Prince Charming: You! You can't lie! So tell me puppet... where... is... he? Pinocchio: Uh. Hmm, well, uh, I don't know where he's not Prince Charming: You're telling me you don't know where he is? Pinocchio: It wouldn't be inaccurate to assume that I couldn't exactly not say that it is or isn't almost partially incorrect. Prince Charming: So you do know where he is! Pinocchio: On the contrary. I'm possibly more or less not definitely rejecting the idea that in no way with any amount of uncertainty that I undeniably Prince Charming: Stop it! Pinocchio: ...do or do not know where he shouldn't probably be, if that indeed wasn't where he isn't. Even if he wasn't at where I knew he was Pinocchio: That'd mean I'd really have to know where he wasn't.
So you agree that's what's happening there? Or do you still claim that because the book says it's legal and not technically "abuse", it's all hunky-dory?
So, a person who illegally downloads a movie is just like someone who murders or robs a bank? Please.
Irrelevant. You said "By definition, the people who infringe on other people's rights under copyright laws are the abusers of the law". The same definition should apply to all laws. Or do they teach you in law school that copyright laws are all-important while other laws are OK to break?
"Let them eat cake" is the traditional translation of the French phrase "Qu'ils mangent de la brioche", supposedly said by a French princess upon learning that the peasants had no bread. As brioche is a luxury bread enriched with eggs and butter, it would reflect the princess's obliviousness to the nature of a famine.
Although commonly attributed to Queen Marie Antoinette, there is no record of these words ever having been uttered by her; they first appear in Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Confessions, his putative autobiographical work (completed in 1769, when Marie Antoinette was 13).
(And yes, it's wikipedia. And yes, it also cites references).
On the post: Debbie Does BitTorrent: 113 Sued For Sharing Classic Porn Movie
Re: Re: Re:
Pinocchio: Uh. Hmm, well, uh, I don't know where he's not
Prince Charming: You're telling me you don't know where he is?
Pinocchio: It wouldn't be inaccurate to assume that I couldn't exactly not say that it is or isn't almost partially incorrect.
Prince Charming: So you do know where he is!
Pinocchio: On the contrary. I'm possibly more or less not definitely rejecting the idea that in no way with any amount of uncertainty that I undeniably
Prince Charming: Stop it!
Pinocchio: ...do or do not know where he shouldn't probably be, if that indeed wasn't where he isn't. Even if he wasn't at where I knew he was
Pinocchio: That'd mean I'd really have to know where he wasn't.
On the post: Debbie Does BitTorrent: 113 Sued For Sharing Classic Porn Movie
Re: Re:
On the post: Debbie Does BitTorrent: 113 Sued For Sharing Classic Porn Movie
Re: Re:
On the post: Debbie Does BitTorrent: 113 Sued For Sharing Classic Porn Movie
Re: Re: i agree with Mike
On the post: Debbie Does BitTorrent: 113 Sued For Sharing Classic Porn Movie
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Debbie Does BitTorrent: 113 Sued For Sharing Classic Porn Movie
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
"My question to you is...If you discover that someone you are suing is innocent, will you pay all of their legal fees?"
Here's a hint, there's a key in your keyboard, it says "page up".
On the post: Debbie Does BitTorrent: 113 Sued For Sharing Classic Porn Movie
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Average_joe shown to fail the 8th grade education standard:
On the post: Debbie Does BitTorrent: 113 Sued For Sharing Classic Porn Movie
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Debbie Does BitTorrent: 113 Sued For Sharing Classic Porn Movie
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Debbie Does BitTorrent: 113 Sued For Sharing Classic Porn Movie
Re: Re: Re:
Irrelevant. You said "By definition, the people who infringe on other people's rights under copyright laws are the abusers of the law". The same definition should apply to all laws. Or do they teach you in law school that copyright laws are all-important while other laws are OK to break?
On the post: Debbie Does BitTorrent: 113 Sued For Sharing Classic Porn Movie
Re:
She was so abusive!
On the post: French ISPs Pushing Back Against Hadopi; Threaten To Ignore Requests
Re: Re: Re: @ 3 and 4
"Let them eat cake" is the traditional translation of the French phrase "Qu'ils mangent de la brioche", supposedly said by a French princess upon learning that the peasants had no bread. As brioche is a luxury bread enriched with eggs and butter, it would reflect the princess's obliviousness to the nature of a famine.
Although commonly attributed to Queen Marie Antoinette, there is no record of these words ever having been uttered by her; they first appear in Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Confessions, his putative autobiographical work (completed in 1769, when Marie Antoinette was 13).
(And yes, it's wikipedia. And yes, it also cites references).
So yeah, it's all a big fat lie. Like cake.
On the post: French ISPs Pushing Back Against Hadopi; Threaten To Ignore Requests
Re: Re: Re: Re: @1 the law is already happened
the cake is a lie!
On the post: Huge Push In Brazil To Legalize File Sharing
Re: Re: and ill add
On the post: Lawyer Ranking Site Avvo Sued By Another Upset Lawyer
Re:
On the post: Lawyer Ranking Site Avvo Sued By Another Upset Lawyer
On the post: Scammers Sending Out Notices Pretending To Be From HADOPI, Demanding Money For Infringement
Re: What?
On the post: Microsoft's Patent On Fast Shutdowns Shows Why Windows Is So Slow To Shut Down
Re: Patents are not products,, but you should know that right !!!
On the post: Microsoft's Patent On Fast Shutdowns Shows Why Windows Is So Slow To Shut Down
Re: Re: grr
On the post: Lawyer Tries Selling DIY Legal Response Kit For Those Hit By US Copyright Group Suits
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Next >>