That there is concrete articulable activity linked to the subject to nominate them to the selecte and no-fly list for their use of fear to manipulate government policy.
"...it seems like Holder's real reason to declare "state secrets" had little to do with "national security" and a hell of a lot to do with "DOJ security" in keeping its illegal and unconstitutional practices from further public and judicial scrutiny."
.gov guidelines are about as revelational as the ending of a Friday the 13th movie.
When the bag is scanned, that you checked on that flight to wherever, they pull it off the line and pull all of your shit out and go through it. Then they throw back everything they don't want to steal with a little note that says, "hey we went through all of your stuff so suck it citizen. because, TERROISIM!!! the TSA.
"With this evidence I hope a mistrial is declared."
Silly citizen, "this evidence" was presented at his TRIAL. It is what got him CONVICTED. The fact the it was an FBI plot all along to catch a Muslim "Terrorist" was known to the Judge and Jury, and they did what nearly every other "reasonable person" would do. They CONVICTED him of a crime that the government invented to "protect" us from terroists.
The DOJ, local cops, state police, FBI, the entire machine, is there to CONVICT people of crimes. Not to protect anyone. The sooner We The People figure this out the better off we will all be.
"OK, I'm often first in line to bash the cops, and this conduct looks way over the line..." DD: Listen here pal 'o mine you aint seen any line crossing yet, my cousin Patrolman Peter Dickwad was just getting warmed up and remembered how much he hates it when his Grande® skinny half-caff extra hot latte gets cold so he took a break to go finish it.
"… but can we dial the sensationalism down a bit?" DD: This I actually agree with, don't make us come over there and make you stop typing.
"Given the privacy protections, the only way to get the medical records is a warrant, and we'd all (me included) be complaining if the hospital had handed them over without due process of law." DD: Bullcrap. Hogwash! Have none of you bootlicking pleebs heard of exigent circumstances? This crap got splashed all over the web and you sissys got your panties in a wad about a couple of good right crosses. So naturally I would have just gone over there and gotten the records with me and my SWAT team buddies (we are all on the SWAT team by the way, just part time and it effing ROCKS!) and taken down that location before those sniveling doctors and stuff destroyed evidence!
"The proper legal language verb for what is done with a warrant is "seize". I believe you'll find it in, oh yes, the Fourth Amendment: "...particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."" DD: And I don’t give two farts what the proper term is if I want it I'll sieze it by any means necessary, like if I got to sieze your neck until you die to get it, whatever "It" is.
"'Why the CHP would need to seize the records, rather than just view them, is completely inexplicable.' Er, no -- I just explained that. If the CHP showed up at the hospital and said "Hi -- we'd like to look at patient Jane's records", there's only one acceptable response by the hospital: "Come back with a warrant." So, they did." DD: Irrelevant, don't matter, NEXT!
"'The person served the warrant noted that it was issued to grab "property or things" as part of a felony investigation, which apparently included communications with her doctor about her well-being and "references to her attorney."'" DD: and they better do like my prom date and "give it up" or there gonna' get what's coming to them next!
"For all we know the felony under investigation is the cop's conduct -- I'd like to think so." DD: Trust me I asked Patrolman Peter about this It's not about him, she's going down for this stunt she pulled. Hard!
"tldr: Yes, please report, please even editorialize, but don't sensationalize -- it just kills credibility." DD: You are so deluded! You want to know what really kills credibility? Not being a COP! Suk that "citizen"!
Now I know why my job application was denied there...
"...employees routinely passed around pictures they had intercepted of "extremely attractive" people who were naked..."
None of the folks I was going to work with wanted me there as they knew (due to the warrantless mass surveilance of my internet porn viewing so they could use it to embarass high profile targets the rest of the world cares about) I'd be passing around the intercepted pics and videos of the "extremely un-attractive" people too!
And I just though the government just really cared. How sad.
As the one woman involved, I really am embarrased. I thought it was curious that he cupped my womanhood so gently and held me after. It was so encouraging that now I thought to my self... "Frau Blücher, finally the govenrment cares about not only your safety from evil terrorists, but wants you to feel loved as well!"
It was such a hearwarming experience that I actually got in line again to be "re-screened", I even changed my blouse so that nice young gentelman would not recognize me and I might get held again by the loving federal agent.
Finally after we "finished" the second time, I thought I detected something akin to The Reinheitsgebot on his breath and just imagined that those nice TSA agents are just so well trained not to let their love shine through and are required to act like the Geheime Staatspolizei, you provincials usually call them "The Gestapo", that finally with a hearty breakfast of small beer in him to warm not just his belly but also his heart, that I too finally came and came to love the TSA as much as they love all of us.
I'd have believed it also if his opener was instead...
...As I type these words, slamming down my 10th straight $9 a jug at the drugstore vodka, I have to take on faith that the Washington D.C. police, the FBI, the DEA, and the Secret Service are not raiding my house, and if they were there is not a damn thing anyone would be able to do about it and I'd be confident with parallel construction I'd be totally fucked, actually, sincerly, totally from behind, fucked once I'd landed in the federal penn...
637 days from the initial invasion on March 10, 1940 until December 7, 1941 when the US declared war on the Axis powers. However one could argue that it was much sooner than that with politically unpopular efforts like Lend-Lease which began officially on March 11, 1941.
"With limited exceptions (for example, in an emergency), our intelligence agencies must have a court order from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to target any U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident..."
As ther eare a limited number of "U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents" It wiould seem they are telling the truth.
Just spy on everyone and the "Limited Exceptions" are limited to the number of US persons and legal residents.
I have no idea what everyone is so worked up about, seems reasonable to me.
On the post: Andrew Cuomo Investigated For Corruption In Blocking Investigations Into Corruption
It would seem
Anyone want to second the motion?
On the post: Why Was The DOJ So Fearful Of Its Terrorist Watchlist Guidelines Being Made Public?
this revelation...
.gov guidelines are about as revelational as the ending of a Friday the 13th movie.
Shame on them!
On the post: Revealed: What Kind Of 'Extra Scrutiny' The Government Gives To Folks On The Terrorist Watchlist
Re: How?
When the bag is scanned, that you checked on that flight to wherever, they pull it off the line and pull all of your shit out and go through it. Then they throw back everything they don't want to steal with a little note that says, "hey we went through all of your stuff so suck it citizen. because, TERROISIM!!! the TSA.
On the post: Report: All But Four Of The High-Profile Domestic Terrorism Plots In The Last Decade Were Crafted From The Ground Up By The FBI
Re:
Silly citizen, "this evidence" was presented at his TRIAL. It is what got him CONVICTED. The fact the it was an FBI plot all along to catch a Muslim "Terrorist" was known to the Judge and Jury, and they did what nearly every other "reasonable person" would do. They CONVICTED him of a crime that the government invented to "protect" us from terroists.
The DOJ, local cops, state police, FBI, the entire machine, is there to CONVICT people of crimes. Not to protect anyone. The sooner We The People figure this out the better off we will all be.
On the post: Judge's Overly Broad Discovery Order About Online Critics Allows Ubervita To Bully More Authors Of Critical Reviews
Re: Good writing
On the post: California Highway Patrol Seizes Medical Records Of Woman An Officer Was Caught On Tape Beating
Re:
Dipstick "citizens' who don't know their place, with cameras, make us good cops look bad.
Idiots.
On the post: California Highway Patrol Seizes Medical Records Of Woman An Officer Was Caught On Tape Beating
Re:
DD: Listen here pal 'o mine you aint seen any line crossing yet, my cousin Patrolman Peter Dickwad was just getting warmed up and remembered how much he hates it when his Grande® skinny half-caff extra hot latte gets cold so he took a break to go finish it.
"… but can we dial the sensationalism down a bit?"
DD: This I actually agree with, don't make us come over there and make you stop typing.
"Given the privacy protections, the only way to get the medical records is a warrant, and we'd all (me included) be complaining if the hospital had handed them over without due process of law."
DD: Bullcrap. Hogwash! Have none of you bootlicking pleebs heard of exigent circumstances? This crap got splashed all over the web and you sissys got your panties in a wad about a couple of good right crosses. So naturally I would have just gone over there and gotten the records with me and my SWAT team buddies (we are all on the SWAT team by the way, just part time and it effing ROCKS!) and taken down that location before those sniveling doctors and stuff destroyed evidence!
"The proper legal language verb for what is done with a warrant is "seize". I believe you'll find it in, oh yes, the Fourth Amendment: "...particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.""
DD: And I don’t give two farts what the proper term is if I want it I'll sieze it by any means necessary, like if I got to sieze your neck until you die to get it, whatever "It" is.
"'Why the CHP would need to seize the records, rather than just view them, is completely inexplicable.' Er, no -- I just explained that. If the CHP showed up at the hospital and said "Hi -- we'd like to look at patient Jane's records", there's only one acceptable response by the hospital: "Come back with a warrant." So, they did."
DD: Irrelevant, don't matter, NEXT!
"'The person served the warrant noted that it was issued to grab "property or things" as part of a felony investigation, which apparently included communications with her doctor about her well-being and "references to her attorney."'"
DD: and they better do like my prom date and "give it up" or there gonna' get what's coming to them next!
"For all we know the felony under investigation is the cop's conduct -- I'd like to think so."
DD: Trust me I asked Patrolman Peter about this It's not about him, she's going down for this stunt she pulled. Hard!
"tldr: Yes, please report, please even editorialize, but don't sensationalize -- it just kills credibility."
DD: You are so deluded! You want to know what really kills credibility? Not being a COP! Suk that "citizen"!
On the post: NSA On Snowden's Claims Of Passing Around Nudie Pics: We Totally Wouldn't Allow That... If We Knew About It
Re: Latest Snowden REVELATION!
The Spank-Bank
It's no wonder they needed so much storage.
On the post: NSA On Snowden's Claims Of Passing Around Nudie Pics: We Totally Wouldn't Allow That... If We Knew About It
Re:
On the post: NSA On Snowden's Claims Of Passing Around Nudie Pics: We Totally Wouldn't Allow That... If We Knew About It
Now I know why my job application was denied there...
None of the folks I was going to work with wanted me there as they knew (due to the warrantless mass surveilance of my internet porn viewing so they could use it to embarass high profile targets the rest of the world cares about) I'd be passing around the intercepted pics and videos of the "extremely un-attractive" people too!
On the post: The Inevitable: Drunk Man Arrested For Impersonating Groping TSA Agent At Airport
And I just though the government just really cared. How sad.
It was such a hearwarming experience that I actually got in line again to be "re-screened", I even changed my blouse so that nice young gentelman would not recognize me and I might get held again by the loving federal agent.
Finally after we "finished" the second time, I thought I detected something akin to The Reinheitsgebot on his breath and just imagined that those nice TSA agents are just so well trained not to let their love shine through and are required to act like the Geheime Staatspolizei, you provincials usually call them "The Gestapo", that finally with a hearty breakfast of small beer in him to warm not just his belly but also his heart, that I too finally came and came to love the TSA as much as they love all of us.
On the post: DOJ Tells Court That Of Course It Can Go On A Fishing Expedition Globally For Emails Microsoft Stores Overseas
Love it, it worked when I was a kid too DOJ
What-ever the other party claims, just keep saying "Nah-ah" with your fingers in your ears until they quit and give in.
On the post: Saying That You're Not Concerned Because The NSA Isn't Interested In You Is Obnoxious And Dangerous
Re:
"you are part of the Gallactic Empire and a traitor! Take him away!"
On the post: Saying That You're Not Concerned Because The NSA Isn't Interested In You Is Obnoxious And Dangerous
I'd have believed it also if his opener was instead...
because this seems to be the new normal
On the post: UK Government Admits Spying On Innocent Citizens, Reveals Flawed Assumption Underlying 'Collect It All' Surveillance
Re: Re: Re: Real subtle there
On the post: UK Government Admits Spying On Innocent Citizens, Reveals Flawed Assumption Underlying 'Collect It All' Surveillance
Re: Re: Real subtle there
On the post: Court Fines French Blogger $3,400 For Her Negative Review Of Local Italian Restaurant, Il Giardino
Re: Re: It's France...
On the post: Court Fines French Blogger $3,400 For Her Negative Review Of Local Italian Restaurant, Il Giardino
Re: Re: It's France...
I like to think that my cousin and a few others have repaid that, very old, debt.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vito_R._Bertoldo
On the post: Tilted Kilt Files Trademark Suit Against Golf Course With Kilted Employees
On the post: James Clapper Issues Non-Denial Denial Of Greenwald's Story About Surveillance Of Muslim-Americans
My Favorite Quote
As ther eare a limited number of "U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents" It wiould seem they are telling the truth.
Just spy on everyone and the "Limited Exceptions" are limited to the number of US persons and legal residents.
I have no idea what everyone is so worked up about, seems reasonable to me.
Next >>