP?
How will this pay for the emotional damages of those that have been abused?
How will DNS blocking actually do anything that you believe it can achieve?
Go ahead, I await your disingenuous statement believing DNS blocking will accomplish anything other than scurrying the abusers like roaches to do this again and again while supporting censorship that will be ineffective.
I spoke in 2007 of how child pornography was being used as a strategic excuse by the copyright lobby to create a battering ram against our fundamental liberties, even if it hurts children (which they don’t care about).
Care to explain how CP suddenly came up as a topic here, such that you want to take away civil liberties for the sake of false security?
Piracy has killed the movie industry? Tell that to the CEOs that make more money than most of their employees, who work so hard for so little return in comparison.
Those reports are bogus and you need to learn how to link. Put up or shut up. Otherwise, you're full of shit more than the vague guy from a few weeks ago.
The military was created to attack the enemies of the state.
The police were created to protect and serve the people.
What we are seeing here is the mixture of the two.
You now have the military acting as the police. When that happens the military will tend to think that the enemy is the people it's supposed to protect.
I can't think of any way that this passes Constitutional muster. If it actually passes as a law, expect a lot of resistance to this law.
On the post: Apparently Congress Wants To Pretend No One Is Really That Concerned About SOPA
Re:
On the post: Lamar Smith Proposes New Version Of SOPA, With Just A Few Changes
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Lamar Smith Proposes New Version Of SOPA, With Just A Few Changes
Re: Re: Re:
Please explain how Youtube polices new content being uploaded every minute with a fine toothed comb. How are there enough man hours to figure out what's infringing and what isn't infringing?
On the post: Apparently Congress Wants To Pretend No One Is Really That Concerned About SOPA
Re:
Who is actually supporting this other than a few people that are affiliated with the movie and music industry?
On the post: The Very Real Risk Of Overly Broad Censorship Under SOPA
Re: Re:
On the post: The Very Real Risk Of Overly Broad Censorship Under SOPA
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Lamar Smith Proposes New Version Of SOPA, With Just A Few Changes
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
So... All laws inherently must be enforced regardless of problems they won't provably solved. Is that your argument?
Care to explain the imaginary nuance in the law that says it's ok to block child porn on the internet but not other illegal acts on the internet?
I find it funny how you insist on censorship and hide behind the strawman argument of CP. So let's ask this:
If Mogis, an organization helping adult people who were abused as children, is outspoken about censorship, why should I believe your assertion that we need to have copyright or CP police?
Here's some better questions for you:
How are you helping the ones abused by putting your fingers in your ears and saying "Na na na, can't hear or see you?"
How will this catch the criminals that upload CP?
How will this pay for the emotional damages of those that have been abused?
How will DNS blocking actually do anything that you believe it can achieve?
Go ahead, I await your disingenuous statement believing DNS blocking will accomplish anything other than scurrying the abusers like roaches to do this again and again while supporting censorship that will be ineffective.
On the post: 96% of Congressmen Agree: Bad Legislation Is Easier To Craft In Secret
Re: Re: Chilling effects
On the post: Lamar Smith Proposes New Version Of SOPA, With Just A Few Changes
Re: Re: Re:
Amazing... Simply amazing. Rick was right in 2007
Care to explain how CP suddenly came up as a topic here, such that you want to take away civil liberties for the sake of false security?
On the post: Congressional Research Service Shows Hollywood Is Thriving
So...
On the post: HADOPI Wants To Research File Downloads: Shouldn't It Have Done That First?
Re:
Recorded music sales during the "boom"- $15 billion
So, of the $8 billion in sales, do you honestly believe that all of that money is lost thanks to piracy?
On the post: HADOPI Wants To Research File Downloads: Shouldn't It Have Done That First?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: HADOPI Wants To Research File Downloads: Shouldn't It Have Done That First?
Re: Re: Re:
The rogue site problem is a fabricated one.
On the post: 96% of Congressmen Agree: Bad Legislation Is Easier To Craft In Secret
Chilling effects
The police were created to protect and serve the people.
What we are seeing here is the mixture of the two.
You now have the military acting as the police. When that happens the military will tend to think that the enemy is the people it's supposed to protect.
I can't think of any way that this passes Constitutional muster. If it actually passes as a law, expect a lot of resistance to this law.
On the post: Congressional Investigations Into Dajaz1.com Censorship Begin
Can someone please tell Wyden about this?
On the post: HADOPI Wants To Research File Downloads: Shouldn't It Have Done That First?
Re:
On the post: HADOPI Wants To Research File Downloads: Shouldn't It Have Done That First?
Re:
On the post: Rupert Murdoch Personally Lobbies Congress For SOPA And PROTECT IP
Re:
On the post: The Good And The Bad Of The New OPEN Bill From Wyden And Issa
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: EFF Agrees That Copyright In Second Life Is A Mess
Re: Re:
You are talking about a comment left two years ago. I doubt anyone is going to look at this when there's updated information.
Next >>